Monday, March 30, 2026

Repurposing Gateway to the SkyFall Mission

So more on the demise of the Lunar Gateway station and the planned Mars SkyFall mission. From Ars Technica:

    The centerpiece of Gateway, called the Power and Propulsion Element, is closest to being ready for launch. NASA’s rejigged exploration roadmap, revealed Tuesday in an all-day event at NASA headquarters in Washington, calls for repurposing the core module for a nuclear-electric propulsion demonstration in deep space.

[snip]

    “We will launch the first-of-its-kind interplanetary mission called SR-1 Freedom before the end of 2028, demonstrating fission power and the extraordinary capabilities to move mass efficiently in space,” said NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman.

    NASA will cannibalize the core module of Gateway for the SR-1 mission. The Power and Propulsion Element, or PPE, is under construction at Lanteris Space Systems in Palo Alto, California. The module will have the most powerful electric propulsion system ever flown in space, with three 12-kilowatt engines and four 6-kilowatt thrusters. The PPE would have originally relied entirely on solar power. Under NASA’s new plan, it will have solar arrays and a uranium-fueled fission reactor.

    The goal for SR-1 Freedom is to “prove the US can build, launch, and operate a nuclear propulsion system,” laying the “foundation” for more capable missions to follow, said Steve Sinacore, NASA’s program executive for space reactors. Launch is just 33 months away. 

Secret Combinations And High Tech

If you follow Anonymous Conservative's blog you know that in addition to his application of evolutionary biology to explain the differences between conservatives and liberals, he has long suggested the existence of a domestic surveillance program akin to the East German Stasi operating inside the United States. 

    As part of this, Anonymous Conservative has argued that this group (or groups) possess high technology items generally unknown to the public, such as the device used to cause the Havana Syndrome--and he did so long before the reports of Havana Syndrome appeared in the mass media and before U.S. intelligence was able to procure one of the devices from a weapons dealer. But how could a secretive group have developed devices otherwise unknown to science? A recent article at the Unz Review, entitled "The UFO Question and the Architecture of Secrecy" by Adrian Soler provides a possible explanation. 

    Soler does not set out to prove one way or the other whether UFOs are real, or whether they represent natural phenomena (e.g., plasmoids) or artificial; merely to point out that the military believes there is something to it because even as they have denied the existence of UFOs, they have maintained formal procedures for reporting such incidents. From there, he addresses some of the theories as to what are the source of UFOs. One of these is that it represents a small group or groups that have developed and use technological devices well beyond that of society as whole--what is termed the breakaway civilization hypothesis. He believes there are two main reasons that support the breakaway civilization hypothesis, of which the second is germane to this discussion:

... The breakaway civilization concept, stripped of its most speculative elements, describes a real dynamic that has been documented in other domains. Special Access Programs, by their nature, create cognitive and operational gaps between those inside and those outside. Christopher Mellon, whose credibility on such matters is as high as anyone currently in public discourse, has described programs so compartmentalized that their existence was unknown to officials with extremely high clearances. Eric Weinstein, whose intellectual caution distinguishes him from the more credulous corners of the disclosure ecosystem, has argued that certain physics research programs were effectively captured by the national security state in the mid-twentieth century and have been operating in isolation from the public scientific community ever since. If that is true — and Weinstein argues it with some care — then a faction with access to that research would, over the course of seventy years, have developed capabilities that would appear genuinely alien to the rest of humanity. The breakaway, in other words, does not require exotic origins. It requires only the ordinary dynamics of institutional secrecy, applied to extraordinary technology, over a sufficient period of time.     

Given the size of the federal budget and the extreme levels of fraud and waste which we have seen in relatively small federal government programs, it would be easy for a secretive cabal to exist undetected. And that is not even including the legitimate "black budget" estimated to be about $50 billion per year. 

  • Flashback: "User Clip: Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld - 2.3 Trillion Missing"--CSPAN (2001).
  • Flashback: "Why Can’t the Pentagon Pass An Audit?"--Taxpayers for Common Sense (2000). Notes, among other things, that "the Pentagon’s books are in such poor shape that the military’s money managers last year made almost $7 trillion in adjustments to their financial ledgers in an attempt in make them add up. The Inspector General also concluded the Pentagon could not show receipts for $2.3 trillion of those changes and half a trillion dollars of the adjustments were corrections of earlier mistakes." It also notes that almost half of the other large government agencies were in similar shape. 

VIDEO: Multi-Cam--When Your Camo Pattern Is Too Good

This video begins by discussing the origins of MultiCam and why it is so effective before moving on to the real topic of the video: that the effectiveness of MultiCam has created the problem that many militaries have adopted it or something very similar, which makes it difficult to distinguish between the troops of different countries by their uniforms. The two main results is that (1) it can be hard to distinguish between combatants (which is why in Ukraine they have resorted to wearing colored arm bands) or even troops of allied countries. The main issue in the latter case seems to be the impact on the esprit de corps of not having sufficiently distinguishable uniforms. 
 

 VIDEO: "Why Multicam Is Hated (Even Though It's Effective!)"
Baltic Defence Review (12 min.)

VIDEO: Best "Militia" Rifle

Maybe it is a sign of his politics, but James Reeves of TFB TV went to Aaron of Administrative Results, Ian McCollum of Forgotten Weapons, and Karl Casarda of In Range TV, to ask them which of four rifles--the M16, AK47, FN FAL, and HK G3--would be best for a "militia". And by "militia" they mean conscripts for a warlord or revolutionary movement of some sort ranging from 17 to 60 years old with no prior training or experience with shooting. And the location could potentially be anywhere in the world. All four ranked the weapons the same with the AK47 being the top choice. 

I was a bit disappointed after I realized the true subject of the video, because I was hoping it might discuss good rifles for Americans rather than what would be appropriate for third world populations and liberals with nose rings.   

 VIDEO: "Ian vs Karl vs. Admin: What's the Best Militia Rifle?"
TFB TV (13 min.)

Sunday, March 29, 2026

Gun & Prepping News #74

Just some gun and prepping related links that I thought interesting or useful:

    I believe the draw stroke is the most important physical skill you can learn for self-defense, but it doesn’t do you much good if you can’t put it into some kind of real world context. The typical violent attack happens unexpectedly at conversational distance with one, or maybe two attackers. So once you have the fundamentals down for basic gun handling and marksmanship, and then a good draw stroke, the second most important self-defense skill you can practice is following the draw stroke with multiple accurate rapid shots at close range.

    Now in reality, you might not have to actually fire after you draw, so we have to sometimes practice drawing the gun straight to a low ready position. For obvious reasons, it could be problematic if we were to develop an automatic reflex where we have to fire every time the gun comes out of the holster.

    But for those scenarios that do require shots to be fired in self-defense, most of them don’t involve technically difficult feats of marksmanship or complex gun manipulations. It can be fun to practice the coolguy tactical ninja stuff, and eventually it’s good to push yourself and work in progressively more difficult drills and maybe even get into some competition shooting. But it’s possible to focus too much on the so-called “advanced” technical skills at the expense of being really proficient with the simple gun handling and shooting skills that get people out of 90% of the lethal force encounters that actually happen to non-uniformed citizens. 

    According to Silencer Shop’s ATF wait time tracker, updated on March 16, 2026, eForm 4 approvals over the last 30 days have been exceptionally fast. The numbers break down by applicant type, and the differences are worth understanding before you file.

    Individual filers are seeing the fastest approvals by a significant margin. Individual eForm 4s are currently returning in a range of 1 to 31 days, with a median of just 5 days. Read that again. Five days. That is not a typo, and it is not an outlier. That is the median, meaning half of individual filers are getting approved faster than that.

    Trust filers are moving quickly as well, though slightly slower than individuals. Trust eForm 4s are showing a wait range of two to 49 days, with a median of 25 days. Corporate filers land in a similar window, with a range of 21 to 43 days and a median of 28 days.

    Dealer-to-dealer Form 3 transfers have become nearly instantaneous. eForm 3 approvals are currently being processed in as little as 27 minutes, with a median of 15 hours and a maximum of about 4 days. For context, a fast Form 3 used to mean a few weeks. This changes how quickly a dealer can get inventory on hand and ready for customer transfer.

It’s hard for me to recommend this particular load to anyone, given that it’s both less accurate and more expensive than CCI Standard. Out of the same gun, CCI Standard outperforms ELEY’s 38‑grain Hollow Point in virtually every metric that matters. The only advantage I can point to for ELEY Subsonic over its less expensive American counterpart is that it’s noticeably quieter and consistently produces a slower projectile in the same firearms.

In all fairness, it seems more than accurate enough for killing pests within 50 yards. 
There’s a bit of a cult following for AR builds that clone the service rifle from the video game Fallout New Vegas. While the parts are available to make a pretty nice rifle, the game bayonet remains elusive. Let’s look at how you can make a stand-in, at least until I can convince some company to start making these for real. And trust me, I’ve been trying.

    The .30-30 cartridge was introduced in 1895, more than 130 years ago, and it has come a long way since then. The original loading saw a .30-caliber, 160-grain jacketed bullet pushed by 30 grains of smokeless powder. The result was a 1970 fps load that had a flatter trajectory than blackpowder loads of that era, hitting hard enough to take down big game despite the smaller bullet.

    Cartridge technology has come a long way since the 1890s, but so has the .30-30. While the casing’s dimensions haven’t changed, the bullets sure have. Originally loaded with blunt-nosed bullets due to the limitations of tube magazines, typical to most lever guns, you can now buy .30-30 rounds with streamlined, pointed bullets that extend the rifle’s practical range well past the 100 yards (or less) that shooters once restricted the round to. One of those new Hornady conical bullets, the 140-grain version, is also lead-free, so it can be used in states that require such ammunition.

  • "Guns And Reliability" by Will Dabbs, MD. Even the most reliable firearms can fail due to mechanical issues or user error. But ...

All this leads us to the most reliable guns around. A proper double-action revolver is just about fail-safe. A simple break-action single- or double-barrel long gun doesn’t have much to break either. The trigger/hammer mechanisms could theoretically burp, but they remain fully enclosed within the frame or receiver. So long as the ammunition is up to scratch, there is just very little left to fail. There are options aplenty in these platforms, and pricing spans the spectrum from surprisingly cheap to ludicrous. 

Some people online talk about having everything and the kitchen sink on their body just in case, but the reality is, you don't need everything under the sun. Instead of thinking you need everything, it's better to look at the bare minimum and what you need to get away from a dangerous situation. Some will argue you need 3-4 magazines on you with a baton, pepper spray and even flex cuffs, which is absolutely not needed. I think some people talk about carrying all these extra items because they fantasize about society crashing. Having a handgun and an extra magazine is more than enough to get you out of harm's way. If we are being realistic, you probably won't even need a spare magazine, but it's better to have one. 

    But lately, I’ve noticed you don’t see much talk about preparedness anymore. A check of online trend data verified my suspicion that far fewer people are talking about and searching for information on this important topic. So what gives?

    After lots of reflection and study, I finally realized it’s simple: fear and anxiety are just not sustainable because humans cannot remain in a heightened state of alarm indefinitely. In line with Col. Jeff Cooper’s Color Code, you can remain in a state of cautious awareness indefinitely, but once you psychologically elevate to alarm and eventually fear, you can remain for a short period of time before it all becomes too overwhelming. You have to simply give up and say, “To heck with it.” 

What is the threat? As a prepper hunkered down at your home, with food stores, the most likely threat will be from looters and marauders. These could take many forms from a simple beggar, through starving neighbors, mobs, tricks and deceptions, to a tactically organized group with weapons and equipment. The worst case is some sort of organized paramilitary style force with heavy equipment bent on forced redistribution. Therefore, remain flexible and have an emergency rally point and extraction route should you be overmatched. Know when you have no alternative but to bug out. You can make this decision if you have the information before the threat arrives and conduct the bug out in good order. Alternatively, you may be forced to make the decision as the attack progresses and have to ‘break contact’ and withdraw under enemy fire; this is one of the most difficult tactical maneuvers. Work on your leadership, decision making and decision points so that your response under the pressure of both time and enemy is optimal. Tied in with this is the need for clear rules of engagement and for the use of force appropriate to the threat.

  • "Hearing Aids after SHTF"--Blue Collar Prepping. The author notes that modern in-ear hearing aids use zinc/air cells as a power supply, which are both not rechargeable and necessarily, because of their size, don't last for very long. 

    The largest common zinc/air cell provides 845 milli-Watt-hour (mWh) of power. Compare that to a standard AAA at 1850 mWh or a standard AA at 4200 mWh, both of which can be found in rechargeable forms, and you'll see it's time to start looking for a solution that uses a more common battery.

    A quick search on Amazon found this pocket amplifier. At less than $30, it fits in a pocket, uses AAA batteries, and boosts sound by 110dB (enough to be painful). This would be worth looking into if you need a backup for your in-the-ear hearing aids. There are several others like it on Amazon; just search for “pocket hearing aid.” If your hearing is poor in both ears, look for one that has stereo microphones and ear plugs to help with your ability to locate the source of a noise.

 He also suggests electronic ear muffs, although noting it would be less comfortable. 

 The minimum amount of food you should have in your emergency supply is based on the number of people in your household and the duration you want to be prepared for. Here’s a general guideline:

  •     One Week Supply: When you are just getting started, at a minimum, aim to have enough food to sustain your family for a week. This is typically the initial period during which emergency services may not be readily available.
  •     Two-Week Supply or more: Once you have a week covered, consider expanding your supply to cover a few more weeks. This ensures you can endure longer disruptions and recovery periods.

Saturday, March 28, 2026

Weekend Reading #49

 Some longer and more involved reading for weekend:

  •  First up is Greg Ellifritz's Weekend Knowledge Dump for this weekend. The first article he links to is "Carrying Isn’t Enough: What Our Data Reveals About the Gap Between Carry and Capability" from A Girl And A Gun. Although the survey data the article discusses is that of women who train and carry a firearm, I suspect that it also applies to men. And the main point of the article is that although women were doing well at getting training and regular practice, "[w]hen respondents were asked how often they draw from a holster, the consistency we saw in other areas of training began to break down." 

    Approximately 45–55% of attendees reported that they rarely draw from a holster. At the same time, 20–30% indicated that their home range does not permit holster work, limiting their ability to practice this skill in a live-fire environment. Another 15–25% shared that their draw practice occurs primarily through dry fire, without consistent live-fire validation.

    When these responses are viewed together, the conclusion is clear. Roughly 40–60% of Conference attendees, women who are otherwise consistent in their training, are carrying regularly but not consistently practicing their drawstroke. 

 I'm less concerned about "live-fire validation" of dry-fire practice of the draw stroke than the fact that half (half!!!) "reported that they rarely draw from a holster." And this is from a group that is motivated enough to train that they are attending a national conference for women shooters! Drawing and presentation is mostly a dry fire activity. If you are only practicing drawing at the range, you are fooling yourself about how long it will take you to develop proficiency. Moreover, I would guess that a significant portion of shooters don't practice drawing at the range from their concealed carry setup in clothing that matches what they typically wear during the week. Again, that is why you do your dry fire practice. 

    With that aside, here are some other articles and links in Greg's post that caught my eye:

  • On the topic of dry fire practice, Greg links to a piece from Claude Werner on how he conducts dry fire practice when traveling. He has recommendations at to snap caps as well as a safety protocol that would probably be good to implement even if practicing at home.
  • There is a new Range Master newsletter. The drill(s) of the month on this month are based on the 1986 Miami Shoot Out. There is also a snub-nosed assessment drill (SAD) for those using short-barrelled revolvers (or, I would add, any pocket sized pistol). Also some discussion of a better cardboard target. There are other tidbits and short articles, so check it out.
  • An article on "What Is A Snub?"
  • An article on "Targets and Better Hits" that goes over ways to improve your targets and improve the quality of your hits. 
  • Some tips on what to do if you start having problems racking the slide on your semi-auto pistol. 
  • "Gun Owner 101: Holster Selection"--a good article on selecting a belt and holster--or, more realistically, belts and holsters.  
  • And an article, "Tangling With The Trigger" that argues that trigger control is more important than sight control. Which of course it is because it doesn't matter how good is your sight picture if you jerk the weapon off target when operating the trigger. 
There is a lot more, so be sure to check it out. 

Gospel Lessons: Why The Iran War Is Not Armageddon

I had noted recently that I did not believe that the current Iran conflict was the War of Armageddon because there were still too many other prophecies that had to occur before Armageddon that had not yet happened. In the video below from the Gospel Lessons YouTube channel, the author makes the same argument, but going into more detail. Rather, we are still in the wars and rumors of war phase. That does not mean that Armageddon might not come upon us quickly--remember how quickly the Soviet Empire fell apart--but that it is just not now. 

 VIDEO: "Wars and Rumors of Wars - Is the Israel Iran war the beginning of Armageddon?"
Gospel Lessons (10 min.)

Friday, March 27, 2026

The New American Based International Order

 Instapundit linked to X post from 10Δ of which it is worth taking note. He begins:

    3 weeks ago I argued the US goal in Iran is to seize the global oil spigot. Venezuela in January -> Iran in February. 

    Neutralize every supply channel outside the dollar system within 90 days. Achieve a compliant successor government and complete energy dominance.
    
    The oil thesis was the obvious layer. However, when you zoom out & view the last four years as a single sequence rather than isolated geopolitical events, the architecture of the grander US plan becomes visible.

He goes on to point out that the Ukraine War, destruction of the Nordstream pipeline, Syria, and Venezuela, all acted to cut off streams of oil and gas that lay outside the control of the United States. And now...

    If Iran falls & a successor government is installed that the US controls or influences (the Delcy model described weeks ago) then roughly 40 to 45 million barrels per day of global production out of 103 million is effectively under US control. OPEC becomes irrelevant because the US coalition is now the marginal producer. Now add the gas dimension & it goes beyond oil. 

    This war is solidifying the petrodollar system as it evolves into a hybrid petro/LNG-dollar. The old system was built on Saudi crude priced in USD. The new system is built on American crude plus American gas from the Gulf Coast, with no alternative supplier of comparable scale. The dependency is deeper because LNG infrastructure requires long term contracts & regasification terminals that lock buyers into supply relationships for decades. Europe & the Pacific allies (Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, etc.) cannot pivot away as there is nowhere left to pivot to. They're now locked into the US energy system.

And its now just Europe and the Pacific. China and Russia are likewise boxed in. He concludes:

    Israel & the [Gulf Cooperation Council countries] are absorbing the kinetic cost of a conflict whose primary beneficiary, counter to the mainstream narrative, is actually America (First). Qatar offline for 5 years reprices the entire global gas market in favor of US exporters for the remainder of the decade. The Gulf states face years of rebuilding. Europe faces its 2nd energy crisis in four years. 

    Sure, the average American might face temporary moderate inflation & higher gas prices. But if you are the architect of the US empire & you view the rise of China & Chinese ASI as an existential winner takes all scenario, the collateral damage is acceptable cost.

    Whoever controls the energy corridors controls the monetary system. Whoever controls the monetary system & the energy supply simultaneously controls the compute infrastructure that determines which civilization builds ASI first.

    The US is seizing all 3. 
   

A New Front Opened In the Iran War--In The U.S.

    The FBI said Alen Zheng, who is believed to have planted the device, is currently in China. He is facing charges of attempted damage to government property by fire or explosion, unlawful making of a destructive device and possession of an unregistered destructive device, which carry a potential sentence of up to 40 years in prison.

    FBI Tampa also arrested his sister, Ann Mary Zheng, who is charged with accessory after the fact and tampering with evidence, facing up to 30 years in prison.

 [snip]

 The pair's mother, who admitted to authorities that her son confessed to the plot, is currently in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) custody pending deportation for a visa overstay, but has not been criminally charged as of Thursday afternoon.

    “In the early hours of Operation Epic Fury last month, a deployed [flyaway kit of counter-UAS technologies] successfully detected and defeated sUAS [drones] operating over a strategic U.S. installation,” NORTHCOM chief Gen. Gregory M. Guillot reported to Congress last week.

    But 10 days later on March 9, Barksdale
[Air Force Base] implemented a “shelter-in-place” order after another drone incursion, 2nd Bomb Wing spokesman Capt. Hunter Rininger confirmed last week that “multiple unauthorized incursions” have happened since.

    “Between March 9-15, 2026, BAFB Security Forces observed multiple waves of 12-15 drones operating over sensitive areas of the installation, including the flight line, with aircraft displaying non-commercial signal characteristics, long-range control links and resistance to jamming,” a confidential briefing obtained by ABC News said. “After reaching multiple points across the installation, the drones dispersed across sensitive locations on the base.”

    The same briefing claimed that the drones were far more sophisticated than anything consumers can buy off the shelf. 

[snip] 

    According to ABC News, later incursions "lasted around four hours each day and the drones used varied routes of ingress and deliberate maneuvering within restricted airspace," and Barksdale had to suspend [B-52] operations against Iran. It's safe to assume that Barksdale's defenses in some way failed.

Thursday, March 26, 2026

Jeff Cooper's Defensive Pistolcraft Videos

I don't know if you have seen this, but a YouTube channel calling itself the Jeff Cooper Legacy Foundation has published a couple videos that are from a 1987 video tape series called "Defensive Pistolcraft" which was split into 4 volumes.  Each of the YouTube videos is about an hour and 48 minutes long. I haven't had time to watch them yet (they were only posted a couple days ago) but it looks like the first video has Volumes 1 & 2 and the second video has Volumes 3 & 4.  

 VIDEO: "Jeff Cooper's Defensive Pistolcraft Tape Series - Disk 1"
Jeff Cooper Legacy Foundation (1 hr. 47 min.) 

 

 VIDEO: "Jeff Cooper's Defensive Pistolcraft Tape Series - Disk 2"
Jeff Cooper Legacy Foundation (1 hr. 49 min.)

Repurposing Gateway to the SkyFall Mission

So more on the demise of the Lunar Gateway station and the planned Mars SkyFall mission. From Ars Technica :      The centerpiece of Gateway...