Nowak, as you may remember, was a British youth stabbed repeatedly by a non-British thug, Vickrum Digwa, then handcuffed and left to drown in his own blood by the British police. Spiked has more about this case and the cause of Nowak's death in its article: "Henry Nowak and the savagery of state wokeness." Digwa has been found guilty of murder; his mother, who removed the murder weapon from the scene and hid it, has been found guilty of "assisting an offender."
As savage as the knifing was, it was what happened next that has shaken Britain’s soul. Digwa’s mother arrived and spirited away the murder weapon – it was later found hidden in the family home with 20 other Sikh swords and knives. Digwa then accused Nowak of having racially abused him. He said Nowak used a racist slur against him, punched him and knocked off his turban. These were ‘wicked lies’, the court heard during his murder trial. Yet there was a group of people on the scene of this atrocity who believed Digwa’s vile libels against the youth he had just fatally lacerated: the police.
The author goes on to explain why the police believed Digwa and let Nowak die.
We all know why Digwa’s evil lie was believed and why wounded, gasping Henry’s pleas for help went unheeded – it’s because the word ‘racism’ acts like a magic spell on our ruling class. It’s like a rhetorical narcotic. The minute they hear it, they morph, like woke Manchurian candidates, into wide-eyed searchers for the merest hint of that greatest sin in our morally deracinated times: white privilege, and prejudicial speech. Their aim becomes not the discovery of truth but the demonstration of virtue. On that street in Southampton, once the word ‘racism’ had been uttered, the role of the state’s representatives suddenly and radically changed: it was no longer to investigate a potential crime but to obsequiously act out a moral script.
Having prostrated themselves so fully before the new regime religion that falsely calls itself ‘anti-racism’, the police were virtually programmed to believe the ‘brown man’ and be sceptical of the ‘white man’. No doubt the critical race theory that pumps like a toxin in the veins of the establishment kicked in, meaning that the Sikh who had so ruthlessly wielded his sword instantly became the victim, while the target of his red-mist knifing – the white boy – became the oppressor. The state’s intoxication with the hyper-racialised politics of victimhood has driven it ever further into a quagmire of dogma where cool moral judgment is all but impossible.
Read the whole thing.
Mean girl boss poleece. Keep calm and waive the rules the sun has set.
ReplyDeleteA system is what it does.
ReplyDeleteThe British Isles are being overrun with the diaspora of the Third World not out of guilt over "racism," but because the British ruling class are globalists who have betrayed their own nation, people and heritage. The hordes of young military age male Muslims are not there to assimilate to British ways; they are there de facto as an occupation army. And now Starmer's government is importing very large numbers of Indians, too, many of whom also despise Britain despite being non-Muslim.
ReplyDeleteHenry Nowak's needless death has proven beyond all doubt that native Britons are now second-class citizens in the country their forebearers built. "Immigrants," on the other hand, it seems can do anything they want to do...
In this case, the assailant and his mother were charged fully according to British law, because the light of publicity is on this case, but make no mistake, as soon as the furor dies down, the authorities will go back to looking the other way while "migrants" run amok in the UK.