Some advice for better dry-fire practice with your handgun--particularly striker-fired or single-action semi-auto pistols.
VIDEO: "STOP RACKING THE SLIDE: A BETTER WAY TO DRY FIRE YOUR HANDGUN"
ConcealedCarry dot com (15 min.)
Exploring practical methods for preparing for the end times, including analysis of end time scripture and prophecy, current events, prepping and self-defense.
Some advice for better dry-fire practice with your handgun--particularly striker-fired or single-action semi-auto pistols.
VIDEO: "STOP RACKING THE SLIDE: A BETTER WAY TO DRY FIRE YOUR HANDGUN"
ConcealedCarry dot com (15 min.)
While modern gunfighting techniques emphasize two-handed shooting with a fairly tight grip on the weapon, in the past both shooting techniques and the designs of the firearms were based around a revolver being a hand (singular) gun. Here the author demonstrates shooting both regular and heavy loads out of a single-action revolver with the traditional plow handle grips, and how to mitigate the recoil by allowing the revolver to roll upward (which also helps with a fast cocking of the gun for the next shot) and/or allowing the whole arm to rise to deal with particularly heavy recoil. Not only does it mitigate recoil making it more comfortable to shoot the weapon, but the author's tests showed that he was more accurate than with a tight grip (what he calls the "death grip") on the weapon.
I don't have a big bore single action revolver, so I probably would not be able to use this technique with any of my handguns. But those of you that have old-West style single action revolvers might be able to make use of this.
VIDEO: "Recoil Management With Heavy Six Gun Loads"
The Shooters Apprentice (16 min.)
As gun owners, we are aware of the propensity of the political class to pass unnecessary gun laws to combat "gun violence" even though there are already laws on the books that could be used if only they were enforced. Of course, the new laws are not really intended to combat crime, but to further restrict the rights of lawful gun owners.
Well, the same may soon occur to laws regarding protests. Wired reports that "The Manhattan Institute Helped Kill DEI. Now It’s Coming for Protests." The article explains:
“Today’s left-wing agitators deploy random acts of lawlessness designed to inconvenience and disrupt as many civilians as possible, hoping to pressure them to get the government to change course. This tactic is reasonably described as a form of terrorism, though the activists aren’t murderous like al-Qaida or Hamas—they don’t use guns, bombs, or threats of unpredictable bloodshed. Instead, they engage in civil terrorism,” wrote Manhattan Institute legal policy fellow Tal Fortgang, a recent New York University law graduate who lambasted students protesting against Israel’s war on Gaza for “Jew hatred.”
Fortgang, who’s spent his career at right-wing think tanks, appears to be the main proponent of the “civil terrorism” theory, beginning with a February 2025 Wall Street Journal op-ed that argued acts of nonviolent disobedience like blocking a road was something far more sinister. More recently, he authored a piece in City Journal, the Manhattan Institute’s in-house magazine, targeting the Answer anti-war protest network’s “central role in organizing an act of civil terrorism and its advocacy on behalf of Venezuela, Iran, and China [which] are reason enough to believe that its actions may be unlawful under statutes like FARA,” the Foreign Agents Registration Act.
In response to WIRED’s questions, Fortgang claims that he focuses on anti-war, pro-Palestinian, and Black Lives Matter activists in his writings justifying the novel “civil terrorism” theory “because they constitute the overwhelming majority of groups engaged in this behavior.” Asked why states should step up protest-related crimes from misdemeanors to felonies, he wrote: “When hundreds of people gather to commit disorderly conduct together, we are dealing with something completely different. That is what I call civil terrorism: mass commission of minor crimes to intimidate or coerce a population into adopting certain policies.”
Utah has already passed legislation similar to what Fortgang wants to see adopted across the country, while Arizona's legislature is apparently considering it as well.
I have three issues with this:
Some more "just for fun" posting: Big Country Expat has a humorous account of working in a call center with substandard air conditioning, which was tolerable under a relaxed dress code. But then a new dress code was enforced ... leaving our resourceful hero no choice but to force the company to live up to its own rules. Check it out: "Chinese Curse: 'May You Live In Interesting Times'." The story is near the bottom of the post, after his account of some recent "interesting times" events in his life.
VIDEO: "Calvin and Hobbes Dance"
prettylittlesomeday (30 sec.)
From JP's summary:
We cover a variety of crazy news stories in this episode, most notably: Congress has moved to integrate the US military with Israel. And Don Jr marries daughter of Epstein’s personal banker. That’s right ladies and gentleman, the son of the biggest Epstein criminal protector has married the daughter of Epstein’s personal banker. We have all the details in this episode.
VIDEO: "It Doesn't Get Any Crazier Than This! - News Update"
AwakenWithJP (12 min.)
Now that many in the self-defense and prepping community are packing around IFAKs to deal with serious trauma, a reminder that not every injury needs a tourniquet, pressure bandage, or a 5-foot roll of gauze. The author reviews a few pre-made kits of lessor items--"boo boo" kits--packaged and sealed that you can slip into an IFAK, a backpack, or into a pocket.
VIDEO: "The Medical Layer Most IFAKs Are Missing: Field Austere Medical"
PreparedAirman (6 min.)
From the Daily Mail: "Why Israel is quietly emerging as the biggest winner from the Iran war." The key point from the article is that Israel's war aims are different from ours:
Unlike the US, which sought the nebulous goal of regime change, or Iran, whose sole aim was simply to survive, Israel's calculated involvement has delivered tangible and perhaps lasting geopolitical gains.
'Israel's goal was always to inflict maximum destruction on Iran, its proxy groups and its ability to rebuild after the war,' Pleasance explained.
'Their strategy was therefore to fight as intensely as possible, for as long as possible.'
This war aim, Pleasance said, put Israel at odds with its closest ally. While Trump had promised the American people a swift end to the conflict, Netanyahu needed the fighting to keep going.
Yet despite the war entering its fourth month, Israel has managed to maintain its crucial alliance with Washington.
In that time, according to US military figures, Iran has been crippled, with the majority of its air defences, navy and missile factories reportedly destroyed alongside every one of its drone production facilities.
While the US has borne the brunt of the diplomatic pressure and footed much of the bill, Israel has been quietly eliminating many of its most dangerous enemies.
And this explains why Israel keeps sabotaging attempts to resolve the conflict.
An interesting piece from Rod Martin (h/t Instapundit) which asks "Is Scott Bessent Working to Crash the Yuan?" Bessent is the current Treasury Secretary. But back in the day, Martin relates, Bessent was part of the team at Soros Fund Management that “broke the Bank of England.” So he knows how to crash a country's currency. Martin hypothesizes that Trump wanted Bessent to head up the Treasury Department because of his experience in exploiting weaknesses in currencies, and wanted to apply that against China.
Martin explains:
Speculators do not destroy sound currencies by magic. They attack when governments defend lies. They see the contradiction before politicians admit it, before central bankers explain it away, before the press corps discovers it three years too late and pretends it was obvious all along. Britain broke. The pound fell. The Bank of England lost.
[snip]
China is not Britain in 1992. The analogy is not exact, nor does it need to be. Britain was defending a currency arrangement markets no longer believed. China is defending something far bigger: the fiction that an overbuilt, overleveraged, export-addicted dictatorship with too little domestic consumption and evaporating foreign direct investment can keep growing forever while its own people are trapped behind financial walls and its customers are shutting their doors.
That fiction is embodied, crystallized in the yuan.
The yuan is not a normal currency. It is not the dollar. It’s not even the euro. It is a managed instrument of Communist Party control. A real reserve currency requires trust. It requires convertibility. It requires deep and open capital markets. It requires the rule of law. It requires confidence that the government will not trap your savings the moment they become politically inconvenient.
As Martin continues, Trumps tariffs go the heart of the matter because it forces China to defend one of its lies at the expense of revealing the contradiction on other points.
Trump isn’t just raising costs. He is forcing choices. He’s making China decide which lie it wants to defend first: the lie that its export machine can survive without unrestricted access to the American consumer, the lie that its domestic economy is healthy, the lie that the yuan is trusted, or the lie that Communist capital controls are compatible with global financial leadership.
Another bunch of racists are complaining about having to interact with white people. From the New York Post: "San Francisco ‘adult supremacy’ workshop brands teachers as oppressors — as fringe trend spreads in California schools." The article explains:
A San Francisco public school reportedly hosted a workshop on “adult supremacy” — a new woke trend labeling teachers and adults “oppressors” that’s quietly gaining traction in California.
The confab, held at John O’Connell High School during an “Ethnic Studies Everywhere” weekend seminar in April, was titled “Youth as Knowledge Producers: Challenging Adult Supremacy Through Ethnic Studies,” according to an attendee who spoke with The Post.
“Due to systemic power dynamics inherently the relationship between students and educators is an oppressive one. Oppressor (educator) & oppressed (student),” a presentation slide explained.
The workshop was led by Jennifer Sanchez, a third-year ethnic studies educator in the Central Valley, and convened by Teachers 4 Social Justice, a nonprofit that aims to create “empowering learning environments, more equitable access to resources and power, and realizing a just and caring culture,” according to its website.
Teachers 4 Social Justice was founded by local teacher activist Jeremiah Jeffries, who led an unpopular push to rename public schools during the pandemic that was abandoned after sparking outrage from local parents.
Translating the aims of Teachers 4 Social Justice, it is using the race card to insist that white teachers be replaced with black or Hispanic teachers. This is another example of what Peter Turchin termed "elite overproduction." You might not think of teachers are being part of the elites, but they fit into the lower echelons of the elites due to their government jobs and benefits. They will certainly enter retirement much more comfortable than the majority of people due to generous public pensions--particularly in wealthy states. This is just an example of a type of competition for these public jobs. And, according to Turchin, "elite overproduction" is a key factor in producing revolution or civil war.
Anonymous Conservative mentioned this in today's news brief . " Israeli producer had access to data harvested by Poland using Pega...