New Republic: "Violence is Coming? Sorry, It’s Already Here—and Getting Worse."

The New [People's] Republic magazine is running an article entitled "Violence is Coming? Sorry, It’s Already Here—and Getting Worse" by Deep State shill, Brynn Tannehill. Based on her writings, she apparently believes there is a white supremacist under every bed. And she is definitely Deep State: a graduate of the Naval Academy with a master's degree from the Air Force Institute of Technology, and currently an analyst with RAND. She is also gay, which probably explains her hatred of Christians. This latest piece is typical of international socialists: national socialists are everywhere and they are a threat to international socialism. But pretty much anyone that is not an international socialist falls within her definition of a national socialist. 

    She begins:

America has a gun violence problem. ...

Ignoring the elephant in the room, she skips right over the fact that the gun violence is mostly perpetrated by black gang members.  

... It also has a problem with right-wing violence, and the two come together all too often in the form of massacres of nonwhites, LGBTQ people, and Jewish people. ...

Again ignoring the disproportionate number of whites killed by blacks, or the massacres committed by LGBTQ and POC. 

... Given the trajectory of the country now, it’s only going to get worse over time. ...

Probably.  

The recent mass shooting in Jacksonville, Florida, by a shooter carrying swastika-adorned guns, ...

Perhaps he was Hindu. 

... only serves to highlight the issue once again: The American right has a violence problem, and they’re in deep denial about it.

"The number of white nationalist, neo-Nazi and anti-government extremist groups across the U.S. fell for a third straight year in 2021...." PBS (March 2022). "A recent Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) joint report that reviewed significant domestic terrorism incidents in the U.S. between 2015 and 2019 found that AVEs [Anarchist/left wing violent extremists] were among the extremist groups 'presenting the greatest threats of violence.'" George Washington University, Program on Extremism (Nov. 2021).

The United States has already missed the boat to limit violence by limiting access to guns. ...

Which has worked so effectively in such disparate countries as Mexico, Brazil, and South Africa. 

... The gun control debate is effectively over: ...

There never was a debate. It was always the Left screaming at conservatives that they (conservatives) were a bunch of child killers if they didn't just agree to the only the government and criminals having firearms and then making demands without giving up anything in return. 

... The Republican-appointed Supreme Court is whittling away what few restrictions on guns there are. This includes guaranteeing the rights of violent felons, domestic abusers under restraint orders, and the mentally ill to own assault rifles. ...

Lie. Also ignores Leftists politicians and judges releasing violent felons onto the street or simply not arresting or charging them in the first place.

... Every time a massacre happens, Republican governors decide the solution is greater access to firearms via open carry and concealed carry without a permit.

OMG! We can't trust the proletariat to have weapons! 

Thus the only way to combat these sorts of politically motivated killings is to push back against the people letting them happen. Unfortunately, that would be lethal to almost any GOP politician, and as such they’re as likely to do so as Donald Trump is to announce that he’s giving away all his worldly possessions, taking a vow of silence and poverty, and becoming a monk.

Strange that someone so adamantly anti-Christian would choose this metaphor. 

    She goes on to claim (based on propaganda from the Anti-Defamation League) that "right-wing ideologies are behind the vast majority of politically motivated shootings." Two points here. First, she (it, whatever) wants her readers to equate "right-wing ideologies" to anything conservatives support: two-parent households, sexual morality, protecting kids from perverts, etc. Second, it is interesting what is not included in political motivated murders. 

    For instance, the LGBTQ Nashville shooter is not considered to be a political motivated shooter, even though her attack on a Christian school was planned around the Trans "Day of Vengeance," because the shooters as-yet top secret manifesto doesn't contain anything political, Tannehill assures us.  She writes:

These writing have not been released yet, based on the requests of the victims’ families. Police, and sources I have spoken with on condition of anonymity who have seen the writings, 

[Told you she was Deep State--otherwise, why would they talk to her] 

say that they are not political and are mostly admiration of previous mass killers and plans for how to attack the school. Tennessee Bureau of Investigations director David Rausch told local sheriffs that “the material finds that the killer did not write about specific political, religious, or social issues. In fact, a primary focus in the journals is on idolizing those who committed prior school shootings.”

Yet the shooter told one of her friends that her manifesto would explain why she committed the shooting. But we are to believe that, in fact, there is no why, only how. 

    And why should we believe the ADL's statistics on anything. Even other Jews have pointed out that the ADL's own press releases are misleading and misstate their own research. Business Insider also noted in 2020 that "if you define 'extremist incidents' as incidents involving violence constituting a hate crime or terrorism, or incidents where a report of the incident refers to motivation by extremist views, just 58% of the incidents cited by the ADL over a 10-year-period fit that definition."

    And the ADL is quite liberal with the use of the "anti-Semitic" slur. The Daily Mail is reporting today that "Elon Musk sues the Anti-Defamation League for $22 BILLION for 'trying to kill X by falsely accusing it and me of being anti-Semitic': X owner sets up huge defamation battle with group." The ADL's complaint about Musk and X is that he has relaxed the censorship so people can better engage in free speech. Apparently, to the ADL, more free speech is anti-Semitic. In response, according to Musk, the ADL urged (threatened?) advertisers to keep away from X, which has resulted in significantly lower revenue. 

    The rest of her article is "January 6" and "Orange Man Bad" and law enforcement--both federal and local--is in cahoots with the national socialists (and she is not talking about their criminal informants and undercover officers).