From the Washington Examiner (via MSN): "Politics without restraint: A generational shift toward violence and radicalism is taking place." Samuel Abrams writes:
I recently walked into my politics class at Sarah Lawrence College prepared to discuss civic protest. The prompt was Minneapolis, where a recent immigration enforcement surge has sparked mass demonstrations, a general strike, and the fatal shooting of two civilians by federal agents.
I planned to cover basic principles: the right to protest, the obligation to remain nonviolent, the distinction between civil disobedience and coercion. My students rejected the premise almost immediately.
“What are we supposed to do?” one asked. “Hold signs while people are being shot?”
“You’re asking us to play by rules that only we follow,” another said.
They cited the Black Panthers. They invoked Stonewall. They argued, confidently, that throughout American history, violence or the credible threat of it was what forced change. Several endorsed armed confrontation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement as both effective and ethically justified.
This view dominated the discussion.
I have spent 20 years studying these attitudes in survey data. But numbers do not argue back. What I encountered that day around the seminar table was the data made flesh: Students who spoke about political violence not with reluctance or regret, but with moral certainty.
Abrams notes this isn't just his class. " Over one-third of students now say using violence to stop a campus speaker is acceptable. Nineteen percent of adults under 30 believe political violence is sometimes justified, compared with just 3% of those 65 and older. Republican and Democratic students increasingly converge in their willingness to excuse force, even as they target different opponents. It is a generational shift."
And they aren't learning this just from radical publications, but from the elites (particularly those on the left). Consider:
Last
month, Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner issued a statement
that would have been unthinkable from a major American law-enforcement
official a generation ago. Speaking about federal immigration agents,
Krasner declared: “In a country of 350 million, we outnumber them. If we
have to hunt you down the way they hunted down Nazis for decades, we
will find your identities. We will find you. We will achieve justice.”
This
was not a call for lawful accountability, but a threat of extrajudicial
pursuit with language more suited to revolutionary tribunals than a
constitutional republic. His sheriff followed with a blunt endorsement:
“You don’t want this smoke.”
He continues:
What I am describing is the erosion of a foundational American norm: The belief that political opponents, however wrong they may be, remain legitimate participants in a shared civic order, and that conflict must be governed by law rather than resolved through intimidation or violence.
What we are witnessing is not ideological polarization so much as affective polarization, the transformation of political disagreement into moral hatred in which opponents are no longer seen as mistaken fellow citizens but as illegitimate and dangerous enemies. When that norm collapses, politics does not become more just, it becomes more primitive.
Abrams believes there is a peaceful way out, but it involves the middle--which have not radicalized--stepping up their participation. He notes, for instance, that the the election that Krasner a third term only had a 15% turnout. "A small activist cohort selected officials [and] empowered him to speak in the name of the city. The same pattern now repeats across school boards, city councils, party committees, and faculty senates nationwide."
Read the whole thing.
Related:
- "Driver armed with a flamethrower rams LADWP substation in possible ‘terrorism-related event’"--New York Post. "A man, who was wearing 'soft body armor' and had two shotguns and an assault rifle-style pistol, was found dead in the car suffering from a self-inflicted gunshot wound."
- "Idaho woman accused of attempting to set fire to DHS building with stolen ambulance"--Fox News. The building was mostly filled with medical offices located next to a hospital, with DHS only just having rented some space.
Sarah Elizabeth George, 43, of Boise, is accused of stealing a Canyon County Paramedics ambulance from outside St. Luke’s Meridian around 11 p.m. on Feb. 18, crashing it through the entrance of the Portico North building and pouring gasoline across the lobby floor before fleeing on foot, according to a federal criminal complaint.
- Another unprovoked black on white attack: "Mom describes moment maniac with long criminal history slashed her 13-year-old son's throat in an unprovoked attack"--Daily Mail. Another millimeter deeper and the boy would likely have died. As the article notes: "The attack comes amid a series of seemingly random, unprovoked, deadly attacks, including the killing of a Ukrainian refugee on a train in Charlotte in September 2025, and a stabbing spree on the New York City subway in January 2025."