"Real Men Don't Carry Pocket Pistols"--Lucky Gunner (4 min.)
I'm not sure if he is mocking someone in particular, or just the more general attitude that "I carry a .45 because they don't make a .46."
Exploring practical methods for preparing for the end times, including analysis of end time scripture and prophecy, current events, prepping and self-defense.
When the testimony of the Elders ceases to be given, and the Lord says to them, “Come home; I will now preach my own sermons to the nations of the earth,” all you now know can scarcely be called a preface to the sermon that will be preached with fire and sword, tempests, earthquakes, hail, rain, thunders and lightnings, and fearful destruction. What matters the destruction of a few railway cars? You will hear of magnificent cities, now idolized by the people, sinking in the earth, entombing the inhabitants. The sea will heave itself beyond its bounds, engulfing mighty cities. Famine will spread over the nations, and nation will rise up against nation, kingdom against kingdom, and states against states, in our own country and in foreign lands.(Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, Vol. 8, p. 123, July 15, 1860). Heber C. Kimball similarly explained that "[t]he judgments of God will be poured out upon the wicked to the extent that our elders from far and near will be called home." Orson Pratt made similar statements.
See, the subcompact Glock 26 and 27 were the first Glock handguns to introduce the molded-in finger grooves on the grip frontstrap and the dimpled “thumb rests” on the frames. This was done in order to gain enough “points” under an obscure rule instituted via the Gun Control Act of 1968. A breakdown of the point system can be found here on the NRA-ILA website, but basically due to its loss of points for size and weight, the sub-compact Glock 26 needed to gain them back some other way, and “target grips” were worth five points.
Compared to chemical batteries, micro-CAES systems have some interesting advantages. Most importantly, a distributed network of compressed air energy storage systems would be much more sustainable and environmentally friendly. Over their lifetimes, chemical batteries store only two to ten times the energy needed to manufacture them. Small-scale CAES systems do much better than that, mainly because of their much longer lifespan.
Furthermore, they do not require rare or toxic materials, and the hardware is easily recyclable. In addition, decentralised compressed air energy storage doesn’t need high-tech production lines and can be manufactured, installed and maintained by local business, unlike an energy storage system based on chemical batteries. Finally, micro-CAES has no self-discharge, is tolerant of a wider range of environments, and promises to be cheaper than chemical batteries.
The issue I see is the amount of electricity--particularly amperage--to run a compressor. You can trickle feed electricity to charge a battery from a solar system, but not have the amperage to run a compressor.
The laptop was confiscated, and the chief observer told investigators that the janitor 'feverishly started looking through the facility' when he realized it was missing.
The janitor began making paranoid comments about 'lax security at the facility' and said it was 'only a matter of time before the facility got hit'.
The chief observer became concerned for his personal safety after the janitor stated that he 'believed there was a serial killer in the area' and that the killer might enter the observatory and execute someone.
At that point the agencies that operate the facility decided to shut it down out of an abundance of caution.
The Kőbánya district of Budapest is situated on the eastern margins of the Hungarian capital city. Beneath Kőbánya there is an extensive limestone layer, in which tunnels and passages have been made, some of which appear to date from the 13th century. In the 19th century, the limestone caverns of Budapest-Kőbánya were used for the refrigeration of perishable goods in large quantities.
Protestantism, on the other hand, gave the believer far more legitimacy in public affairs and the theology of Protestantism expected the believer to behave act as one of the elect. There was no reliance on the confessional to wipe away misdeeds and poor behaviour was an outward sign of perdition which rightly disqualified a man from institutional office. The net effect of this "theological bias" in Protestant culture was attitude towards institutions which demanded honesty and efficiency.
Which brings us to the phenomenon of American Catholicism. The United States was founded as a Protestant Enlightenment project: the institutional culture is Protestant. While the country was explicitly secular, Protestantism was the de-facto institutional religion of the country and within its theological framework established it's habits, ideas and cultural practices. It was into this culture that the waves of Catholic migrants flooded and eventually became assimilated. However, the assimilation wasn't one way, Catholicism too had to adapt to the culture with the overall result that American Catholicism became Protestantised.
The result--and the disconnect--is that "[u]nlike Latin Catholicism, American Catholicism won't put up with institutional corruption."
Mark Uptain [the guide] appears to have relied on a can of bear spray to deter the attack. A can of bear spray, with the safety off, was found at the site. The adult sow grizzly had bear spray on her at the scene. The bear was shot and killed as she attacked investigating Fish and Wildlife personnel.
Many shooters, even those who train regularly, have never thought of what happens when the surface behind the target is removed because it is not something they have encountered. With no backstop, a laser equipped firearm can be aimed in such a way that the dot is not visible because it is projecting out into the space around the target and not on a surface that registers the dot. Think of a target on a stand in the middle of a pasture or large parking lot. The dot would not be visible unless it was projected on the target itself or the ground near the target. When this happens there is no visual feedback for adjusting the point of aim which can leave the unprepared shooter with fewer options.
This is why a correct presentation/draw stroke, even on a laser equipped firearm, involves acquiring the sights (or at least some form of coarse sight picture). The shooter finds the sights and only then, if the projected laser dot is visible, they may switch their focus to the target and dot. This technique mitigates failures on the part of the shooter to find the dot and failures of the laser itself. If there is no visible dot, the shooter is already on the sights.
I have to admit that I haven't used weapon mounted lasers much. I had heard anecdotes about how they greatly assisted sighting with small pistols with only rudimentary sights, but when my wife recently decided to carry a small .380 with laser sights, I was amazed how much faster it was for both of us to acquire the target when using the laser.
Fr. Thomas explained why sexual abuse of children is especially heinous. “By sexually abusing children, Satan desires to destroy the icon of the kingdom of God. He wants to destroy the most innocent version of humanity, which is the child,” he said.
The priest said that in his opinion, behavior that falls outside the bounds of what is conceivable -- like murder -- is also clearly demonic.
Some of these homosexual predators are, I think, possessed. Think about it. If you know anything about demonic activity, and this is something that lay people should not get too involved with, then you know that certain demons specialize in certain kinds of sins. They will attach themselves like spiritual lampreys to the souls of people who commit them and also to the places where the sins were committed. Once a demon gets hold, they claim the right to be there, until the layers of their connection are broken one by one. That’s what exorcism rites do: they break the legalistic claims of the Enemy to be there.
“We further deny that competency to teach on any biblical issue comes from any qualification for spiritual people other than clear understanding and simple communication of what is revealed in Scripture.”
It references the Bible over and over, contending “the priorities and mission of the largest evangelical denominations, churches, and seminaries in the United States” have “radically changed” in recent years.
“Seminaries previously focused on Scriptural exegesis and proclamation are now focusing on teaching their future pastors’ postmodern concepts such as critical race theory and intersectionality. Churches throughout the nation are pushing progressive agendas along with the teaching of unconscious bias training and the deceptive idea of ‘white privilege.'”
The statement says faithful church members “are being encouraged to reject constitutional conservatives and to embrace open borders, reject normative patriotism, and embrace progressive concepts and social justice policies normally reserved for radical socialists or open society adherents.”
You can read the full text of the statement here.
N., an exceptionally well-informed lay Catholic, tells me that there are two basic tribes of gay bishops and priests.
The first tribe is the Progressives — some sexually active, others not — who believe homosexuality should be normalized by the Catholic Church, and are pushing openly for the Church to change its teachings to reflect that.
The second tribe are Conservatives who live a double life. Outwardly they advocate for traditional Catholic teaching on homosexuality, but they also live homosocially (in the sense of socializing with other gay conservative priests), and some have gay sex. They therefore live in a state of cognitive dissonance.
N. discussed particular examples of both kind of bishop and priest.
I asked N. why the gay Catholic progressive priests don’t simply out the hypocritical conservatives. Why not destroy your opposition, especially given that they really are hypocrites?
“Neither side wants to do that to the other. That would mean Armageddon,” he said. “Both sides live in a Cold War situation. They take potshots at each other, and fight proxy wars, but neither side wants to challenge the other too hard. If they really went to war, there would be nothing left for anybody.”
What N. meant is that the problem is so deeply embedded within the Catholic clerical structure that if the truth were known, the system as we know it would likely collapse, and neither gay nor conservative gay priests would have any privileges left to enjoy. So they tolerate each other.
In any event, while I appreciated the author's insights on unscrupulous gun dealers, I always question the need for special advice for women shooters versus male shooters when it comes to selecting a handgun. I understand it makes for good marketing, but is it really necessary? If you are approached by a new shooter for advice on buying a firearm, does it really matter--should it even matter--if that person is a man or woman? You still will need to find a gun that the person could carry, maintain and, if necessary, shoot accurately, which will depend to a large extent on the size of hands, recoil sensitivity, and life style/personality. The person's budget and certain medical issues, such as arthritis, may also need to be considered. You will need to know whether the person will put a lot of training or practice into the weapon, or purchase it, maybe shoot a few times to get the hang of it, and then dump it into a drawer or other container until such time as he or she might need it. You will need to know how that person intends to carry the weapon, if it is being purchased for that purpose. The problem is that a new shooter might not provide much of this information, nor can you necessarily intuit the information you need.
The real difference between men and women is not so much the firearm, but the method of carry and advice that should be given on a holster or concealment system. In addition to the options available to men, women can carry the weapon in a purse, a thigh holster, or even a flash-bang holster if they really want to be daring. Women are, obviously, shaped differently, and, therefore, women's clothing is cut differently which brings its own complications to determining a good concealed carry method and holster. A few good articles on this topic is "ABOUT CONCEALED CARRY HOLSTERS FOR WOMEN" at The Well Armed Woman, and "WHICH HOLSTER IS THE RIGHT ONE FOR A WOMAN?" at the Daily Caller (I believe both articles are by the same author), and "Concealed Carry Holsters For Women: What To Know Before You Buy" at Down Range Daily. Also check out "WOMEN & SHOOTING, PART 3: HOLSTER SELECTION" at Personal Defense Network.
In 2012, Romney might have won the election. In 2012, Toobin stoked Democrat fears that Kavanaugh, a conservative, might get on the Supreme Court and overturn Obamacare. And in 2012, Ford, a psychotherapist who undoubtedly had years of prior therapy herself, suddenly can’t stop talking about her hitherto undisclosed claim that Kavanaugh was a bad boy almost 30 years before.
Americans are increasingly unfamiliar with their neighbors. In 2010, Pew found that only 46 percent of its respondents talked face-to-face with neighbors about community issues. Presumably a significant portion of those not talking to neighbors about community issues are also not talking to neighbors about anything else. Additional results from that survey support that conclusion: even fewer people discussed community issues over the telephone or via email, social media, or texting. Keep in mind that “community issues” is like the weather—it’s one of the safest conversation topics available.
Many sociologists have argued that increasing anonymity in American society is tied to decreasing trust. According to one recent survey, only three in 10 Americans trust others. That same anonymity is also likely responsible for increased rates of loneliness. Despite heightened digital connectivity via social media, loneliness rates have doubled since the 1980s, from 20 percent to 40 percent. I’d be willing to bet a lot of those lonely people are the ones who don’t have any relationship with those living in their neighborhoods (or anywhere else, for that matter!).
(Underline added). And what is responsible for decreasing trust? Ethnic diversity.
Encouraging immigration from apparently inimical foreign cultures will ultimately make us better people. It will solve the disgusting problem of white privilege. We will interbreed and cross-pollinate and abandon our unhelpful nationalistic identities which have led to so much chauvinism and war in the past. Sure there might be the odd blip, but because this New World Order is so self-evidently desirable, no sacrifices are too great in order to achieve it.
(H/t Anonymous Conservative).
It wasn’t the pedophile priests that did in my faith. It was the bishops who protected them. That is, the men who ran the system were so morally and spiritually corrupt that in most cases they went out of their way to protect pedophile priests at the expense of children and their families. A priest friend back in 2002 told me that it was impossible to understand the sexual abuse scandal apart from a more general crisis in the Catholic Church. For example (he said), bishops protected these pedophile priests in part because they had lost a sense that the Church is supposed to be about something greater than serving the perceived interests of its ruling class (the clergy). The failure to react like any normal human being would to a sin as horrific as child molestation was in part a manifestation of a loss of sense of sin, period. Bishops had come to see themselves primarily as managers of an institution — an institution whose chief goal was its own perpetuation.
The abuse itself is terrible, of course. We should say that out loud, because while the details are unspeakable they must be spoken of. Without the release of the Pennsylvania grand jury report, we would know much less about the evil inside the church. (It is also instructive to note that authorities within the church opposed the release of this report.) But individual priest-abusers aren’t catastrophic to the church in any structural way. Predators will always be among us. It is a human pathology from which not even priests are immune. But the remedy for predation is straightforward: Whenever and wherever such men are discovered, they should be rooted out and punished.
The institutional damage is done not by the abusers but by the structures that cover for them, excuse them, and advance them. Viewed in that way, the damage done to the Catholic church by Cardinal Wuerl—and every other bishop who knew about McCarrick and stayed silent—is several orders of magnitude greater than that done by McCarrick himself.
He goes on to explain that there are no mechanisms in the church for dealing with errant bishops or cardinals, who are independent of one another, except through the Pope. "And the structure of the church has no remedy when a pope is foolish or wicked." Which is Pope Francis--foolish or wicked--is open to question, according to the author, but he makes two important points. First, Pope Francis's ascension to the Papacy was the result of political mechanizations, which have produced a Pope that is busily engaged in tearing down orthodox positions and reposition the church on issues such as divorce, abortion, and, most ominously, homosexuality. Second, the Pope and his advisors are incredibly tone-deaf about the current crises. The author observes that American cardinal is Blase Cupich said, in reaction to the current scandal, that “the pope has a bigger agenda. . . . he’s got to get on with other things” such as “talking about the environment and protecting migrants.” Read the whole thing.
Regardless of what you believe about handgun stopping power theories, bullet caliber/size/weight, velocity or any of the other related topics, the one thing most everyone agrees on is that shots to vital body parts is the best way to stop and fight and the more rounds delivered, the more likely this is to occur. This is why I spent a sizeable amount of time in my classes on shot placement and recoil control before moving on to tactics and techniques like movement, one hand manipulation, cover, etc. Stopping the threat before it can do you harm might be the ultimate tactic! It will require solid shot placement…
In order to accomplish this essential skill, I spend a great deal of time shooting 3 x 5 cards in my classes. A 3 x 5 card is about the same size as the heart and aorta and is likely the best focus region for handgun incapacitation as it is centered in the high chest. I like to use a series of paste overs in my courses that emphasize the vital parts of the body along with 3 x 5 cards to get my students to “zero in” on the vital zones. ...
... I am a big proponent of what Todd Green calls “negative taping” in which only misses are taped. By doing so, less time is spent taping and more time is spent shooting.
First chronograph at least five rounds of your load, and average the velocities. Next, use this average velocity, along with your bullet’s ballistic coefficient (BC), to develop a trajectory table for your load using your ballistics software of choice. Some programs include BCs for many bullets. Other programs may require you to enter a BC value, which can be obtained from the manufacturer’s website or catalog.
Sellers, predominantly based in China, are buying the data in a bid to gain an edge over competitors and boost sales on the online store, according to a new report.
Amazon confirmed it was investigating these new allegations, which also accused employees of offering to delete negative reviews and restore banned accounts for cash.
Fake customer reviews written by the merchants themselves were also among the probe's chief concerns, the company said.
(Underline added).
However, the twentieth century saw the focus of feminism turn from fighting for women to fighting against family. With the emersion of radical feminism, feminist theory blamed marriage and family life for creating sex roles that perpetuate the oppression of women. Consider these quotes from early twentieth century feminists: the family is “simply an institution for the more complete subjugation and enslavement of women and children;” marriage is “an institution which robs a woman of her individuality and reduces her to that of a prostitute;” motherhood “is a calamity to be avoided” at all costs; and “The family goes back to the age of savagery while the state belongs to the age of civilization.”
Their thinking was, and is, that men have an unfair biological advantage in the workplace. Therefore, in order for women to rise to their highest potential, they need to be free to have sex without the consequence of childbearing, and free to engage in the workplace without the burden of family. This is a decidedly male-centric worldview. How exactly does it advance the place of women and womanhood, who still overwhelmingly value marriage and motherhood, if, in order to find equality in society, they must refashion themselves in the image of non-childbearing men?
Well, there are other lies that have been taught to women as well. One of those being that women are somehow owed a "good man" simply by virtue of being a woman. Dalrock has addressed the problem of this attitude in many posts, but raises it most recently in a post entitled "It turns out they *both* want a tall man." The subject of the post is a short YouTube video ostensibly made by two women who travel to a different town to try and meet Mr. Right. They were unsuccessful. But as Dalrock notes, "[n]either of the two women give any indication in the nine and a half minute video that they understand they aren’t the only ones choosing, that they are being silently rejected by men just as they are silently ruling nearly all men out."
When we evaluate the teachings of God’s servants against our ideological worldview (whether it be liberalism, libertarianism, conservatism, or any other perspective), we risk elevating our own ideas over God Himself. In other words, the problem is not libertarianism, liberalism, conservatism, or any other belief system. The problem was with –isms entirely, when those –isms lead us to prioritize abstract ideas over ongoing revelation.
Where the author falls down, in my opinion, is applying this to the Church's recent statement issued in opposition to Proposition 2, which aims to legalize the use of medical marijuana in Utah. And the failure is because the Church's opposition rests, not on inspiration or revelation, but on a legal opinion that appears to be written by a first or second year associate attorney. The author apparently recognizes this weakness in his argument, because he explains:
If the First Presidency’s reservations about Proposition 2 are inspired, I wouldn’t expect them to come with reasons attached. So it stands to reason that the Church must turn to knowledgeable third parties to supply those reasons, if it is to supply any reason at all. The arguments supplied by these third parties (Kirton McConkie, in this case) could be quite flawed, or even spectacularly wrong — and yet the reservations of the Church could still be divinely inspired. Even if I disagree with some of the arguments made by Kirton McConkie, it doesn’t change my opinion that the Church’s warning should be heeded.
As I pointed out in an earlier post, there are numerous flaws with the Kirton McConkie firm's legal memorandum. But, more tellingly to me, is that there is nothing in the Church's official statement that even suggests that the leaders relied on revelation or inspiration. Rather, the statement ends by suggesting that members read the memorandum and "make their own judgment." Well, I did as the Church instructed, and made my own judgment.
According to him, about ten percent of the Brazilians that hire his services are caught by the police. For these cases he's got a network of lawyers who try to release the person through bail while the judicial process runs its course. "Even if the person is deported in the end, there's enough time till the final decision for he or she to amass a good amount of money."
- Related: "Mexican national pleads guilty to illegal voting in Harris County"--Houston Chronicle.
- Related: And from Florida: "‘This is Hialeah!’ Taco Bell employee refuses to help client [sic] who doesn’t speak Spanish"--Miami Herald.
When dealing with a fixed—often low—capacity magazine, a good rule to follow is: Load what you shoot. In practice this means topping off the magazine as part of your post-shooting sequence. Whether hunting or fighting, it’s a good idea to get the gun back to full capacity, as you need to be prepared for whatever may happen next.
The author also describes 4 simple drills for practicing shooting and loading on the go.
One thing that can reduce cognitive load when dealing with multiple required tasks, is to improve your single task performance. Brown and Bennett (2002)pointed out that ‘practice on a task leads to a shift in cognitive processing such that the task uses fewer attentional resources as various components of performance… become automatized.’ (p. 86)
Wound channels were deep and wide for a .380. The permanent wounds began at about 2” in the gel and displayed a cavity about 5” long and about .5-.6” wide. Combined with the great-for-caliber penetration, the load was capable of delivering excellent wounding results.
Penetration averaged 13 inches, even through heavy clothing.
Human history and prehistory is crammed with all kind of mayhem and trauma: infant mortality, infanticide, genocidal fights with neighboring tribes. You routinely lost family and routinely killed enemies. Childbirth hurts a lot. What’s the adaptive strategy, in all of these situations? ? Get over it.
Moreover, according to the author, there isn't any real documentation of soldiers in the ancient world--or even into the 19th Century for that matter--suffering from PTSD. This all changed beginning with WWI, the first war where exploding ordinance first played a major role. The author continues:
I would guess that what actually happened was a combination of people finding a way to avoid getting killed, and brain damage due to nearby explosions. After experience in Iraq and Afghanistan, plus football and boxing, people are thinking seriously about those explosions as a cause of PTSD.
... The fact that this amendment did not authorize birthright citizenship as it exists today is demonstrated further by the fact that Native Americans did not gain U.S. citizenship en masse when this amendment passed, in 1868, but 56 years later, with an act of Congress.
Regardless of whether we should have birthright citizenship today or not, it is clear that the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment did not intend individuals not subject to the full and complete jurisdiction of the United States to be included as citizens. It is hard to believe that they would have accepted our modern conception of “birthright citizenship,” in which any person, regardless of whether they are in the country legally, and regardless of their parents’ citizenship, can claim U.S. citizenship.
It is clear that individuals within the territory of the United States, under a tourist or student visa, or who have crossed the border illegally, are not under the full and complete jurisdiction of the United States, but are still under the jurisdiction, at least in part, of a foreign nation.
An analysis of the data by the Center for Immigration Studies said that there are 44.5 million legal and illegal immigrants in the country, the highest ever in U.S. history, with the most from Latin America.
Also:
“American continues to experience the largest wave of mass immigration in our history. The decline in Mexican immigrants has been entirely offset by immigration from the rest of the world. By 2027, the immigrant share will hit its highest level in U.S. history, and continue to rise,” said Steven Camarota, the Center's director of research and co-author of the report.
Klein goes on to recount various small-scale academic studies that found that when researchers point out to white people how fast they are being demographically overwhelmed, they worry about it. Whites who are made aware by researchers of just how precarious their children’s long-term political position will be are likely to favor more conservative policies. It’s almost as if citizens assume that the point of the United States is, as the Preamble to the Constitution states, to benefit “ourselves and our posterity.”
So here, then, is what we know: Even gentle, unconscious exposure to reminders that America is diversifying—and particularly to the idea that America is becoming a majority-minority nation—pushes whites toward more conservative policy opinions and more support of the Republican Party.
In other words, white people become a problem for Democrats when they are made aware of the fate Democrats are plotting for them and theirs.
- Close Range Urban Confrontations
- Facing Multiple Advancing Attackers
- Rapidly Evolving Situations Precluding traditional Marksmanship
- Limited Down Range Effect of Missed Shots
- Reduced Visibility Due To Atmospheric or Man Made Effects (smoke, fires, gas)
- Limited Penetration Through Mediums, Living or Static
- Increased Physical Damage from Hits
- Ability To Hit Massed targets With One Projectile
One of these indoor greenhouses — or automated growing systems, as they’re referred to — was created by six engineering students at Rice University. Aside from planting the seeds, the greenhouse does pretty much everything. It’s about the size of a small bookshelf and operates anywhere indoors.
“We didn’t want it to take up too much space in an apartment,” said Harrison Lin, a student who worked on the project. He said they wanted to “make it not intrusive, but it could still grow a useful amount of plants.”
There are push buttons on the device to designate how much light and water the plants get, and to determine the temperature inside it. If you’re feeling extremely hands-off, there are three pre-set options: leafy greens, roots and herbs. Select what you’re growing and go about your business.
– How do I conceal my gun when working my way to the shooter? If you don’t conceal it, you may be mistaken for the shooter by a cop or another CCW permit holder. It’s difficult balancing the competing needs of staying low profile, yet ready at the same time. In the Arizona shooting, one of the men who responded was armed. When he heard the shots being fired, he unholstered his 9mm pistol, and put it in his pocket (with his hand still on it) as he made his way to confront the shooter. That was a very smart move. He had instant access to the gun, but no one else saw it.
Put simply, there is no such thing as full-contact training. Training always involves a level of simulation — even that which we call “full contact.” You may have used the phrase before; I know I have. But if we look at the letter of the meaning of the term, it is impossible. A truly full-contact sparring session isn’t sparring at all; it’s fighting another person with the intent to do them serious harm. The only full-contact fight simulation that actually fully replicates full contact is… well, getting into a fight with someone.
Recognizing this, students of combatives — of reality-based self-defense, and of expedient, realistic self-defense methods — have long relied on Body Opponent Bags, or B.O.B.s. The term has come to be a catch-all for any torso-shaped punching apparatus. The idea is that you can better target your techniques on a freestanding torso dummy than you can a heavy bag. Both allow you to hit as hard as you are able without injuring yourself, yet the BOB lets you better visualize your attacks and their effects.
While it is true that it isn't completely realistic--the bag can't hit back--it does allow you to practice full power strikes. And training full power strikes against a living partner is also unrealistic--it simply can't be done without an unacceptable level of risk, as the author discusses.
Although the article discusses striking, I would note that even ground fighting requires you to hold back. I remember training some maneuver that ended up with the guy on top being thrown to one side and his arm being placed in a lock. It was my first time learning the technique, but I was partnered up with someone who was already experienced with it. We started ... and suddenly I was on my back and my arm was in the lock and the suddenness so surprised me that I was a bit slow to tap out. Fortunately, nothing was broken, but I sure let out a yell!
The Finns proved singularly adept at leveraging their homeland’s harsh environmental conditions and geography in the course of their struggle for national survival. Finnish troops were nearly all highly experienced skiers and possessed a degree of mobility Soviet soldiers could not match. Silently gliding out of pine forests, bedecked in snow capes often haphazardly assembled from bed linens, Finnish ski troopers continuously surprised, circumvented, and harassed their beleaguered opponents. Despite the earlier warnings of a few isolated voices within the Soviet Commissariat of Defense, the Russian and Ukrainian soldiers catapulted by their thousands into the frozen taiga had received little to no arctic training. Few could effectively use snow shoes, let alone ski. Easily detectable in their khaki uniforms, countless Soviet troops vanished into the frozen wilderness, never to be seen again. When reading about the truly astonishing levels of attrition at the hands of ski troopers, one is reminded of the maneuverability “overmatch” Mongol horse archers enjoyed over their foes for much of the 13th century.
Perhaps some of the most useful insights into this unique way of war can be gleaned by perusing the writings of Finnish veterans later recruited as winter warfare advisors for the U.S. Army. In their view, it was not sufficient to adapt to a harsh geography. Rather, the goal should to develop new forms of operational art that enable one to leverage that same geography against an ill-adapted foe. ... With much of the landscape blanketed under heavy layers of snow, ski troopers could afford to explore multiple axes of approach, whereas Soviet infantry and armored units were confined to narrow forest roads and logged tracks.
Read the whole thing. A couple other good articles are "Got Sisu? Essential Guerrilla Tactics from the Finnish Winter War" at The Art of Manliness, and "Finnish 'by the book' tactics in the Winter War."
This decline is made all the more perilous due to research, led by a Japanese psychologist called Kenya Kura, which has shown that Northeast Asians are genetically less intellectually creative than Europeans. [Why do Northeast Asians Win So Few Nobel Prizes?, By Kenya Kura et al., Comprehensive Psychology, 4: 2015] Northeast Asians, compared to Europeans, have higher gene frequencies of polymorphisms which make people collectivist, socially anxious, and fearful of anything novel. Kura and his team argue that this is adaptation to a particular ecology, where it is vital to stay in a tightly-bonded group.
However, they note that scientific innovators tend to combine very high IQ with an optimally low level of collectivism, low social anxiety and low fearfulness of the new. In other words, they have high “Openness-Intellect”, as psychologists term this trait. This psychological profile means that they can think outside the box and don’t care about the offence to vested interests which their new idea will almost certainly result in.
This is why, maintains Kura, it is the West that generated the Industrial Revolution, rather than more intelligent Northeast Asians. The West is indeed the Goldilocks Zone for genius.
'I decided if I was going to date again, then I might as well start looking for someone already well enough off that I could eliminate that stress,' she explained.
Ashley still works full-time, but she said the extra financial support allows her to do more for herself and her children.
The mom estimates that half of her income — including gifts and bills that have been paid for her — comes from being a sugar baby.
And, most damning, in my opinion:
Ashley hopes that being a sugar baby will help her find Mr. Right, but if it doesn't, it isn't something she plans on doing forever.
'I will only do it till I'm able to go back to school and find a job that will pay enough to make it in this world by myself with my kids,' she explained.
In other words, she is just stringing the guy along for as long as he is willing to support her. This is one of the reasons that the number one cardinal rule of dating is to never date a single mother.
Not my usual fare, but interesting nonetheless. The forum is called Dread and it is apparently the dark web's version of Reddit. Anyway,...