Another example of the mainstream media covering up the truth. The New York Post reports: "Anti-immigrant protesters burn police van after girl attacked near Dublin asylum seeker housing." How does the story explain the protests or why the protestors were so upset? From the lede:
Anti-immigrant protesters burned a police vehicle and attacked officers near a building housing asylum seekers in Dublin on Tuesday, the justice minister said, a day after a man was arrested for an attack on a young girl nearby.
Hmm. A man attacked a young girl "nearby" a "building" housing asylum seekers. Any more details? Well, after lecturing the reader about how bad it was to protest immigration and "sow dissent," the article explains:
Police on Tuesday said a man in his 20s had been charged in the area following an alleged serious assault of a female juvenile.
So now it is more than just an "attack" but has become a "serious assault". Anything else? Nothing other than we learn that the attacker had an outstanding deportation order.
What were they hiding? Well, compare it against this article from the Irish Mirror: "Gardai investigating alleged rape of 10-year-old Irish girl by asylum seeker on grounds of Dublin hotel." The article relates that the girl was 10 years old, Irish, and apparently raped by an African migrant on the grounds of the Citywest Hotel in Dublin, which hotel had recently been purchased by the government to house asylum seekers. Also, the child had been in the care of Tusla, the State's Child and Family Agency, which apparently couldn't explain how the girl came to be at the hotel.
Yup, I'm sure they had no idea how she got there, or why the locals would protest, or why he was still in the country.
ReplyDeleteIt is her fault for being white and female. Cultural enrichment at its finest.
ReplyDeleteBecause saying the word "rape" might make the Irish feel something.
ReplyDelete