Government and Media Misinformation

 VIDEO: "They Weren't Expecting This"
Paul Joseph Watson (11 min.)

"The lady doth protest too much, methinks" is a famous line from Macbeth and commonly used to suggest that someone who denies something very strongly must be hiding the truth. It is apparently a formal policy of the UK government and news media, with the added threat from the government that if you question their "truth" you will face criminal charges.

One recent example where the truth has finally come out has to do with a little girl who was forced to display a knife and hatchet in order to protect her sister from a couple immigrants who propositioned the two girls and, subsequently, attacked them. Hot Air reports on the latest developments:

    In August of last year, Lola and Ruby Moire were walking home in a suburb of Dundee, Scotland, and being harassed by the ubiquitous 'migrants' who form so integral a part of these United Kingdom stories anymore. The abuse from their pursuers was so intense that one of the girls can be heard warning them off, shouting, 'Don’t f**king touch her, she’s f**king 12!' 

    Weapons the youngster had in her waistband came out, and she brandished them bravely as their tormentors taunted the little girls.

    Tormented, recorded, and then reported them to the police, who arrested the 12-year-old sister for 'brandishing a bladed weapon.'

    Several of the Xweets condemning both the arrest and the Labour government's two-tier indulgence of crimes against native British by its foreign imports, over those same citizens defending themselves from becoming victims or, even worse, criticizing the sorry state of things, have vaporised into the ether. No doubt after a campaign against 'misinformation' or maybe even a visit to the front door from Starmtrooping social media enforcement officers.

    As the world rallied around the young girl forced to swing a hatchet in self-defence, Keir Starmer's propaganda machine was already swinging the heavy battle axe of government propaganda against her. There are plenty of those Xweet and articles left from the rush to crush the nascent symbol of everything wrong with the Starmer regime.

    To turn the story back on the little psychopath and away from the innocently threatened immigrants.

    The BBC and the Dundee police were nearly beside themselves exonerating the completely innocent 'strolling Bulgarian couple' who'd been terrorized by the rampaging, blade-wielding pre-teen, and Scotland Yard was warning the public NOT TO SPREAD MISINFORMATION about the violent little urchin. She was no one's heroine.

Other British elites in government and media piled on, condemning the working class girls, defending the perverts that had accosted the girls, and warning against spreading "disinformation" about the incident.

    But even as the police were urging everyone to ignore the filthy little lying girls, they actually knew that the girl was completely justified in hauling out her arsenal. The Bulgarian couple were charged and the trial recently wrapped up and turns out that everything the girls had said was true as even the BBC reluctantly has reported:

    A man has been found guilty of making sexual remarks to a group of girls aged between 12 and 14 in Dundee before grabbing and pushing one of them to the ground.

    Ilia Belov, 22, claimed he confronted the girls after receiving abusive remarks and said he saw one of the girls with a knife in her waistband before the assault. [The article later indicates that the evidence showed he didn't see the knife until after he had pushed her to the ground].

    His sister Nadjedzha Belova, 20, previously admitted assaulting a 13-year-old girl by seizing and pulling her hair, dragging her to the ground, and striking her on the head to her injury during the incident.

    The pair will be sentenced at Dundee Sheriff Court on 5 August.

    The court heard that Belov had said "hello sexy, I'll show you a good time" to the girls while walking past them in the Lochee area of the city.

    After one of the girls called him a creep, he had returned to confront the group and called his sister, who arrived shortly afterwards and assaulted one of the girls. 

 The confrontation, or parts of it, were apparently caught on surveillance cameras. 

    Paul Joseph Watson has some more thoughts about this incident, particularly emphasizing that the police had evidence supporting the girls' account, yet nevertheless lied about the incident taking the side of the Bulgarian couple.

    Of course this is neither the first or last time. For instance, turning to classic propaganda in the U.S., the Emmett Till story has been carefully edited to make Till seem completely innocent in order to maximize white guilt. Matt Walsh has a video about that cover up:

 VIDEO: "The Emmett Till Story You've Heard Your Whole Life Is A Lie."
Matt Walsh (19 min.)

"Red Rabbits" Training For Uprising

The article is "Socialist ‘Red Rabbits’ are training for national uprising against cops" and it relates:

    As its national influence has risen, the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) has simultaneously grown more extreme. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the group's "Red Rabbits" initiative.

    The Red Rabbits Security Commission, a subgroup within the DSA focused on "community defense" efforts, is, according to its authorizing resolution, preparing for a "national uprising against federal agents and police brutality."

    In practice, that means training cadres in tactics like armed and unarmed self-defense, blocking intersections, and fighting "fascists" with umbrellas.

    A recent panel offered an unprecedented window into what the project looks like. Organizers from Minnesota, Oklahoma City, Philadelphia, Tucson, Austin, and Portland compared notes.

    As the discussion made clear, the DSA is trying to construct a nationwide security apparatus to support its expanding role in street protests and direct-action organizing. And in so doing, it fears drawing the attention of the Internal Revenue Service — likely with good reason.   

If Anonymous Conservative were to read this, he would probably laugh. You see, in his book The Evolutionary Psychology Behind Politics, he explains how the differences between conservatives and liberals can be explains by reference to evolutionary psychology: essentially, that liberals are what are termed r-select while conservatives are what are termed K-select. He used the short hand of "rabbits" to describe liberals and "wolves" to describe conservatives. 

    The article explains that "[o]rganizers chose the deliberately innocuous name as a nod to the novel 'Watership Down,' in which anthropomorphized rabbits are outnumbered and beset by enemies." But I have to wonder if, subconsciously, the name was selected because they recognize that they are like rabbits: promiscuous, generally pacifistic and anti-competitive, not invested in raising their children, lacking in-group loyalty, and existing only to consume public resources. 

    This is not to downplay the danger. This group is training and acting as the tip of the spear when it comes to disruption and street protests. Some of their training involves firearms and hand-to-hand combat. Even rabbits can bite.  

The Telegraph: "How bad will white rage get?"

Eric Kaufmann writes about the reaction to Henry Nowak's murder after the police bodycam footage was released and its implications for the future:

    Is this the week that white identity in Britain has emerged as a significant political force?

    The conviction of Henry Nowak’s killer and the release of police bodycam footage showing the 18-year-old student’s final moments in police custody have sparked outrage from politicians and the public.

    The tragic loss of Nowak’s life was dramatically compounded by the injustice that led to it. Here was an innocent young man who died as a result of an aggressor using false allegations of a racist attack – and of the police swallowing those lies, and acting on them to the extent that they ignored Nowak’s desperate cries that he had been stabbed and couldn’t breathe.

    For many, the officers’ decision to immediately accept Vickrum Digwa’s version of events was grim evidence of the “two-tier” justice system that has evolved, thanks to a state obsession with diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) above all else.

    Nigel Farage went as far as to say that Nowak had been “killed by DEI”, his murder acting as a “watershed moment” to confront “a two-tier culture where some groups receive greater protection than others”. “Henry’s family have responded to this in just the most extraordinarily dignified way,” Farage added. “But I suggest the rest of us respond to this with pure, cold rage.”

    Farage predicted that “the division will get far worse”, saying that violent protests in Southampton were “the beginning. If we get large numbers of young white males who think the police are prejudiced against them, goodness knows where we go. This has to end”.

    From the Left-wing point of view, this is tantamount to instigating a race war. Sir Keir Starmer accused Farage of “exploiting this tragedy to create grievance and division”.

    Even Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, accused Farage of “playing identity politics”, and behaving like a “rabble rouser”. In comments that emerged on Friday, which were made before the backlash over Nowak’s death, Badenoch warned that politicians who used political conflict to pander to particular communities risked a “civil war”.

    What Farage and Badenoch appear to understand is that two distinct forces are combining to raise the political significance of white identity in Britain – anti-white discrimination, and an anxiety among conservative white voters about the country’s rapidly changing demographics.

Anti-white discrimination

    Discrimination against white people in Britain has become a byproduct of woke ideology, which I define as the making sacred of historically marginalised race, gender and sexual identities. This reached a fever pitch between 2015 and the early 2020s, having been rocket-boosted in 2020 by Black Lives Matter protests following the death of George Floyd, which included the toppling of statues and the overhaul of museum displays.

    Today, it is encapsulated by the prioritisation of the concept of “equity” over “equality”, both in policing and elsewhere. 

    This became institutionalised in public and private organisations in the form of DEI policies. Instead of treating everyone equally, DEI seeks to engineer equal outcomes by favouring protected groups. It takes inspiration from the critical race theory slogan that “disparities equal discrimination”, and prefers a colour-conscious approach to a colourblind one.     

But as Kaufman goes on to explain, the result or consequence is active discrimination against white people:

    Instead of protecting all groups equally, DEI results in minorities, but not whites, being insulated by “hate speech” laws and corporate or university codes banning offensive speech. This also infringes on the freedom of expression of “privileged” groups, such as white people and men.

    While the law and public morality still claim to treat everyone the same, the reality is that critical theories of systemic racism, sexism and gender identity have deeply penetrated Britain’s legal system, institutions, social norms and public sensitivities. Thus, sections 158 and 159 of the 2010 Equality Act permit institutions to engage in “positive action” to hire and promote members of protected groups.

    The same legislation, introduced under Gordon Brown, enlarged the definition of discrimination to include radical “systemic” definitions, including so-called “indirect” forms, meaning that companies could be sued for policies which are applied in the same way for everyone, but are said to disadvantage a particular group. The Equality Act also introduced a legal duty on public bodies to not just protect against discrimination, but to promote non-discrimination and “foster good relations... between people who have a protected characteristic and those who do not”.

    This served as the justification for HR professionals and lobby groups to force DEI into companies, charities, schools, the NHS and other public bodies. While the legislation mentions that steps to combat discrimination should be “proportionate”, in practice, its spirit gave a green light to activists within organisations to start calling the shots. Banding together in identity-based “affinity groups” and DEI committees, and with the assistance of politically extreme DEI consultants and lobby groups such as Stonewall, they implemented their own expansive interpretations of the Equality Act. 

You can think of this as a type of "enshitification" of employment and education. As the author relates:

 Woke ideology dominates the ethos of numerous institutions, including universities, schools, the BBC, the NHS, the Civil Service and a growing number of law firms. A recent study found that up to 90 per cent of staff in UK public bodies surveyed using the centre-Left More in Common’s “Hidden Tribes” questionnaire were from the “progressive activist” segment of the population, which makes up just 10 per cent of society at large. Other organisations that have fielded the same survey have been so embarrassed by the skewed results that they have destroyed the data. The prestige of progressive extremism among the highly educated, who dominate human resources and public-facing roles, means that this ideology has even penetrated the upper reaches of institutions not dominated by university graduates, such as the police and military.

And pay particular attention to this bit (bold added):

Progressive staff hire each other and form echo chambers where their sense of reality departs from social norms. Only when scandals break the surface, as with the Nowak murder, the leaked report into BBC bias or universities advertising positions where white men are prohibited from applying, does woke capture become visible to the public. 

That describes how many groups infiltrate and eventually take over an institution. But it doesn't end with employment or education because it extends into politics. And in that regard, Kaufmann warns that  "the woke and anti-woke divide over race is emerging as a critical divide in British politics, predicting whether someone votes for a party of the Right or of the Left." 

    He goes on to discuss the split between the Left and the Right on different issues, demographic anxiety as a result of the "Great Replacement" (although he does not use that term), and the importance of allowing the Right to think it is being heard in order to avoid political violence. On this point, Kaufmann writes:

In addition, research shows that far-Right violence tends to be lower when populists do well in the polls because there is an electoral outlet for their frustrations. Political violence, whether in Northern Ireland prior to the rise of Sinn Fein as a party, or in contemporary England, is greater when there is no democratic safety valve for grievances. If Reform were in power, there is a reasonable chance that the Southport riots would not have taken place. And with Farage giving voice to the views of the demonstrators, they are more likely to feel that they are being heard, and thus less likely to riot. 

This should give you pause when you consider the number of "conservative" politicians that go soft after they enter office. Is their purpose to actually change anything or just act as a safety valve? Kaufmann expounds on this in his conclusion:

    The dual phenomena of demographic anxiety among white voters, and the perception that the system is slanted against them, has the potential to forge a powerful electoral bloc. Concerns about rapidly changing demographics, abetted by an elite which is unwilling to listen to restrictionist voters, exacerbate the sense of injustice created by the cascading effects of woke ideology. As the white British decline in number, demographic anxiety is likely to rise, while the willingness of a self-assured majority to grant extra privileges to minorities declines. This makes it all the more imperative not to fan the flames of populist resentment by implementing woke cultural socialism in our institutions.

    Criticism of DEI is not divisive – suppressing criticism is. To stand any chance of tackling this problem head-on, the cultural questions about changing society in the name of anti-racism or inclusion must be dealt with openly, not behind closed institutional doors. The ideas that equity should trump equality, and that some groups deserve special rights, run counter to what most British people believe.

    Woke is not some arcane intellectual pastime – it has powerful real-world effects. It is imperative that those who believe in freedom, truth and cohesion resist its pernicious effects on the elite institutions that govern much of our lives.

In other words, he is warning the elites that they are boiling the frog too quickly.

VIDEO: British Police Hate White People

Paul Joseph Watson has some video about the two-tier policing in the U.K., highlighting the difference of how police are reacting to the protests over their treatment of Henry Nowak versus how they treat minority groups protesting anything. As I noted recently, governments operating under international socialism--at least as it plays out in the West--hate their own people.  

 VIDEO: "This Is F*cking Terrifying"
Paul Joseph Watson (11 min.)

More On The Police Assisted Murder Of Henry Nowak

Nowak, as you may remember, was a British youth stabbed repeatedly by a non-British thug, Vickrum Digwa, then handcuffed and left to drown in his own blood by the British police. Spiked has more about this case and the cause of Nowak's death in its article: "Henry Nowak and the savagery of state wokeness." Digwa has been found guilty of murder; his mother, who removed the murder weapon from the scene and hid it, has been found guilty of "assisting an offender." 

As savage as the knifing was, it was what happened next that has shaken Britain’s soul. Digwa’s mother arrived and spirited away the murder weapon – it was later found hidden in the family home with 20 other Sikh swords and knives. Digwa then accused Nowak of having racially abused him. He said Nowak used a racist slur against him, punched him and knocked off his turban. These were ‘wicked lies’, the court heard during his murder trial. Yet there was a group of people on the scene of this atrocity who believed Digwa’s vile libels against the youth he had just fatally lacerated: the police.     

The author goes on to explain why the police believed Digwa and let Nowak die.  

    We all know why Digwa’s evil lie was believed and why wounded, gasping Henry’s pleas for help went unheeded – it’s because the word ‘racism’ acts like a magic spell on our ruling class. It’s like a rhetorical narcotic. The minute they hear it, they morph, like woke Manchurian candidates, into wide-eyed searchers for the merest hint of that greatest sin in our morally deracinated times: white privilege, and prejudicial speech. Their aim becomes not the discovery of truth but the demonstration of virtue. On that street in Southampton, once the word ‘racism’ had been uttered, the role of the state’s representatives suddenly and radically changed: it was no longer to investigate a potential crime but to obsequiously act out a moral script.

    Having prostrated themselves so fully before the new regime religion that falsely calls itself ‘anti-racism’, the police were virtually programmed to believe the ‘brown man’ and be sceptical of the ‘white man’. No doubt the critical race theory that pumps like a toxin in the veins of the establishment kicked in, meaning that the Sikh who had so ruthlessly wielded his sword instantly became the victim, while the target of his red-mist knifing – the white boy – became the oppressor. The state’s intoxication with the hyper-racialised politics of victimhood has driven it ever further into a quagmire of dogma where cool moral judgment is all but impossible. 

Read the whole thing.  

Canada And Godwin's Law

Godwin's Law states: "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one." But sometimes such comparisons are appropriate. Take, for instance, Canada. 

    The Kupferberg Holocaust Center has an article concerning the murder of the disabled in concentration camps that relates: 

    The Nazis considered people with disabilities to be “useless eaters” and a burden on the Aryan race. In order to purify German society, Hitler authorized the secret killing of psychiatric patients beginning in October 1939. The Nazi Euthanasia Program became known as Aktion T4 (named after the coordinating Chancellery office at Tiergartenstrasse 4 in Berlin) and marked Nazi Germany’s first campaign of mass murder. T4 initially targeted developmentally disabled infants and toddlers in Germany, but later included adults with disabilities all across Europe.

    German doctors and nurses played key roles, killing 250,000 people in a program that was euphemistically labeled as euthanasia. Many of these murders occurred even after Hitler publicly suspended the operation in August 1941. Physicians evaluated patients in asylums, hospitals, and nursing homes where anyone deemed unable to work or harmful to German society was taken to remote killing stations. Many were murdered in specially constructed gas chambers, while others were killed by lethal injection and systematic starvation. ...  

     Canada may not have the concentration camps, but it has its Medical Assistance In Dying (MAID) program, which the Canadian government describes thusly:

    Medical assistance in dying (MAID) is a process that allows someone who is found eligible to be able to receive assistance from a medical practitioner in ending their life. The federal Criminal Code of Canada permits this to take place only under very specific circumstances and rules. Anyone requesting this service must meet specific eligibility criteria to receive medical assistance in dying. Any medical practitioner who administers an assisted death to someone must satisfy certain safeguards first.

    Only medical practitioners are permitted to conduct assessments and to provide medical assistance in dying. This can be a physician or a nurse practitioner, where provinces and territories allow. 

And the Canadian government will pay for it, to boot. 

    It was sold to the public as a program only for the worst cases among those nearing the end of life, but it has not remained that way. In their 2025 essay, "The Cautionary Tale of Euthanasia in Canada," by Levi Minderhoud and Daniel Zekveld, they relate:

    Euthanasia [under the program] was first intended only for those nearing the end of their lives. Now, Canada has one of the most permissive euthanasia policies in the world, revealing a rapidly increasing culture of not just accepting death, but actively promoting it.

    Veterans have called the Ministry of Veterans Affairs looking for help and been offered euthanasia instead. Those with suicidal ideation have gone to the hospital for help, only to be encouraged to consider euthanasia. A woman was even asked if she was aware of the option of euthanasia before going into cancer-removing surgery. 

They continue:

    MAiD was first legalized in 2016 for Canadians whose death was “reasonably foreseeable.” At the time, a person had to have a grievous and irremediable medical condition which caused enduring physical or psychological suffering to qualify for euthanasia. Think of someone with a terminal cancer prognosis.

    In 2021, just five years after legalization, MAiD was expanded to include those whose “death is not reasonably foreseeable.” With this expansion, people with disabilities or non-terminal illnesses could choose to have a doctor end their lives. Think of someone who is wheelchair bound.

    The next expansion has already been passed into law, but implementation has been delayed until March 17, 2027. This would allow Canadians suffering solely from a mental illness to be eligible for euthanasia. Think of someone suffering from depression.

    Since legalization, the number of euthanasia deaths in Canada has steadily grown every year and showed little sign of slowing down. Between 2016 and 2023, over 60,000 Canadians have been euthanized, with over 15,000 in 2023 alone. Euthanasia now accounts for 4.7% of all deaths in the country, a rate second only to the Netherlands. Euthanasia is now the fifth most common cause of death in Canada. Compare these numbers with Oregon, the first American state to legalize assisted suicide in 1997. In 2023, 367 people died by assisted suicide in Oregon, or just 0.8% of all deaths in the state.

• See also "Why is Canada euthanising the poor?"--The Spectator. 

Well whether the implementation for mental illness is not supposed to be until 2027 is probably a moot point as it seems to already be a de facto criteria. Thus, we read in the Daily Mail this week: "Canadian doctor met man, 45, suffering from IBD and depression outside Tim Hortons and took him to be EUTHANIZED." The article recounts: 

    A Canadian doctor euthanized a man suffering from inflammatory bowel disease and depression after assessing him outside a Tim Hortons, according to officials. 

    Dr James MacLean has been placed under mandatory clinical supervision for six months following allegations that he improperly administered Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) to two patients.

    MacLean was investigated after he approved Thomas Dillon, who had Crohn's disease, for euthanasia. 

    Dillon, 45, was deemed eligible for MAID by MacLean and a nurse practitioner due to his condition, which led to persistent complications with a colostomy bag, according to medical records obtained by the Globe and Mail. 

    He also had a history of alcohol abuse, suicidal ideation and depression, according to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) report.

    MacLean conducted the MAID assessment outside a Tim Hortons in June 2023 and he was found eligible for the procedure under 'track 2', designed for patients who are not expected to die imminently but who will suffer grievously from an incurable condition.

    He then exchanged dozens of text messages about plans for him to be medically euthanized, records showed, which culminated in the doctor personally driving Dillon to a morgue facility in London to undergo the procedure.

    The doctor administered a lethal cocktail of drugs into Dillon's system in January 2024, inside a holding facility room in an industrial unit where human cadavers are prepared for funeral homes, officials said. 

    Well, some will argue, you can't really compare Canada to Nazi Germany on this issue because Canada's MAID laws require the person to be an adult (i.e., 18 years or more older). But even that is under discussion, with some medical professionals asserting it should be extended to "mature minors" and "the Quebec College of Physicians (CMQ) has raised the idea of extending current MAiD practices to cover infants under one year old in cases of 'severe deformities.'" 

    And I've discussed before the racist nature of MAID in that even the Canadian government acknowledges that 95.6% of the people being killed under the MAID are white.  

    In the end, what will be the real difference between Germany's Aktion T4 and Canada's MAID? That one government was comprised of national socialists and the other is international socialists? That just means that one government favored Germans and the other hates Canadians. 

Trump Bumps Up Refugee Cap ... For White South Africans

The Associated Press reports:

    The Trump administration said Tuesday that it will admit an additional 10,000 white South Africans into the U.S. as refugees this year, increasing its historically low annual cap but still blocking people from other countries from entering through the program.

    Trump suspended the refugee program on his first day in office and, since then, has turned it into a vehicle to allow Afrikaners — a group of white South Africans descended mainly from Dutch settlers — into the U.S. Advocates say the decision to focus a decades-old program on one group has left people around the world fleeing war and strife stranded and with few options.

    The administration says Afrikaners are subject to persecution in their home country, a charge the government in South Africa denies.  

The excuse given by the South African government is that South Africa has such a high murder rate that the murder rates of the Boer farmers is not abnormal. But what is abnormal is that Julius Sello Malema, the leader of the Economic Freedom Fighters--the third largest political party in South Africa--is infamous for regular chanting the anti-apartheid struggle song "Kill the Boer, Kill the Farmer" at political rallies. A chant with which the crowds join in. Nevertheless, that is not what prompted the recent bump in the refugee cap. Rather, turning back to the AP article:

    Christopher Landau, the deputy secretary of state, and Troy Edgar, the deputy secretary of Homeland Security, met with key congressional committees on Thursday as part of the legally required consultation process with lawmakers, according to two people who were granted anonymity to discuss a private meeting.

    During the hour-long session, Landau told lawmakers that one of the ways that Afrikaners had faced persecution at home was the erasure of their history in school textbooks, according to the people with knowledge of the meeting. The discussion infuriated Democrats, who called the approach and the consultation “indefensible.” 

Democrats have been trying to erase our history for decades so it no wonder they would defend South Africa doing the same. 

Yale Med In Trouble For Racial Discrimination

Townhall reports: "The Justice Department Found Yale Discriminated Against White, Asian Med School Applicants." A couple points from the article:

• The department looked at median grade-point averages and standardized test scores broken down by race, and concluded that “Yale’s use of race resulted in a Black applicant being as much as 29 times higher odds of getting an interview for admission than an equally strong Asian applicant with similar academic credentials.”
• The median entrance exam score for admitted Black students at Yale’s medical school last year was 518 and for 517 for Hispanic students, according to the Justice Department. The median score was 524 for both White and Asian students. The highest possible score is 528.
  
  The median grade point average in 2025 for admitted Black students was 3.88 and 3.91 for Hispanic students. For White students, it was 3.97 and for Asians 3.98.     

As the author sums up: "The Left does not care if your doctor harms or kills you, so long as they're diverse enough." 

England: Stabbing Victim Dies After Cops Arrest, Handcuff Him For "Racism"

The actual stabbing occurred in December 2025, but the details are only coming out in the trial of the murder suspect. From the Daily Signal:

    A teenage stabbing victim bled to death on the street in Southampton after British police arrested and cuffed him rather than his alleged Sikh attacker, after the suspect claimed he’d been racially abused, according to court testimony.

    Henry Nowak, 18, a finance student at the University of Southampton, was walking home from a night out in December 2025, chatting with some friends on Snapchat, when he was encountered by Vickrum Digwa, 23. After a brief exchange, Digwa stabbed Nowak with an eight-inch Sikh ceremonial shastar blade, according to court testimony reported by BBC. A post-mortem examination showed Nowak had four stab wounds, BBC reported.

    Nowak tried to escape over a fence, but was “aggressively pursued” by Digwa, jurors were told.

    However, when Hampshire Constabulary police officers arrived at the scene, they arrested the dying Nowak rather than Digwa after the suspect claimed he’d been “racially abused and attacked by a drunken man,” prosecutor Nicholas Lobbenberg KC said, ITV News reported.

    Nowak was handcuffed and police administered first aid before he fell unconscious, according to Lobbenberg. He died a short time later at the scene. “Put simply,” the prosecutor told jurors, “Henry drowned in his own blood, with his lung having been cut by the knife going eight centimeters into him.”   

Digwa claims that Nowak was being racist and he acted in self-defense (has England sunk so low that lethal force is justified against someone saying something you don't like?). However, it appears to have been a robbery as video from Nowak's phone--recovered from Digwa's pocket--doesn't record any racist statements from Nowak. "Digwa was charged with murder, while his mother, Kiran Kaur, 53, was charged with assisting the offender by allegedly removing the knife from the scene. The two have pleaded not guilty to the charges."

    Now how about charging the officers for letting Nowak bleed out rather than getting him medical aid, all because they believed he was a racist. I think that could potentially count as some form of homicide.  

    On that point is this article, "Antiracism is poisoning British policing," at UnHerd. It begins:

    Yesterday, Lord Daniel Hannan tweeted: “A man is stabbed to death by someone who accuses him of being a racist — and the first thing the police do on arrival is to handcuff the dying man.” Hannan speaks to a kind of “reverse Stephen Lawrence syndrome”, whereby conservative commentators view police as institutionally biased against white people. In 1999, the Macpherson Report into Lawrence’s murder was published, finding the Metropolitan Police liable for “institutional racism” in its handling of the case.

    What, though, has the Report actually achieved? Three decades of relentless antiracism seem to have pleased nobody, except for the well-remunerated professionals authoring indeterminable reviews into matters of race and diversity.

    The case Hannan references concerns the fatal stabbing of 18-year-old Henry Nowak in December last year. Nowak, a white student, was allegedly murdered by Vickrum Digwa, a 23-year-old British Sikh. Digwa, who is standing trial at Southampton Crown Court, claims he acted in self-defense after Nowak racially abused and assaulted him. These claims are heavily disputed; Digwa’s mother is accused of concealing the murder weapon, a 21cm-long Sikh religious dagger of questionable legality. The prosecution alleges Digwa removed his turban to make it look as if Nowak pulled it off his head, while the victim’s mobile telephone was discovered in Digwa’s pocket.

    Most controversially, Nowak, bleeding heavily from four stab wounds, was handcuffed at the scene by officers from Hampshire Police. The implication is clear: the police force was more concerned with matters of race than tending to a fatally injured teenager.

    Much, it should be said, remains unknown. The trial is ongoing, with key facts sub judice. Hampshire Police is yet to release a statement concerning its officers’ actions. Body-worn camera footage is presumably being withheld until offered in evidence. It should also be remembered that crime scenes can be chaotic, with initial witness accounts garbled and confusing. Yet, as happened in the Stephen Lawrence case, the narrative has already stuck. Cops instinctively jumped at the dog whistle of racism, while the real victim bled out.

    Paul Joseph Watson also offers some thoughts in the video below:

VIDEO: "The Worst One I've Ever Seen"
Paul Joseph Watson (7 min.)

DEI Spells DIE

In "Medicine Without Merit," Forrest Bohler describes his struggles to be accepted into medical school. Not because he wasn't qualified--he more than met the qualifications--but because so many spots were being reserved for less qualified minority applicants. He begins:

    When I applied to medical school in the midst of the pandemic and in the wake of the death of George Floyd, I had reason to think I was a competitive applicant, particularly for my state’s public medical school, which favors in-state candidates with strong academic records. I didn’t assume I was entitled to admission, but I thought I would get in somewhere. I didn’t.

    So I did what failed applicants are told to do: I sought feedback. Eventually, I spoke with an admissions officer at one of the schools that rejected me. He told me that I was extremely qualified and had everything the school looked for in an applicant. He said he couldn’t give me a concrete reason I wasn’t accepted, other than that I didn’t fit the demographic the school was prioritizing, and that other applicants were viewed as having “traveled a longer distance” to medicine. My application, he said, was evaluated through that lens.

    That conversation unsettled me in a way I didn’t immediately recognize. I was being told I was qualified, capable, and deserving but simultaneously that those qualities were not enough due to certain immutable characteristics. I had spent years learning about discrimination as something that happened to other people. Nothing in my education had prepared me to think that it could happen to people like me. 

    Then it did.

    Perhaps I should have seen it coming. The requirements for admission into medical school vary markedly depending on who the applicant is. According to data from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), the academic thresholds required for acceptance differ substantially between racial groups. The average MCAT score of a white applicant who is accepted into a medical school is 512.4, approximately the 85th percentile nationally. By contrast, the average MCAT score for accepted American Indian applicants is 502.2 (56th percentile), for accepted black applicants 505.7 (67th percentile), and for accepted Hispanic applicants 506.4 (69th percentile).

    The disparities are even more pronounced when we look at the applicant pool as a whole. White applicants overall, including those who are rejected, have an average MCAT score of 507.8, roughly the 73rd percentile. In other words, accepted black, Hispanic, and American Indian medical students matriculate with lower MCAT scores, on average, than white applicants who have not yet been accepted to medical school. The same pattern appears when we turn to undergraduate GPA. White applicants apply with an average GPA of 3.7, but require an average GPA of 3.8 to gain admission, while accepted black, Hispanic, and American Indian applicants matriculate with average GPAs of 3.59, 3.66, and 3.64, respectively.

But admissions wasn't the end of it. He describes having to undergo DEI and "anti-Racist" indoctrination classes, as well as similar requirements at other medical schools. He was subjected to discriminatory language such as derogatory comments about "old white men" in medicine or questioning how his adoptive Asian sister could feel safe in a white family in Montana. Terms like fallopian tube was no longer acceptable because the name came from Italian anatomist Gabriele Falloppio--a white person. DEI activities were factored into consideration for awards and scholarships. 

    And the consequence is fewer white men in medicine. As the author writes:

In medical education, more diversity means fewer white men. In 2014, white men made up roughly 31 percent of US medical students, a figure closely aligned with their share of the national population. If the stated goal of equity initiatives in medicine were for the field to achieve roughly proportional representation of the national population, that number would not have been treated as a problem in need of correction. And yet, over the following decade, it fell substantially. By 2025, white men accounted for just 20.5 percent of medical students, a 30.6 percent decrease, placing the demographic well below its population share. 

But because medical training take so long, the consequences of admitting and promoting less qualified medical students had been delayed. As the author notes, "When those cohorts eventually emerge as attending physicians, the costs will be borne not by institutions or administrators, but by patients and by a profession that depends on competence to maintain public trust."

    Although Bohler was finally admitted and did very well, he nevertheless suffered the three prohibited practices of racial discrimination: harassment which created an uncomfortable learning environment, disparate treatment because he was white male forcing him to obtain additional post-graduate education before he was finally admitted, and disparate impact because of policies enacted to reduce the number of white male students. This seems like a case ripe for either a suit by the DOJ or a class action suit against the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME)--the group that accredits medical schools--the individual medical schools, and the specific employees or officials that engaged in the discrimination. In fact, over the long run, it might be better for the Federal government to take over accreditation from the LCME and then perhaps we could more medical schools and work on graduating more doctors. 

Providence, RI, Values Blacks Stabbing White Women To Death

The New York Post reports that "[a] mural painted to honor Iryna Zarutska — the Ukrainian refugee who was murdered [by a black man] while riding a North Carolina train — is being taken down after outrage in Providence, Rhode Island." 

The office of Mayor Brett Smiley told Fox News that he wanted the artwork taken down, saying that the art is “divisive and does not represent Providence.”   

Providence is home to a street mural honoring "Black Lives Matter" (see also here); a second "Black Lives Matter" mural;  a "mural-like image of George Floyd" on a utility box; a "SAY THEIR NAMES" mural listing George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Ahmaud Arbery, Tony McDade, David McAtee; and others. For instance, this news story from 2020 reported that murals were going up all over Providence after George Floyd riots. All deeply divisive. 

    So the issue isn't "divisive" murals. It's that they hate white people, and so Zarutska's fate isn't, in their view, worth remembering.

A Few On The Decline Of Civilization

• "EU country ‘punishing’ the elderly with crazy meat restriction of just 2.8 ounces per [week] — because they ‘screwed up’ the climate"--New York Post.  The politician is a liberal white woman, of course. 

    Birgitte Kehler Holst of the left-wing green Danish party The Alternative was also accused of saying old people in nursing homes should be “punished” by restricting their meat intake in comments made in a meeting of Copenhagen’s City Council on April 30.

    She was speaking against plans to exclude nursing home residents from guidelines in the Danish capital that restrict meals at government-run sites to just 2.8 ounces (80 grams) of beef, lamb, or veal per week.

    That is less than the amount of beef in a standard McDonald’s Big Mac, which contains two 1.6-ounce beef patties — for a total of 3.2 ounces.  

 Malte Larsen of the populist Danish People’s Party pointed out the hypocrisy:

    “According to a politician from The Alternative, it’s because our elderly have been the biggest climate sinners throughout their lives. And therefore, they must be punished,” he added.

    Larsen also ripped the rhetoric of “self-righteous climate fanatics” as “grotesque,” adding that it was a pointless gesture.

    “No, we’re not saving the entire world by having our elderly eat only 11.4 grams of beef per day. Denmark emits 0.1% of the world’s human-caused CO2,” he added, taking aim at the hypocrisy of many climate activists.

    “Many of these climate fanatics who implement this kind of draconian climate measure have no problem flying back and forth to attend irrelevant climate conferences,” he said. 

This has nothing to do with saving the environment and everything to do with saving money. The welfare state is running out of money and the foreigners from the Middle-East and Africa which were supposed to work and pay into the system have instead merely increased the burden on social services. But rather than get rid of the foreigners, the leftists want to kill off the elderly white people that actually contributed to the system. 

• "Guess Why a Chicago Alderman Wants to Charge Walgreens With Crimes"--Townhall. Chicago Alderman William Hall wants to punish Walgreens for shutting down stores. The stores are being closed because the out-of-control shoplifting by Hall's constituents means that they lose money hand over fist. Hall says that Walgreens should be charged with "corporate abandonment". It's not a crime, yet. But this probably reflects ideas being circulated among leftists. This is probably a test to see how people react to the idea. 
• The usual suspects: "Violent teens clash with cops at NJ carnival — prompting officials to cancel beloved yearly event." The article reports:

    Unruly teens violently overwhelmed a New Jersey community carnival, sparking several fights and cursing out police officers, forcing organizers to prematurely shutter the beloved annual event.

    A large gathering of “unsupervised juveniles” descended on the Maple Shade Tigers Youth Football Carnival at JFK Memorial Field in Maple Shade, NJ, on May 1, inundating the yearly gathering that raises funds for the youth sports organization, according to township officials.

    “Officers on scene, along with event organizers, directed those involved and other unruly individuals to leave the carnival grounds in an attempt to restore order and maintain public safety,” Maple Shade officials said.

    “As a result of the incident, the carnival was closed for the remainder of the evening.” 

The Federalist: The Real SPLC Scandal Is Their Use By The FBI

 Nicholas Giordano, writing at The Federalist, argues that "[t]he real Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) scandal isn’t just the indictment. The deeper scandal is that the FBI used a highly partisan activist group as an unelected, unvetted intelligence wing of the federal bureaucracy." He adds:

For years, the bureau didn’t just consult the SPLC. It folded the group’s ideology into its threat assessments and other work products, then used those products to brand Americans as hateful or flag them as potential domestic violent extremists.  

How did this work out in practice?

    The FBI’s Richmond memo, better known as the anti-Catholic memo, showed exactly what that pipeline looked like in practice. The FBI used the SPLC’s analysis to define so-called “radical-traditionalist Catholics” by their opposition to abortion, LGBT ideology, and adherence to traditional family values. Sen Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, revealed that one Richmond analyst produced a slide presentation that equated Catholic beliefs in “[c]onservative family values/roles” with ideas “[c]omparable to Islamist ideology.” 

    Despite former FBI Director Christopher Wray’s claim that the anti-Catholic memo was the work of “a single field office” with limited distribution, the records tell a different story. Multiple field offices were involved, the memo was distributed to more than 1,000 agents and employees, and congressional investigators uncovered at least 13 more documents using similar SPLC-driven “anti-Catholic terminology.” Ideological narrative laundering became the FBI’s standard practice.

    FBI officials themselves recognized the problem. In an internal FBI email exchange, one official asked, “Is anyone really asking for a product like this?” and complained that “[a]pparently we are at the behest of the SPLC.” Another FBI official admitted the FBI’s “overreliance on the SPLC hate designations is … problematic.”

Read the whole thing. 

The Purpose Of An Organization is What It Does: Brady, Giffords Law Center, and Everytown

Ammo Land reports that "Gun-Control Groups Tell Court Americans Have No Right to Body Armor," referring to arguments made by the Brady, Giffords Law Center, and Everytown gun control groups supporting a New York law that would ban most citizens from purchasing body armor. The author remarks: "Calling armor dangerous because it can stop a bullet is a confession that the anti-gun movement is not merely interested in disarming citizens. It wants citizens easier to hurt." 

This Is How Liberals Show Compassion

"In Cities Across America, Homeless Services Are Doled Out Based on Race and Sexual Identity"--Washington Free Beacon. How does this work out in Portland (Multnomah County) Oregon?

Rolled out in October 2024, the Multnomah Services and Screening Tool awards up to 5 points to non-white, non-straight applicants who speak English as a second language—more than the 4 points it would award a domestic violence survivor with a six-year-old child who has been homeless for over a year. 

Ann Arbor, MI, Removes Neighborhood Watch Signs

Ann Arbor, Michigan, spent $18,000 to remove neighborhood watch signs claiming they were racist. Soy-boy Mayor Christopher Taylor explained that neighbors looking out for one another was "inconsistent with our values" and an expression of exclusion. Black council member Cynthia Harrison was also concerned that the signs sent an unwelcome message to criminals that look like her. Mayor Taylor reminded residents that if they wanted to file complaints about the police, however, they could do so by contacting the Ann Arbor Independent Community Police Oversight Commission (AAICPOC). The Commissions' mission statement includes this: "To promote positive interactions between the police department and members of vulnerable, at-risk and marginalized groups within the community."

Is The SPLC Handing Out More Money?

The New York Post reports: "Sicko walks through quiet Rhode Island town in KKK robes: ‘That’s a whole different level of racism’."

CT Dem Wants To Ban "Automated" Guns

From Breitbart: "Connecticut Democrat: Ban Guns That Can Be Converted ‘Into Semi or Fully Automated Weapons’." The article notes that "Connecticut state Rep. Bob Godfrey (D) spoke in favor of banning firearms that are 'too easily converted into semi or even fully automated weapons.'" You might think the law was to protect us from rogue AIs and their terminator drones and robots, but you would be wrong. It was just another ignorant politician demonstrating that he knows nothing about what he intends to ban.

    Godfrey was defending the convertible pistol ban, aka, the Glock ban, which the Connecticut House passed on Wednesday.

    CT Mirror reported that the ban “passed by a vote of 86-64, with all the House Republicans and 15 Democrats voting in opposition.”

    The Mirror noted that Godfrey defended the bill as it moved through the House. He admitted that Connecticut citizens have a right to own firearms for self-defense but hedged that admission by saying the state’s legislature has the ability to define which firearms constitute “defensive weapons.”

Reminds me of this meme:

 

Source: WRSA

Democrats Are Sick

It is being reported that, last Thursday on his late night show on ABC, Jimmy Kimmel gave his own speech mocking the White House Correspondence dinner in which he said: “Our first lady, Melania, is here. Look at Melania, so beautiful. Mrs. Trump, you have a glow like an expectant widow.” Two days later an assassin tried to rush into the dinner, shooting a Secret Service Agent in the process. 

I'm not saying that Kimmel was involved in planning or carrying out the assassination attempt--although I think the possibility should be investigated--but he clearly hoped that someone would do something. In essence, he sent out a request to all the Democrat wind-up toys.  

Meanwhile, although the would-be assassin penned a manifesto (or diatribe, if you prefer) on why he hates Trump that echoes mainstream Democrat talking points, prominent Democrats--including Barack Obama--claim we don't know the motive for the attack. Other Democrats are incensed that people have noticed that the gunman was a Democrat. But as Stephen Green writes:

    Dems, you have a problem.

    "The same week the New York Times published a cozy interview justifying the murder of people whose politics you don’t like, the same week we learned that the Unite the Right Charlottesville rally was funded by the Left-wing Southern Poverty Law Center, President Trump survived his third assassination attempt," Batya Ungar-Sargon wrote on Sunday.

    "A recent YouGov poll says it all: 25% of very liberal Americans consider political violence justified—compared to 3% of very conservative Americans. Another 17% of liberal Americans say it’s justified, compared to just 6% of conservatives."

    The left has worked hard at normalizing political violence — and Allen's murderous intent is the left's new mainstream.     

Daniel Greenfield, writing at Frontpage Magazine, points out that the Democrats have become a party of assassins:

    But even while people are talking about Cole Tomas Allen becoming ‘radicalized’, there’s no evidence that he was ideologically radicalized. And it’s important for us to understand this.

    Unlike Thomas Crooks, the Butler assassin, Allen wasn’t quoting Mao about power coming from the barrel of a gun. Unlike Austin Tucker Martin, who was shot and killed while breaking into Mar-a-Lago while armed with a shotgun back in March (notably there are so many attempts to kill Trump that they quickly vanish from the media coverage) he didn’t go down a social media conspiracy rabbit hole (Martin was obsessed with conspiracies tying Trump to Epstein.)

    Allen and Routh’s views were generally those of mainstream liberal Democrats. They were no more extreme than your average MSNBC viewer. Probably even a smidgen more moderate.

    And they were probably no more radical than the average committed Democrat.

    The only difference between the two assassins and the rest of their political movement was that they didn’t just buy t-shirts calling for Trump’s murder (Amazon has a Google search result ‘Trump Dead Shirt’ to cash in on this trend) or put up ‘Is He Dead Yet’ signs on their lawns or confine themselves to fulminating on social media… they did something about it.

    That doesn’t make them more radical than the average Democrat. Just more serious.

[snip]

    This is not some grassroots phenomenon but the messaging from the top down of the party and its media apparatus. That’s why Allen’s views are entirely reflective of their rhetoric. He wasn’t a Marxist, a Communist or a Socialist… his views were those of the mainstream of his party. (The amount of distance between the Democrats and the Marxists of course is rapidly shrinking.)

    But Allen didn’t try to kill Trump and members of his administration officials in the name of socialized medicine, a command economy, the working class or any affirmative leftist cause.

    He did it because he had been brainwashed into believing he was stopping Hitler 2.0.

 And thus we come full circle back to Kimmel and others like him urging someone, anyone, to rid him of this turbulent president.  

See The Violence Inherent In The Leftism: Another Assassination Attempt

    As you undoubtedly already know, yesterday evening, a gunman tried to rush by security and burst into the Washington Hilton ballroom where the White House Correspondents' Dinner (WHCD) was being held. This is the first WHCD which President Trump attended as President. The gunman opened fire, striking a Secret Service agent, but reports indicate that the agent was uninjured because of his Kevlar vest. 

    The shooter was identified as 31-year old  Cole Allen of Torrance, Calif., who apparently worked as a teacher at C2 Education, a tutoring and test prep company. Considering that he graduated from the California Institute of Technology in 2017 with a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering, this seems rather a step down. 

    Records also showed that he had donated to the Kamala Harris campaign in 2020. The photographs show that he is a POC. Per the Post's article, "[h]e was part of a group called 'The Wide Awakes' and is believed to have attended a 'No Kings' protest in California, where he attended college and worked as a teacher." Presumably "The Wide Awakes" is in reference to this group which uses the Illuminati eye symbol. (The historic "Wide Awakes" group were young militant Republicans opposed to slavery). 

    Per the DC Police, Allen was armed with a shotgun, a handgun, and multiple knives as he ran into that checkpoint. According to a manifesto Allen sent to family members just minutes before his attack, his attention was to kill "Administration officials (not including [FBI Director Kash] Patel): they are targets, prioritized from highest-ranking to lowest" and would go through whomever he needed to get to his targets (he believed anyone attending the dinner was complicit), yet also states that he selected buckshot rounds instead of slugs in order to minimize casualties due to over penetration from the slugs.  He apparently was triggered by Trumps opposition to illegal immigration and drug cartels. 

More: 

• "Read White House Correspondents’ Dinner gunman Cole Allen’s full anti-Trump manifesto"--New York Post.