The argument is that the refugees and migrants are used as a back channel method to funnel money (via remittances) back to intelligence and/or military assets in foreign countries.
VIDEO: "Why The West Will NEVER Be Allowed To Stop Mass Immigration | Mike Benz"
Winston Marshall Clips (12 min.)
The New York Post reports: "Socialist congressional candidate Melat Kiros defeats longtime Rep. Diana DeGette in Colorado primary in another blow to establishment Dems." The article mentions that Kiros was born in Ethiopia and was backed by socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders. She is, of course, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America.
John Wilder's latest is "Birthright Citizenship, The Economics Of Infinity, And The Inevitability Of War." He is, of course, talking about the consequences of the June 30 decision of the four women on the Supreme Court (he counts Roberts as a woman) of ruling that any kid popped out by an illegal or vacationer on U.S. soil becomes a citizen. Or as Wilder phrased it:
If an illegal steps one foot into Arizona and squats a tot, the squatted tot is just as American as Neil Armstrong. If a woman on a legal visa drops a moppet, even if she overstays? It’s an American citizen, just as American as Mark Twain.
The American people, therefore, have no say in who becomes an American.
So why can't the U.S. have an effective border. It all comes down to the interests of those that actually call the shots:
Why they’ve been allowed is simple.
For the GloboLeftElite, they represent a new voter bloc that’s skewed to vote against nationalism and for communism.
For the Institutional Elite, they represent more demand for their services and more job for their gay friends.
For the “Idaho Rancher” they represent a way to get cheap labor and avoid paying the prices it would take for Americans to do the work, and the “Idaho Rancher” doesn’t have to pay for the services like medical and child care and prisons.
For the “Wall Street Firm” it’s a way to get cheap labor that will never say no, and will never report you for doing something shady.
These groups are all traitors.
He goes on to discuss the consequences, including why it will lead to civil war, so read the whole thing.
Over at the Anonymous Conservative, some thoughts as to whether Barrett's vote was bought through a book deal arranged by anti-Trumpers.
Meanwhile, the issue is being resolved in South Africa, where anti-immigration groups had given illegals until yesterday, June 30, to leave the country. The government has deployed police to protect the illegals while President Cyril Ramaphosa calls any calls to violence vigilantism. But this doesn't appear to be a fringe issue:
Reporting from a protest in Johannesburg, Al Jazeera correspondent Haru Mutasa said the demonstrators were both working-class and middle-class South Africans and from different tribes around the country.
“They all have one goal, which is basically that they want the government to do something about undocumented foreigners in the country,” she said. “They’re saying that they’re frustrated, that they’ve heard promises from the government but they’re not seeing any difference on the ground.
VIDEO: "Forced to flee South Africa as anti-immigrant deadline approaches"
Channel 4 News (10 min.)
The Daily Mail reports that "Supergirl braces for a $100million loss: Milly Alcock's movie misfire marks a major setback for the rebooted DC Universe as it bombs at the box office." The article states that the film cost $170 million to produce with $120 million in marketing costs, but then states that "[t]he film would need to earn $300million - $375million to break even[.]" I do not believe this is correct because it doesn't consider the split between studios and theaters, which is typically around 50/50. If the production and marketing costs totaled $290 million, the film would need to earn around twice that--$580 million--for the studio to break even.
Interestingly, despite the studio spin that it was misogynist haters that killed interest in the film, it was women who avoided the film. Metro News pointed out:
You need only look at the demographic for this weekend’s audience, as reported by Deadline – 59% of the audience was male, and 65% was over the age of 25 – which shows that young women, surely the target audience of this particular entry, simply didn’t show up.
The Critical Drinker offers his own thoughts on why the film didn't succeed in the video, below. I haven't watched it, but my sons--who are big superhero film fans--all went to see it this past weekend. And the best they had to offer was that it was "okay". Even my son who is consistently the biggest defender of the actors and directors of these films wasn't that impressed.
VIDEO: "Supergirl - The Most Predictable Of Disasters"
The Critical Drinker (12 min.)
The argument is that the refugees and migrants are used as a back channel method to funnel money (via remittances) back to intelligence and/...
