Saturday, May 30, 2026

Summer Carry For Women

Stavroula ("Stav") MacQuarrie of the She Equips Herself YouTube channel, discusses some different methods and holsters she uses for carrying in summer with different outfits: a fairly tight but long skirt, and a few shorts and tops outfits. The methods include inside the thigh, using a Sticky Holster inside a waistband, and a couple methods of off-body carry (but about as "off-body" as a belt holster). 

    As a side note, I had noted earlier this month that women have more freedom than men in what type of clothing they can wear given them more options when it comes to concealed carry, and this video seems to confirm my point. 

 VIDEO: "This season is the most challenging for concealed carry ☀️🍉🌴 | Summer outfit and holster combos 😎" -- She Equips Herself (17 min.)

Signs You Are In A Collapsing Society

The New York Post reports that copper theft has become so prevalent in Los Angeles that the City's Department of Water and Power wants its own police force to deal with the problem

    The LA Department of Water and Power made the request in a letter sent to the City Council, pointing out that the Port of Los Angeles and Los Angeles airports have their own police authorities.

    The agency already employs security guards, but “they lack the authority to detain or arrest suspects, intervene in crimes in progress, conduct searches, or carry firearms for enforcement purposes,” the letter said. 

    The department currently depends on local law enforcement to respond speedily, but that’s unreliable in remote locations where there is critical infrastructure, it added.

    If such an armed force was granted, the department expects to add 20 to 50 officers, who would have the authority to carry a firearm, make arrests and investigate thefts, in addition to handling jobs like dispatch and crime analysis.
 

The article indicates that wire theft alone costs the city $20 million per year, while setting up such a police force would cost $9 million with an additional $6 million per year operating budget.  

     Of course the problem is not limited to just Los Angeles as this 2024 article from Wired makes clear: "The Green Economy Is Hungry for Copper—and People Are Stealing, Fighting, and Dying to Feed It." The article begins by recounting an attack on South African utility employees by a gang armed with automatic weapons, adding:

    In most places, power companies are a pretty dull business. But in South Africa they are under a literal assault, targeted by heavily armed gangs that have crippled the nation’s energy infrastructure and claimed an ever-growing number of lives. Practically every day, homes across the country are plunged into darkness, train lines shut down, water supplies cut off, and hospitals forced to close, all because thieves are targeting the material that carries electricity: copper.

    The battle cry of energy transition advocates is “Electrify everything.” Meaning: Let’s power cars, heating systems, industrial plants, and every other type of machine with electricity rather than fossil fuels. To do that, we need copper—and lots of it. Second to silver, a rarer and far more expensive metal, copper is the best natural electrical conductor on Earth. We need it for solar panels, wind turbines, and electric vehicles. (A typical EV contains as much as 175 pounds of copper.) We need it for the giant batteries that will provide power when the sun isn’t shining and the wind isn’t blowing. We need it to massively expand and upgrade the countless miles of power cables that undergird the energy grid in practically every country. In the United States, the capacity of the electric grid will have to grow as much as threefold to meet the expected demand.

    A recent report from S&P Global predicts that the amount of copper we’ll need over the next 25 years will add up to more than the human race has consumed in its entire history. “The world has never produced anywhere close to this much copper in such a short time frame,” the report notes. The world might not be up to the challenge. Analysts predict supplies will fall short by millions of tons in the coming years. No wonder Goldman Sachs has declared “no decarbonization without copper” and called copper “the new oil.”

    As the energy transition gathers speed, the value of copper has also soared. In the past four years, the price of a ton of copper has shot from about $6,400 to more than $9,000. That, in turn, has made electrical wiring, equipment, and even raw metal fresh from the mines into juicy targets for thieves. All around the world, hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of the metal has been stolen—and countless lives have been lost. With the possible exception of gold, no other metal has caused so much death and destruction.

 After describing expanding copper production in Africa and environmental impacts of a huge open pit copper mine in Chile, the article returns to copper theft:

    The treasures these mines produce are magnets for some astonishingly brazen criminals. By the light of the full moon, bandits in Toyota Tundra pickups roll up alongside trains that are hauling copper slabs from the mines high in the Atacama down to the coast. With perhaps a whispered prayer to the spirits of Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, the bandits leap aboard the copper cars, slice through the ropes securing the 180-pound slabs, toss them into the beds of the speeding trucks, and disappear into the night.

    The problem is so acute that the Chilean national police have set up a special copper task force. But trains were still being robbed regularly when I visited Chile in 2022. And not just trains, for that matter. In January of 2023, a team of thieves hit the country’s main seaport, overpowered a handful of workers, and made off with a dozen containers full of Codelco’s copper—more than $4 million worth.

    No one knows exactly how much copper is stolen every year across the world. Thieves typically sell their wares to no-questions-asked scrapyards and recyclers, who strip off cable coatings and other nonmetallic materials and then shred or melt down the copper. Anyone can do it: The metal can be melted with blowtorches or small furnaces you can buy on Amazon. There are plenty of online videos that can walk you through the process. Once rendered into generic form, stolen copper can be mixed with legally obtained metal. At that point it’s easy to sell into the regular market, its origin essentially impossible to trace.

    It’s safe to say, however, that the amount stolen each year is many, many millions of dollars’ worth—possibly billions. In one particularly audacious theft in 2023, nearly $200 million worth of copper and other metals was lifted from Aurubis, Europe’s largest producer. The biggest heists, at least in the US, are often inside jobs. In 2013, police shut down a ring that had ripped off as much as $80 million worth of copper ingots from an Arizona mine. Prosecutors said that workers in on the scheme would open the gates for trucks driven by their confederates, who loaded them up with raw copper and drove right back out. The metal was sold to recyclers in California, who blackened it to make it look like scrap and then shipped it to China. Unraveling the plot took nerve. At one point, a company rep from the mine found a severed goat’s head nailed to his door.

    Most American copper thieves, however, are small-time opportunists drawn to a laughably easy score. So much copper is just left out in the open. It doesn’t take much skill or daring to tear out wiring in an abandoned building, break open an air conditioner sitting behind an apartment block, or snatch a manhole cover on a quiet suburban street. Thousands of copper thefts are reported each year. The booty includes fire hydrants, a 3,000-ton bell, a bust of Orville Wright, and at least one urn containing human ashes.

    The cost of fixing the damage often far exceeds the value of the stolen metal. Ripped-out cables have shut down drinking water supplies in Hawaii, streetlights in Missouri, airport runway lights in Washington, and whole subway lines in New York City. The US Department of Energy has estimated that copper theft causes $1 billion worth of damage every year to facilities and businesses considered critical infrastructure.

    Then there’s the shocking number of lives lost. Again, no one knows the exact numbers, but just from scanning through 10 years or so of local news articles I found dozens of reports of Americans who were fatally electrocuted while trying to steal live copper wire. And at least one security guard who was murdered trying to stop one of those thefts.

    In South Africa, though, widespread poverty, ineffective police, and soaring metal prices have turned copper theft into a major industry. Mines are rich targets, even those that don’t extract copper. Their subterranean networks of shafts and tunnels need power to run lights and digging equipment. That power, of course, is carried by miles of electric cable, conveniently left unguarded and out of sight. On any given day, hundreds of desperate people are risking their lives to get that metal.

    They’re known as zama zamas—roughly meaning “take a chance” in Zulu. These illegal miners clamber down mine shafts on ropes or handmade ladders, then make their way into the tunnels. There, they set up underground camps. Hundreds of zama zamas may be living underground at any given time, some spending weeks or even months down in the tunnels.

    It’s an astonishingly common and deeply disruptive crime. A single mining company, Implats, reported around 800 incidents of cable theft in 2021. Stolen cables have forced companies to shut down mines for weeks at a time.

    It’s also a phenomenally dangerous way to earn a living. Illegal miners have died by the dozens in gas explosions, floods caused by heavy rains, and other accidents. In 2021, a mining company sealed off a ventilation shaft that a group of zama zamas was using to supply their compatriots underground. Desperate, the miners blew open the hole with explosives. Police and private security guards wound up in a pitched battle with the escaping zama zamas. At least eight people were killed.

    Above ground, gangs have hijacked dozens of trucks carrying copper to South Africa’s ports, making off with millions of dollars’ worth of metal. Meanwhile, the electric grid is being plundered so often and so thoroughly that the whole country is affected. In 2021, the railway company Transnet reported that more than 1,000 kilometers of overhead power cables had been stolen. A recent report from the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime notes that “while two security guards may have proved a deterrent in the past,” gangs “now come in groups of 20 or 30 and are often heavily armed, with ‘spotters’ shooting at patrol vehicles.” Cell phone towers, water pipelines, and electric power stations are similarly under assault. Thieves disguise themselves as workers dispatched to tear up underground cables, or bribe actual power company employees, or just show up brandishing guns and use four-wheel-drive trucks to rip cables out of the ground.

    Ordinary South Africans pay a heavy price. Children have died falling into manholes after their covers were stolen. In addition to disrupted train lines and power, water, and phone service outages, a Johannesburg hospital was kept closed after someone stole its copper pipes, cables, and electrical equipment. Police believe rivalry between gangs involved in stealing cables spurred two mass shootings that left 21 people dead in the Johannesburg area in 2022. And a number of security guards trying to protect some company’s copper have also been wounded or killed—like Moqadi Mokoena, the Johannesburg guard shot to death in his truck.

    The wave of copper theft has sparked a backlash of vigilante violence in some impoverished townships. Suspected thieves have been assaulted, beaten and occasionally lynched. “This is the only language that criminals understand,” a resident of a town where an alleged cable thief was beaten to death told local media. In March of 2023, four electric company workers were killed in a Johannesburg suburb by a mob that mistook them for cable thieves.

The solution to all of this suggested by the writer is to focus on copper demand. And this means that rather than shifting from gas powered vehicles to electric vehicles, which will consume even more copper, that we build out "public transit, subsidized ebikes, and developed more walkable cities[.]"

    The Wired article indicates, however, that we have exploited the largest, easiest to mine, deposits. But that may not be the case. In March of this year, the discovery of one of the world's largest deposits was discovered in Argentina. Popular Mechanics reports: "Geologists May Have Found One of the World’s Greatest Treasures. Some Say It’s Too Dangerous to Dig Up." 

    Located along the border of Chile and Argentina, the Filo del Sol copper deposit has been under investigation for years for potentially being one of the largest copper deposits in the world. And that makes sense, considering this treasure is nestled along the Atacama Desert—long known for its immense copper reserves due to its location in the Andes and its placement within the eastern portion of the Ring of Fire.

    However, an initial mineral resource estimate completed in 2025 suggests that the companies in charge of mining this area—the U.S.-based Lundin Mining and BHP—may have stumbled upon five times more metal than they bargained for.

    According to a statement from Lundin Mining, the assessment estimates the presence of up to 13 million tonnes of copper, 907,000 kilograms (32 million ounces) of gold, and 18.6 million kilograms (659 million ounces) of silver. This update, gathered from data collected from 400 additional exploration holes, came from the discovery that deeper mineralization of copper far exceeded the estimates that were closer to the surface. According to AFP, Filo del Sol could prove to be richer still, as experts dig deeper and explore the resource’s northern and southern boundaries

It is the altitude at which the deposits sit that make it potentially dangerous to mine.

    And last year, Newser reported on a new copper mine in Arizona expected to come online in late 2028.  

    So not all is doom and gloom.   

Related:

Friday, May 29, 2026

The Political Spectrum In A Nut Shell

 

Source: Barnhardt Memes

What Does He Know That We Don't?

From the New York Times (archived): "Why Peter Thiel Is Decamping to the End of the World." Wikipedia notes that Thiel was a "co-founder of PayPal (1998), Palantir Technologies (2003), and Founders Fund (2005), he was also the first outside investor in Facebook (2004). According to The New York Times, as of December 2025, Thiel's estimated net worth stood at US$27.5 billion, placing him among the 100 richest individuals in the world." In other words, he heads up companies that know more about you than you do. 

    So it is with interest that the Times reports:

    Mr. Thiel, who has a history of collecting backup countries as he hedges his bets against the United States, is considering making Argentina another Plan B, according to two people familiar with his thinking. Born in Germany and raised in the United States, he received citizenship in New Zealand in 2011, and applied for a passport in Malta in 2022.

    His new roots in Argentina are partly motivated by his concerns about the direction of the United States, the people familiar with his thinking say, particularly California, where an initiative on November’s ballot could lead to a significant tax on billionaires.

    Argentina, a nation relatively insulated from potential conflicts in the Northern Hemisphere, also fits as a potential escape hatch from other risks that Mr. Thiel has publicly warned about — nuclear war and runaway artificial intelligence.

    But Mr. Thiel has also been energized by what he’s discovered in Argentina, finding harmony with Mr. Milei’s libertarian slash-and-burn governance and becoming enamored with Buenos Aires’ vibrancy, the people said. They, and others familiar with the billionaire’s activities and discussions about the country, spoke on condition of anonymity to share private conversations. 

And its not just business that drew him there. He has relocated his family there, including enrolling his children in school there. 

    Perhaps Thiel is there to buy up the country. Perhaps he is there because he fears World War III. Perhaps he fears civil war in the U.S. It would be interesting to know what his AIs have predicted. 

Weekend Reading #58

Some longer and more involved reading for the weekend:

  • First up is a new Weekend Knowledge Dump from Active Response Training.  Lots of good stuff, but here are some of the links that caught my attention for one reason or another:
    • An article from Pew Pew Tactical on the history of the fighting tomahawk. Not very much on the origin of the tomahawk but what happened after it was introduced to America and its use since. The author also has some recommendations on current manufactured models. 
    • "The Myth of 'Stupid Places and Stupid People'." Notwithstanding the title, this article actually examines the myth that compliance with a criminal will keep you safe. As for Farnam's rules of self defense, I disagree with the author's assertion it is a "myth". Of course it doesn't guarantee that you won't be a victim of violent crime. But if you don't go to bars or other places rowdy, drunk people congregate (especially if you accompany people who like to pick fights); walk through alleyways in the crime infested areas of town after dark; hang around gangbangers; or visit drug dealers, your life will be a hell of lot safer than those who do those things. 
    • "Casing a Joint: Why You Should Sit Facing the Door." More than just an explanation of why you should sit facing the door (or the cash register, as Greg adds), it offers some advice on situational awareness and evaluating the security of buildings that you may visit.
    • "Nine Generations of American Firearms Culture." A brief overview of the technology, laws, and public attitudes concerning firearms for 9 periods of time in America. Of course, you can't really understand the changes if you don't include migration and urbanization, because people coming from countries without a history of firearm ownership and people living in congested urban centers have different attitudes toward firearms from those living in small towns or the countryside. And video games. Imagine how different things would be if you didn't have a few generations of young men playing first person shooters who wanted to own copies or clones of the weapons they used in those games. 
    • "27 Statistics on Gunshot Wounds: How Much Does It Cost to Get Shot?" This article is from 2021, but appears to be referencing studies looking at hospitalizations for gunshot wounds between 2004 and 2013.  But with that data set, it has some interesting statistics, including the following:

They found that there was an annual rate of 10.1 admissions per 100,000 people in the US. While this might fluctuate in a given year, they noted that it remained fairly stable across the reporting period. More than 80% of hospitalizations were for people between the ages of 15-44. They also noted that males were 9 times more likely to be admitted for this, and African American populations were 10 times more likely than white populations to suffer from gunshot wounds when admitted.  

 As has been noted by others, we don't have a gun problem, we have a problem with certain sub-set of our population: ethnic street gangs.

  • "Inside the Mind of a Home Defense Shooting," which can be best summed up: "A home-invasion gunfight is not only a physical event — it is a neurobiological upheaval."
  • "Up Close & Too Personal" which has some tips on shooting at contact or near contact distances (e.g., less than 3 feet). 
  • "Which Is Better in 2026: 9mm Luger or 45 ACP?" The debate rages on, but at least this article gives you lots of information on kinetic energy, penetration in ballistic gel, and kinetic energy transfer. But I have to agree with Greg that most of this is b.s. when applied to handgun bullets. Unless you are talking about high velocity rifle bullets, energy transfer is of little relevance. What you want is something that makes a big hole and penetrates far enough to damage vital organs. And penetration is, itself, hard to predict because it depends on many factors: velocity, density, momentum, the shape of the bullet, the medium that is struck, etc. Bullet expansion, when discussing modern hollowpoints, largely depends on velocity and the starting diameter of the projectile. In that regard, the 9mm has the advantage over the .45 ACP when it comes to velocity, but the .45 ACP has an obvious advantage over the 9mm when it comes to starting diameter. Greg lists the factors he looks for in a defensive cartridge and it seems a pretty good list of criteria.
  • Next up is John Wilder's latest piece, "Your Chatbot Is Cute. Theirs Is a Chained God. Here’s Why That Changes Everything," in which he extrapolates from prior technological breakthroughs what will be the end result of the AI revolution: a feudal like society where the ultra-wealth and powerful elites have god-like AIs at their command to further grow and protect their power and wealth while the 99.9999% of humanity is reduced to serfdom. (Assuming, I would add, that the elites even allow most of humanity to continue to live: "Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature" was one of the tenets on the Georgia Guidestones). John explains:

        For the ultra-wealthy and national governments (which are basically the same thing at that scale), the A.I. of the future won’t be the public chatbot.  It will be a custom, proprietary, always-on system with access to individual datasets, massive private compute clusters, and real-time integration into their empires.  Imagine an A.I. that doesn’t just answer questions:  it anticipates needs across global supply chains, optimizes investments with keen foresight, runs entire divisions of virtual employees, and even simulates political and market outcomes with terrifying accuracy.

    [snip]

        The rest of us?  We’ll get the consumer version.  The good enough.  Best Value® A.I.:  the one that’s rate-limited, censored in annoying ways, and always trying to sell me something or nudge me toward approved opinions.  It’ll be helpful for writing emails or generating images of cats on porches, but it won’t be the strategic weapon the elites wield.

        This isn’t conspiracy, it’s simply the outcome of every technological advancement, ever, scaled to the size required by A.I. 
     ...  

    But the consequence will be a permanent divide between the elites and those destined to be the Morlocks. As John goes on to explain, the only thing preventing such a split previously has been the dispersion of talent among humanity--talent needed by the elites and society--allowing a path out of poverty. But "[w]hen the rich have A.I. that can do most of that thinking better, faster, and without needing health insurance or vacation days, the demand for actual human talent craters."  And, with it, "[t]he path to becoming rich effectively dies for 99.999% of humanity." 

        Don't dismiss this lightly. It is already beginning to happen (see "Vast desert city [ed: Phoenix] known for offering 'ladder to the middle class' with its back office jobs is at risk of being hollowed out by AI and offshoring"--Daily Mail). 

        John lists some steps to protect yourself from becoming wholly irrelevant, so be sure to read his whole article.  

    In their book The Highest Exam, Jia and Li, following standard sociological literature, identify three such factors: merit, connections, and luck. The importance of luck is often underestimated. It’s natural for successful people to claim (and even believe) that their achievements are entirely due to their brilliance and hard work. (On this topic, I recommend reading Success and Luck: Good Fortune and the Myth of Meritocracy by Robert H. Frank.) But it’s hard to quantify the effect of luck, and in statistical analyses we often have to assign the unexplained, residual variance to this factor.

    Merit, on the other hand is, in principle, measurable. Different professions use a variety of metrics to rank people by merit. In academia, which I know well, the department head usually has a point system of assigning merit to each faculty, based on their publications (and how many citations they get), getting research proposals funded, serving on committees, and such. In my department this system was known to the faculty and generally agreed to be fair.

    This leaves us connections, which is an important, but not the only component of, more generally, social power. After all, there are four sources of social power. One can advance up the hierarchy by means of coercion, economic power, and persuasion (threatening or intimidating people, paying them off, or talking them over to one’s side). Still, the political or relational form of power — being embedded in a power network — is, of course, most important. ...

Turchin goes on to explain that the mix of three (at least for admission to an elite university) varies in different countries, but all three play a role. He then dissects his experience getting into an elite university in the Soviet Union. An interesting point he touches on (although it didn't seem to impact his advancement) is the role of bad connections. Turchin's father had become a Soviet dissident by the time Turchin was trying to get into college, which he recognizes could have cut against him in his quest to get into Moscow University (although it apparently didn't since he was eventually admitted). But I remember reading several years ago that the U.S. elite universities actually discriminated in their admissions against young people who had been in Future Farmers of America, the Boy Scouts, and certain other organizations that were markers of a rural and/or conservative upbringing.

The Continued Collapse Of The British Empire

It is somewhat amazing to realize that even just 100 years ago, the sun still did not set on the British Empire. But the costs of two world wars was enough to kill the Empire. But Empires generally do not just disappear overnight. The Roman Empire wound down over the course of a centuries with the eastern half (the Byzantine Empire) holding out for many centuries longer. Even the sudden collapse of civilizations in the Bronze Age Collapse played out over 100 years or more. So it is interesting to see the U.K. continue to shuffle toward dissolution with this latest bit of news: "Scottish parliament backs call for new independence referendum."  The article reports:

    The Scottish parliament has voted in favour of a motion calling on the UK Government in London to approve a fresh referendum on independence.

    Lawmakers in the devolved legislature in Edinburgh backed the proposal by 72 votes to 55 on Tuesday. The body holds powers over policy areas including health, education, justice, transport and the environment.

    The motion was introduced by First Minister John Swinney, who leads the pro-independence Scottish National Party (SNP). 

    "With the mandate of parliament, I will now take that forward to dialogue with the UK government to make sure that parliament’s wishes, which, of course, are the wishes of the people, are properly put into effect,” he said.  

An unsuccessful referendum had been held in 2014, and a 2022  ruling from the UK Supreme Court held that any new independence referendum could only take place with the consent of the UK Government. Interestingly, though, this referendum isn't driven for a desire for more freedom, but less:

After Tuesday’s vote, Swinney said Scotland needed to gain independence before the next UK general election, expected in 2029, citing the threat that Nigel Farage’s anti-immigration, anti-EU Reform UK party could win power.   

The College Fix: More Legal Scholars Now Agree With Trump On Birth-Right Citizenship

 Here's the article: "Growing numbers of legal scholars support Trump’s order on birthright citizenship." The key takeaway is that Trump was able to shift the Overton Window as to who is entitled to birthright citizenship. Trump's order "prohibits federal agencies from recognizing citizenship for children born in the United States after Feb. 20, 2025, if their mother is unlawfully present and the father is neither a citizen nor a lawful permanent resident, or if the mother’s presence is temporary and the father lacks that status." 

Thursday, May 28, 2026

Belgium's Gulag Archipelago

In 2012, the Institute For Public Affairs published an article entitled "The Soviet Origins of Hate-Speech Laws." It outlines how the initial efforts of Western countries to enshrine free speech into international law was opposed by the Soviet Union and other tyrannical countries which, over the years introduced restrictions on speech, often set out as restrictions on hate and discrimination. Yet, as the authors observe:

... But we must not take them at face value. The concept of ‘hate speech’ (and the concepts which are drawn from it, such as group defamation) was deliberately and explicitly political. Article 20 has its origins in a clash between two worldviews—that held by Western capitalist countries which supported individual rights and liberties, and that held by the Communist bloc, which did not.

It did not end with the declarations and agreements on human rights. Over objections from Western powers that it was inappropriate and unnecessary to use speech laws to legislate morality, the protections of speech under international law was whittled away. The article notes, for instance, that "[t]he same occurred during the drafting of the International Convention for the Elimination of all Racial Discrimination. Here the restriction on freedom of speech is even more strident. All signatories must ‘declare an offence punishable by law all dissemination of ideas based on racial superiority or hatred, incitement to racial discrimination.’"

    The article wraps up:

    In 1948, as the Soviet Union was trying to place restrictions on speech in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Gulag system held 2.2 million people. The year the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights was approved by the United Nations, 1966, was the same year that two satirists, Andrei Sinyavsky and Yuli Daniel, were put on trial, sparking the late Soviet dissident movement. ‘It is a sad reflection on Europe’, writes the Danish human rights advocate Jacob Mchangama, ‘that the increasing emphasis on criminalizing words that wound, offend, or hurt is the brainchild of the very totalitarian states with which Western European states were locked in an ideological battle during the Cold War.’ The human rights movement to restrict hate speech and racial discrimination was an ideological power play by the Communist Bloc that was looking for human rights law to approve the suppression of political dissent. The adoption of hate speech restrictions was not intended to liberate minorities (as so many contemporary human rights advocates claim), but to restrain democrats.

    In the decade following the two conventions, Western countries adopted their own forms of racial discrimination laws which prohibited, to varying degrees, ‘hatred’ or ‘discrimination’. The United Kingdom, Canada, New Zealand, and Europe adopted prohibitions to protect racial or other groups. Of the major Western nations, only the United States now has no prohibition against hate speech.

Understanding the origin of hate speech laws and their purpose--to protect dictators and tyrants--is key to understanding the prosecution and conviction of former Belgian politician "Dries Van Langenhove of hate speech for a lecture in which he presented data and arguments about racial differences, migration and gender."According to the article:

Van Langenhove was found guilty on two counts under Belgium’s 1981 Anti-Racism Law: Incitement to hatred or violence against a group on grounds of nationality, so-called race, skin colour, origin or ethnic descent (charge A), and dissemination of ideas based on racial superiority or racial hatred (charge C). He was acquitted on the gender-related charge (B). 

And what were the grounds for this.

  • "Van Langenhove argued that differences between groups are not primarily the result of structural racism but rather stem from inherent group differences, a perspective that was presented as part of a broader critique of multiculturalism and progressive policies."
  • "He made the observation that people of colour generally are worse off than white people, something his political detractors also claim, though they disagree about the root causes."
  • "Van Langenhove also linked mass migration to declining school standards, insecurity, prison overcrowding and strain on social security."
  • "He dismissed the prevailing explanation of structural racism, stating: 'You can almost not blame them for thinking that way, because their most fundamental premises, their framework, that of egalitarianism. Once you start with that, you can’t build anything on it, because it’s already wrong from the start. These people are not equal, they are not equal and they will never be equal'."

This was too much for the judges presiding over the case:

    In its verdict, the court stated that Van Langenhove’s arguments were not merely controversial but crossed into criminal territory by promoting hatred and racial superiority.

    The judges wrote that “For an act to be punishable, it is not necessary for the defendant to have openly incited others to commit specific acts of hatred or violence… It is sufficient that others are incited to adopt a general attitude of intolerance or aversion towards the targeted group of persons.”  

    The judges acknowledged that political speech enjoys strong protection under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Belgian Constitution, but ruled that Van Langenhove’s remarks were criminal.

    They concluded he had the specific intent to incite hatred, dismissing his disclaimers (such as welcoming everyone to his youth projects regardless of background) as attempts to shield himself from prosecution. The court held that his overall message promoted a hierarchy of groups and attributed societal problems to the presence of certain populations. 

You will note that the court was not saying that Van Langenhove incited violence against immigrant groups, but incited his listeners to have thoughts and beliefs other than those approved by the government.

    But, again, the purpose of hate speech laws is not to protect people but to protect governments. In this case, to protect government programs and policies concerning immigration, criminal justice, and so on, from public criticism. The question that needs asking is why such a critique not allowed. Is it because there is some nefarious plot that requires Western nations to be overrun by migrants or is it more banal such as protecting politicians and government workers from losing their jobs? Or just a general practice of reflexively squashing dissent not matter what form it takes?

    Paul Joseph Watson also has some thoughts about this case in the video below. But as he notes, the prosecution was not required to prove that anything that Van Langenhove asserted was false. "Under the law, merely suggesting that increased diversity leads to anything other than wondrous benefits to society is a criminal offense. For Van Langenhov to have committed a crime, it is not necessary for him to have incited concrete acts of hate or violence. It suffices that others are incited to take on a general attitude of intolerance or disapproval regarding a group protected under the criteria of the anti-racism law. Yes, in Belgium, it's literally a crime to say that diversity isn't our greatest strength." 

 VIDEO: "He Said The Unspeakable"
m o d e r n i t y (7 min.)

Who Let The Dogs Out?

A couple stories from earlier this week of the same incident where a dog shot a woman with a shotgun:

The New York Post article relates:

    The pooch, its owner and a passenger pulled into Short Stop, a baseball-themed gas station and convenience store, in Scottsbluff just before noon — when the owner popped into the store. 

    The curious canine quickly started to rifle around in the back seat and came across a shotgun. Somehow, the pooch popped off several shots straight through the passenger side door, according to police reports obtained by KNOP.

    The truck’s passenger who had lingered near the truck while waiting for the driver, watched in apparent bewilderment as the dog opened fire. 

    One shot soared across the gas station and reportedly struck a woman waiting at a nearby traffic light.

    Scottsbluff police were originally told that someone had fired a BB gun, but realized the severity of situation when they found the shellshocked dog and a smoking shotgun.

    The lone victim was shot in the arm and hospitalized with a non-life-threatening injury, the outlet reported. 

The other article relates:

    According to police, the dog moved across the truck and accidentally triggered the firearm, causing it to fire through the passenger-side door.

    At that exact moment, a woman waiting at a nearby red light had her arm resting outside her car window. One shotgun pellet struck her upper arm, and she was taken to Regional West Medical Center with non-life-threatening injuries.

    Authorities said the investigation is ongoing and reminded residents that transporting a loaded shotgun inside a vehicle is illegal in Nebraska.

The article from the Post seems to have exaggerated the situation, making it sound like several shots were fired whereas it was probably just the single shot described in the second article. Fortunately no one was seriously injured. But leaving a cocked weapon with a loaded chamber in the back of the vehicle is irresponsible, in my opinion. I've seen articles of similar incidents in the past where dogs have stepped on or dragged a shotgun or rifle causing it to discharge with tragic results. Although the article is silent on this point, it does not seem that the shotgun was in a case or scabbard of any sort, either, which might have prevented the incident. 

Canada And Godwin's Law

Godwin's Law states: "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one." But sometimes such comparisons are appropriate. Take, for instance, Canada. 

    The Kupferberg Holocaust Center has an article concerning the murder of the disabled in concentration camps that relates

    The Nazis considered people with disabilities to be “useless eaters” and a burden on the Aryan race. In order to purify German society, Hitler authorized the secret killing of psychiatric patients beginning in October 1939. The Nazi Euthanasia Program became known as Aktion T4 (named after the coordinating Chancellery office at Tiergartenstrasse 4 in Berlin) and marked Nazi Germany’s first campaign of mass murder. T4 initially targeted developmentally disabled infants and toddlers in Germany, but later included adults with disabilities all across Europe.

    German doctors and nurses played key roles, killing 250,000 people in a program that was euphemistically labeled as euthanasia. Many of these murders occurred even after Hitler publicly suspended the operation in August 1941. Physicians evaluated patients in asylums, hospitals, and nursing homes where anyone deemed unable to work or harmful to German society was taken to remote killing stations. Many were murdered in specially constructed gas chambers, while others were killed by lethal injection and systematic starvation. ...
  

     Canada may not have the concentration camps, but it has its Medical Assistance In Dying (MAID) program, which the Canadian government describes thusly:

    Medical assistance in dying (MAID) is a process that allows someone who is found eligible to be able to receive assistance from a medical practitioner in ending their life. The federal Criminal Code of Canada permits this to take place only under very specific circumstances and rules. Anyone requesting this service must meet specific eligibility criteria to receive medical assistance in dying. Any medical practitioner who administers an assisted death to someone must satisfy certain safeguards first.

    Only medical practitioners are permitted to conduct assessments and to provide medical assistance in dying. This can be a physician or a nurse practitioner, where provinces and territories allow. 

And the Canadian government will pay for it, to boot. 

    It was sold to the public as a program only for the worst cases among those nearing the end of life, but it has not remained that way. In their 2025 essay, "The Cautionary Tale of Euthanasia in Canada," by Levi Minderhoud and Daniel Zekveld, they relate:

    Euthanasia [under the program] was first intended only for those nearing the end of their lives. Now, Canada has one of the most permissive euthanasia policies in the world, revealing a rapidly increasing culture of not just accepting death, but actively promoting it.

    Veterans have called the Ministry of Veterans Affairs looking for help and been offered euthanasia instead. Those with suicidal ideation have gone to the hospital for help, only to be encouraged to consider euthanasia. A woman was even asked if she was aware of the option of euthanasia before going into cancer-removing surgery. 

They continue:

    MAiD was first legalized in 2016 for Canadians whose death was “reasonably foreseeable.” At the time, a person had to have a grievous and irremediable medical condition which caused enduring physical or psychological suffering to qualify for euthanasia. Think of someone with a terminal cancer prognosis.

    In 2021, just five years after legalization, MAiD was expanded to include those whose “death is not reasonably foreseeable.” With this expansion, people with disabilities or non-terminal illnesses could choose to have a doctor end their lives. Think of someone who is wheelchair bound.

    The next expansion has already been passed into law, but implementation has been delayed until March 17, 2027. This would allow Canadians suffering solely from a mental illness to be eligible for euthanasia. Think of someone suffering from depression.

    Since legalization, the number of euthanasia deaths in Canada has steadily grown every year and showed little sign of slowing down. Between 2016 and 2023, over 60,000 Canadians have been euthanized, with over 15,000 in 2023 alone. Euthanasia now accounts for 4.7% of all deaths in the country, a rate second only to the Netherlands. Euthanasia is now the fifth most common cause of death in Canada. Compare these numbers with Oregon, the first American state to legalize assisted suicide in 1997. In 2023, 367 people died by assisted suicide in Oregon, or just 0.8% of all deaths in the state.

Well whether the implementation for mental illness is not supposed to be until 2027 is probably a moot point as it seems to already be a de facto criteria. Thus, we read in the Daily Mail this week: "Canadian doctor met man, 45, suffering from IBD and depression outside Tim Hortons and took him to be EUTHANIZED." The article recounts: 

    A Canadian doctor euthanized a man suffering from inflammatory bowel disease and depression after assessing him outside a Tim Hortons, according to officials. 

    Dr James MacLean has been placed under mandatory clinical supervision for six months following allegations that he improperly administered Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) to two patients.

    MacLean was investigated after he approved Thomas Dillon, who had Crohn's disease, for euthanasia. 

    Dillon, 45, was deemed eligible for MAID by MacLean and a nurse practitioner due to his condition, which led to persistent complications with a colostomy bag, according to medical records obtained by the Globe and Mail. 

    He also had a history of alcohol abuse, suicidal ideation and depression, according to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) report.

    MacLean conducted the MAID assessment outside a Tim Hortons in June 2023 and he was found eligible for the procedure under 'track 2', designed for patients who are not expected to die imminently but who will suffer grievously from an incurable condition.

    He then exchanged dozens of text messages about plans for him to be medically euthanized, records showed, which culminated in the doctor personally driving Dillon to a morgue facility in London to undergo the procedure.

    The doctor administered a lethal cocktail of drugs into Dillon's system in January 2024, inside a holding facility room in an industrial unit where human cadavers are prepared for funeral homes, officials said. 

    Well, some will argue, you can't really compare Canada to Nazi Germany on this issue because Canada's MAID laws require the person to be an adult (i.e., 18 years or more older). But even that is under discussion, with some medical professionals asserting it should be extended to "mature minors" and "the Quebec College of Physicians (CMQ) has raised the idea of extending current MAiD practices to cover infants under one year old in cases of 'severe deformities.'" 

    And I've discussed before the racist nature of MAID in that even the Canadian government acknowledges that 95.6% of the people being killed under the MAID are white.  

    In the end, what will be the real difference between Germany's Aktion T4 and Canada's MAID? That one government was comprised of national socialists and the other is international socialists? That just means that one government favored Germans and the other hates Canadians. 

Summer Carry For Women

Stavroula ("Stav") MacQuarrie of the  She Equips Herself YouTube channel, discusses some different methods and holsters she uses ...