Wednesday, December 28, 2022

POTD: Abandoned Marina on Elk River, Maryland

 

(Source)

Meme of the Day: The Refugee And The Hen House

 

Source: Bayou Renaissance Man

Funny enough, Peter Grant at Bayou Renaissance Man gives us the story to go with this meme as well. Grant has a post, "Re-learning a hard lesson on safety and security from Buffalo, NY," about the looting that has occurred in Buffalo, New York, under the cover of the recent winter storm/blizzard. The video and photographs I've seen of actual looters suggests that most of this is being done by elements of the black population, but there also appear to be a few Hispanics. As Grant observes in his post:

    ... When law and order is deliberately downplayed, hamstrung, ignored . . . then the low-lifes come out to play.  Snow was a factor in Buffalo, but it's far from the only one.  Heat, power outages, failure of the EBT benefit system, and a host of other factors might all, jointly or severally, provoke such an outbreak of crime.  Groups such as Black Lives Matter, or Antifa, or others might also deliberately orchestrate such events, to demonstrate that the city administration has to negotiate with them, or else.  (Personally, I think the "or else" option is greatly undervalued, and that salutary lessons need to be administered to such groups and their followers:  but not everyone sees it that way.)

    What's even worse is that the flood of illegal aliens crossing our borders almost unchecked is merely adding to the problem.  Most of them come from countries where this sort of thing is rampant.  Do your own research into criminal and gang activity in South America, where most of these illegal aliens come from.  They're bringing those attitudes across our borders, and I'm willing to bet they'll act on them as soon as they realize the welfare money is finite, and they (legally, at least) don't qualify for many of our generous entitlement programs.

VIDEO: Carry A Trauma Kit

 

Active Self Protection Extra (22 min.)

    John Correia gives his response to the video from the Armed Attorneys on why having a trauma kit could be used against you by an over-zealous prosecutor. Correia says hogwash and steps through the Armed Attorney video to address some of the points and to point out that your defense counsel and defense experts should easily be able to refute any accusations that having a trauma kit and using it (or not using it) can be used to show some sort of intent or ill will. He also holds up the example of Kyle Rittenhouse as someone hauling around a medical kit and it not being used against him (Correia indicates it was never even raised as an issue in the Rittenhouse case). 

    While I tend to agree that having a kit will probably not become an issue, Correia makes one comment that if vocalized to authorities could make it an issue. Correia makes a comparison between using hollowpoint bullets just like the local police and carrying a trauma kit because the local police carry them too. Using bullets just like the local PD is to avoid or overcome arguments from the prosecutor that you used extra deadly bullets, because then the prosecutor or a witness would have to acknowledge that the local PD is using "extra deadly" bullets. The trauma kit issue, I fear, would come across in a different manner: that you were trying to emulate the police. And if you remember, one of the accusations that George Zimmerman faced was that he was not just an innocent armed citizen that happened to be robbed, but was acting like he was a police officer and proactively engaged with Saint Skittles. 

    It's fine to look at the local PD to see how they are carrying kits or what they include in a kit, but you're not carrying a trauma kit because that is what police do and you are a wanna-be officer, but because you want something in case you or a loved one are bleeding out, whether from a gun shot wound, knife wound, auto accident, farm or machinery accident, bear or dog attack or whatever. 

Tuesday, December 27, 2022

VIDEO: "Don't Carry a Trauma Kit"

 

VIDEO: "Don't Carry a Trauma Kit"--The Armed Attorneys (11 min.)

They believe it is probably fine to carry one in a range bag (in the event of an accident at the shooting range, for instance) or in a vehicle (since it can be used to treat for injuries resulting from an auto accident), but not to carry one on your person. Essentially, they argue that having a trauma kit could be used against you by a "creative" prosecutor: e.g., using one to assist an attacker you just shot could be used as evidence of consciousness of guilt (i.e., you know you did something wrong and now you are trying to make it right); merely having one could be used as evidence that you intended or hoped to get into a confrontation; or if you have one but didn't use it on the wounded attacker, a prosecutor might try to use it as evidence that you wanted the person to die. I, myself, would wonder why someone would be willing to approach and render aid to someone that supposedly just a moment before had placed them in fear of imminent bodily harm or death.

POTD: Dead Mall

 

Source: "Abandoned States: The Dead Malls of Ohio And Pennsylvania"--dcist

Monday, December 26, 2022

The Docent's Memo (December 26, 2022)

 

 Ian says what a lot of other people are afraid to say: it doesn't matter if you are using .223 or 5.56 NATO. I've only ever seen one instance where it might have made a difference: a friend with an AR that was having problems with his AR popping primers out the back that were falling into his trigger mechanism and jamming it up. But those same rounds cycled flawlessly through the ".223" marked Mini-14 I had at the time, so who knows if the caliber was the issue?

Firearms & Self-Defense:

  • Be sure to check out the most recent Weekend Knowledge Dump from Greg Ellifritz at Active Response Training. He's also published a list of the best books he read over the past year in case you are looking for something new or different to read. 
  • "Ammunition Choices for 9mm Revolvers"--Active Response Training. If you have a 9mm revolver that you plan on concealed carry, Greg Ellifritz has some tips on ammo selection. The primary potential ammo issue with 9mm caliber revolvers--especially the light weight revolvers that you would be using for concealed carry--is "bullet jump": "This is a phenomenon where bullets start pulling free of their cases because of recoil and the fact that the bullet crimp is different than most revolver cartridges." As the bullets pull free, they can bind up the cylinder and keep it from turning. This issue can occur with revolvers when using other calibers, particularly magnum calibers like .357 or .44. I've experienced it myself a couple times while shooting .357 Magnum, once with handloads and another time with commercial ammunition. 
    Most revolver ammunition uses a roll crimp that presses the front edge of the case mouth into a cannelure (or the bullet if it is soft enough) to hold the bullet in place. Because 9mm headspaces off the front edge of the case mouth, a roll crimp won't work and a taper crimp is used instead. A taper crimp presses a wider area of the case up tight against the bullet to prevent movement. (See this Sierra article on crimping and this article by Mike Venturino for more information on crimping).

    Unfortunately, the amount and consistency of crimping can vary among manufacturers. While I was reading Ellifritz's article, however, I realized that the list of manufacturers and loadings recommended by Bond Arms for their Bullpup 9 pistol would also serve as a list of ammunition for the person shooting a light weight 9mm revolver. The Bullpup 9 pistol is a bullpup style pistol which has a unique method of loading a cartridge from the magazine into the chamber that can pull a bullet out of the case if there is an insufficient crimp; consequently Bond Arms has put together a list approved ammunition--both defensive and practice--to use in its handgun. I'm confident that if this ammo can avoid being pulled apart in the Bond Arm's pistol, it should be able to survive going through a revolver.

Zenk RZMK-357 is a double action 6-shot top break revolver chambered in .357 Magnum. It’s made of stainless steel and will be available in black and silver colors. The revolver has iron sights and a top 4-slot Picatinny rail section. The barrel length of the RZMK-357 revolver is 4.37″ (111mm), the height is 5.67″ (144mm), the overall length is 6.85″ (174mm) and it weighs 33oz (950 grams).

It apparently uses a tip-up action to load and unload the cylinder. The company is supposed to have models to show off at the 2023 Shot Show.  I think it looks interesting--a nice mix of retro and futuristic. 

  • And while we are on the topic of new pistol announcements, Savage has decided to take the plunge and is diving into the 1911 market offering models in both .45 ACP and 9mm, with MSRP ranging from $1350 to $1500 depending on finish and whether it sports an accessory rail. All will feature Novak lo-mount style tritium sights, an ambidextrous safety, VZ G10 grips, extended beaver tail, and duel recoil springs. There seems to be a great deal of disappointment in the comments that Savage is releasing a 1911 instead of a version of its 1907 pistol that almost beat the 1911 in the Army's pistol trials. 
  • "The Italian Cheetah: The Beretta 80-Series Pistols" by Mike Kupari, The Mag Life. A nice overview of the Beretta 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 87, 89, Browning BDA and FN 140DA pistols. The author's model is the Beretta 81 which was a .32 ACP model, so he also discusses a bit about his experience with his particular pistol and the .32 round. One of the modifications he made to his pistol was that he "replaced the scratched plastic grips with a checkered, blue G10 set from Lok Grips. Available in several colors, these grips are thinner than the factory ones and are much more vigorously textured." I have to say that the blue grips look very nice. The web site for Lok Grips is here.
  • "DeSantis Nemesis Pocket Holster Review"--Loose Rounds. The author goes over the pros and cons of this holster and his review after using it with a P365. His conclusion is positive if you are the person ready and able to pocket carry a handgun. 
    I would add that I have several of these for various small handguns, including one for my snub-nosed revolver that I've used for over a decade, and they have worked very well and, so far, I haven't had one wear out--that is, no issue with stitching coming undone or the material wearing through. In fact, that is why I continued buying them. They retain well  compared to other pocket holsters, even if the "tackiness" on the outside of the holster becomes a little muted over time. And by "retain" I don't mean holding the pistol but in that the holster doesn't go flying out of your pocket when you pull out the handgun. By the nature of things, the main retention of the handgun, itself, in a pocket holster is gravity and the fact that is is fully enclosed by your pocket. 
 
    My only issue with the holster--and this is common with every other pocket holster I've used--is that it doesn't do a very good job of concealing the shape of the weapon when the pocket is taut against the holster/weapon, such as when sitting down. I would like a holster that has a separate square piece that would give it the appearance of a wallet when sitting. I have a holster for a P238 that tries to do this, but because of how it was stitched together, it still tends to have the outline of a handgun when sitting.
  • "Ruger SFAR"--Shooting Illustrated. A look at Ruger's new AR style Small-Frame Autoloading Rifle platform that shoots .308 using a receiver set not much larger than those used for AR15s. The result is not only more compact than most AR10/308 rifles, but boasts lighter weights without having to resort to exotic materials like titanium or magnesium. The article notes some various places where Ruger has shaved off a fraction of an ounce here or there, but the big savings seems to be this: "The bolt, bolt carrier and barrel extension, while not compatible with AR-15-size units, are otherwise almost the exact same overall size. Both are machined from a high-nickel-content-alloy steel, which is stronger and lighter than traditional units on either AR-15s or AR-10s." That's probably half a pound right there. 
  • "3 Things You Do That Make You a Target For Crooks"--Jim Wilson, NRA Family. The points he raises are: (i) letting your guard down when at home (he recommends locking your exterior doors even when at home and always keep a defensive weapon nearby); (ii) only carrying a defensive weapon when you think you need it; and (iii) lack of awareness (e.g., too intent on your cell phone or listening to music). 
  • Massad Ayoob links to a recent article going over a deadly force self-defense case out of Washington where the not-guilty verdict was heavily dependent on a disparity of force argument. "On November 14, 2022, the Whatcom County Superior Court found Kamuran Chabuk not guilty of a 2nd Degree Assault charge nine years after a self-defense shooting in Bellingham." Also, "[t]he case presented some critical factual issues including the presence of multiple aggressors, disparity in the size of the so-called victim, and the potential for a concerted attempt on the part of at least two aggressors to take away the Defendant’s gun and use it against him." The article continues to go over relevant facts and legal arguments.

"The ORIGINAL Christmas Dessert"--Townsends (15 min.)
History as well as a recipe and how-to. This particular recipe does not need to sit for weeks as recipes from later periods seem to indicate. 

Prepping & Survival:
  • "Emergency Binders: What Should Preppers Put in Them?"--Mind 4 Survival. You should obviously keep copies of important documents in a fireproof box or safe, but you also need to keep copies either in a binder or scanned and saved on a thumb drive--or, better yet, both. But what should you include as "important documents"? That is what this article is about and it has a pretty comprehensive list, although I would like to reiterate that it should include copies of all insurance policies and declaration pages (whether health, life, property, auto, and so on), and copies of the printed proofs of insurance that should be carried in your vehicles. Also, having had to deal with important documents where holes have been punched through words or corners bent and covering up information, please place the documents in pockets or sleeves before putting in a binder. That doesn't mean that every page necessarily has to be in a separate sleeve--insurance policies and mortgage papers, for instances, can run dozens or hundreds of pages--but that they be put in a pocket of some sort so the documents aren't damaged or mutilated.  
  • "Vehicles As Weapons"--The Prepper Journal. As the article notes, vehicles can be used as weapons either by striking/running over people or to carry bombs. He relates:
    Vehicle bombs can be complicated, or they can be simple. As any military vet of the more recent wars in Iraq and Afghanistan can tell you the use of IED (improvised explosive devices) has come a long way for the days of Viet Nam – In Viet Nam the military jeeps had the gas tank under the drivers seat, you actually lifted the drivers seat up to refuel the vehicles. The Viet Cong figured this out and used it as a weapon early on. The gas tank opening would accommodate a frag grenade so if you pulled the pin but left the handle on and used plain old scotch tape to keep the handle in place, you simply dropped this into the gas tank. It would take a couple of hours before the gasoline ate away the scotch tape and bingo, wherever the jeep happened to be at that moment.

    Another cute trick was using a flare round from the old style flare pistols. You could disassemble the old rounds, duck tape the magnesium package which has a self-contained oxidizer made of potassium chlorinate to a gas tank and then wrap the parachute around an axle. A few revolutions and the ignited gets set off by the pull, like the jerk of the parachute when it is in normal use. Modern rounds do not “facilitate” this any longer, but many other available igniters do.

    Bank robbers along the other side of our Southern border had a favorite. They would put explosives in an old vehicle attached to a 12v battery but not close the circuit – wire it to both terminals. Normally on the floor in the front seat and then set the back seat on fire and call the fire department. First thing firemen did was douse the vehicle with water, hopefully completing the circuit by soaking the battery terminals with water and “boom” – injured firefighters, police rushing to the scene, and then they would rob a bank on the other side of town. Sound far fetched? The fail-safe is the fire would eventually achieve a similar effect.

    But now, with a valid drivers license, something some states pass out like the free mints at a restaurants hostess station, and a valid credit card – for sale at every Walmart for cash, and you have rented a potential weapon. No distinguishing marks, no smoking fuse, other than the driver, no rifle barrels pointed out the window and 4,000+ pound at 6′ wide and 7′ tall, most capable of accelerating from a normal street speed to 60+ mph in seconds. From a clinical point of view, this is an excellent weapon. Inexpensive, leaves a cold/close trail, and if you survive you just walk away, and in most gun-free zones this is a possibility if for not the off-duty police officer or the on-duty policemen, moments away. The reality is that in the case of most on-duty policeman they are moments away when seconds count. And these incidents take only seconds.

  • "The homestead cat"--Backwoods Home Magazine. Although the modern Ibsen woman likes cats as a substitute for the babies she will never bear, cats actually serve a useful purpose around the homestead in controlling vermin. The author relates, for instance:
It’s amazing how much damage voles, mice, ground squirrels, and chipmunks can do to your crops. They girdle fruit trees in the winter, eat into melons and squash, nibble the inside out of tomatoes, and dig up corn just after it germinates just to eat the seed below ground. And these critters are also very prolific, often having several big litters of young in one summer. Without a cat around we’d soon be run out by these little varmints.

Some additional advice:

    We’ve found it best to get a kitten. When you raise a kitten, you can quickly correct any bad habits like getting on the counter, scratching furniture, or climbing the curtains. They quickly learn to use an indoor kitty litter box while some adult cats just won’t.

    A squirt gun with water in it is a good correction for bad behavior. Keep one loaded and handy. Also provide the kitten something “good” to scratch and climb on such as a scratching post or kitty condo. If you provide an enclosed cat litter box, keep it clean of waste. The kitten will quickly learn where to go potty and have no mistakes. Mittens prefers to “go” outside and seldom uses her box.

    If you get an older cat, do make sure you keep it inside for a few days until it gets the lay of the land. It needs to know where home is and come when called. (A special treat when it does is a huge help.) When you simply release a new adult cat to the barn or house, it often will freak out and run away.

    Some say that female cats make the best mousers and that a female with kittens is the very best of all. Not really. Mittens is a female but she was spayed when she was six months old. I found out early on that when you have a female cat, she’ll soon have a litter of kittens. You quickly run out of people who want a cute kitten. Soon the leftover female kittens have a litter and you’re overrun with cats. Hungry cats are not good mousers; they’re often too weak and lethargic to chase pests.

     A male cat can be a terrific mouser. Remember Monte? But please have him neutered. Males that are not neutered have the foul habit of spraying urine around the place marking “their property.” Put bluntly, it stinks. In addition, male cats will travel great distances looking for love. This puts them in danger of becoming coyote or fox bait, being run over by traffic, getting shot, or getting bitten up by a rival male. A neutered male stays home and is a much more delightful pet/hunter.

Even neutered, my experience has been that male cats will still spray urine to mark territory. I would recommend having no more than one male cat at a time--not even a male kitten with an adult male.

    The city of Buffalo in Western New York has been battered by the bomb cyclone that continues to lash the eastern seaboard and mid-west, bringing with it blizzards, freezing temperatures and flooding. 

    Families are pleading for help on behalf of loved ones stuck in their homes without power. Some have issued calls for aid while trapped in cars on roads and highways blanketed by several feet of snow.

    The National Guard has been deployed to help with rescue efforts after emergency services were overwhelmed and police vehicles and ambulances were left unable to travel in the Arctic conditions. Hotlines set up to help the stranded and desperate are also overwhelmed. 
  • Reuters reports: "Thousands lose power after three substations targeted in Washington state, sheriff says." Not a lot of detail other than the substations were vandalized, but nothing taken. Since the area was near Tacoma--i.e., the heartland of wokeness in the region--I would expect that some leftist group, be it eco-terrorists, Antifa, or even BLM--to be the more likely perpetrators. 
  • On that note, Mike Cernovich warns us to "Brace For Impact." He notes that we have entered what Heinlein would term the "crazy years": drivers are crazy and aggressive; wearing status based goods is asking to be robbed; widespread mental illness/demonic possession; we will see an increase in murder-suicides as the economy tanks; Mexican drug cartels and other organized crime are once again on the ascendance and are carving up the country. His advice is to be more low key, especially about your wealth or success; learn from what has happened in Central and South America as they likely point how crime will develop here; avoid becoming a high profile conservative as those will likely be targeted by security services; continue self-defense/combat training; and do no despair.
  • The Chinese Century: "China’s shrinking working-age population to send ripples through global economy." Two key points: "UN says number of Chinese aged between 15 and 64 will fall by more than 60 per cent this century" and "India set to overtake China as world’s most populous country next year and age much more slowly". 


PsycHacks (6 min.). In other words, to women, men are a means to an end, and if a better "job" presents itself, they will at least consider it if not completely jump ship.


PsycHacks (11 min.). That is, to men, women are the goal.

News & Analysis:

    The FBI handed nearly $3.5 million of taxpayers money to Twitter to pay its staff to handle requests from the bureau to ban accounts.

    A Twitter employee wrote in a February 2020 email that the company's Safety, Content & Law Enforcement (SCALE) had 'collected $3,415,323' in less than two years from the FBI for 'law-enforcement related projects.'

    The email, which was revealed by journalist Michael Shellenberger, stated that SCALE had instituted a 'reimbursement program' in exchange for devoting staff hours to 'processing requests from the FBI'.

That shows that Twitter's SCALE people were "acting under color of law". Let slip the lawyers of lawfare!

  • The fairer sex: "8 teen girls charged in 'swarming' murder of man in downtown Toronto: 'You think you've seen it all'." (See also this article). According to the articles, three of the teens are 13 years old, three are 14 and two are 16. Three of them had criminal records. They stabbed a man to death when he intervened to stop them from stealing a small bottle of liquor from a women the man was sitting with. The "swarm" had been involved in another altercation earlier that evening. Although in a busy area of Toronto, near Union Station, no surveillance video of the teens has been released, nor have any names or descriptions. Nevertheless, Toronto police "are asking anyone who saw the the group of teens that night to contact police." Sort of hard to do if authorities won't describe them, but okay. All this makes me wonder if this is going to turn out to be a case of diversity.
  • Do you see the problem here? "The Conservative Case for Compulsory Voting" by Adam Ellwanger, The American Mind. Ellwanger raises two main points: (i) the U.S. has very low turnout among people eligible to vote; and (ii) although the U.S. has a very high rate of registered voters that actually vote (94%), "bad actors can use the inactive 6 percent on the voting rolls in some profoundly undemocratic ways—ways that could certainly flip elections in a nation that is divided down the middle politically." His solution to the corruption is to simply require everyone to vote that is eligible to vote. To understand why his solution would work, or so he claims, you have to understand the problem; which is, according to Ellwanger, that we really can't anticipate how many people to vote so if there is manipulation of the vote it makes it harder to detect. If everyone had to vote, however, he believes that we would have a good idea of how many ballots would be cast and it would therefore be easier to detect anomalies. This sounds good in theory, but Ellwanger's solution rests on the problem being illicit voting by ballots being injected into the system from imaginary voters. And we have certainly seen this with mysterious boxes of votes suddenly appearing to bump up a trend line to favor Democrats. But that isn't necessarily the main problem. Rather, the primary problems seem to be (i) vote harvesting (i.e., Democrats going through vulnerable populations and either convincing these vulnerable people to vote in a particular way or simply filling out the mail-in ballot for these people) and (ii) manipulating the vote count. Requiring everyone to vote won't solve vote harvesting--in fact, it will make it much easier--nor will it do anything about the post election manipulation of the canvassing of the votes which, again, mostly revolves around mail-in voting. The biggest step we can take to secure elections is to follow what most other countries do: no mail-in ballots, requiring a photo ID to vote, and ensuring that people can't vote twice such as making them dip a finger in indelible ink after they have voted.
  • "Biden's border crisis is fueling growing cartel armies - now armed to the teeth and rivaling Mexico's military, warns TODD BENSMAN... so why is no one talking about this threat to American interests?" Because it benefits powerful interests in the government. 
  • "Major 401(k) changes will see government give some workers $1,000, impose automatic enrollment at up to 10% of pay, raise age for required withdrawals and allow rainy day savings accounts." Basically, the legislation will force people to put more money into their retirement accounts while encouraging them to delay drawing funds from their accounts. 
    Authored by US Senators Rob Portman, an Ohio Republican, and Ben Cardin, a Maryland Democrat, the bipartisan bill seeks to expand the number of Americans participating in retirement plans. 

    The bill calls on 401(k) and 403(b) retirement accounts to automatically enroll employees starting in 2025 at between 3 percent and 10 percent of pay, which lawmakers noted will also see more low income workers have retirement savings, the Wall Street Journal reports. 

    It will also increase the savings rate on the accounts by 1 percent point each year until it hits 10 to 15 percent. 

    Older workers will also be allowed to make 'catch-up' contributions to their retirement accounts, with anyone over 50 allowed to deposit up to $7,500 a year. 

    By 2025, those between 60 to 63 years old will be able to deposit at least $11,250 extra a year. 

The article also indicates that "[t]he change would allow households earning $71,000 or less who contribute $2,000 into their retirement accounts to get a matching 50 percent government deposit." It will also raise the age that you are required to start drawing from your account from 72 (where it is currently) to 73 next year and 75 in 2033. The financial industry is the group lobbying for the changes, probably because, as the article notes, "Brokers, financial assistants and insurers are poised to benefit from the changes as they would make more money from fees of the higher-earning retirement accounts." This also tells me that there are those in government expecting Social Security to collapse and the importation of workers to stave off the collapse is apparently not working. 

    Sander argued that since professors tend to direct teaching to the middle ability in the classroom, dramatically lower-skilled students, as reflected in their admissions metrics, are left behind in the current, if not torrent, of the presented material.

    The devastating results on academic performance of being downwardly mismatched are even more dramatic in law schools, because on average they're more intense and difficult than college. These bad outcomes further manifest after law school through significantly increased difficulty passing the bar exam.

    Sander demonstrated that Black law students--who on average receive the largest admission preferences--tended to have low grades in law school and were far more likely than whites to fail the bar. Both of these phenomena were due to racial preferences, not race.

    Without set-asides, Blacks attending appropriately matched schools would earn grades comparable to Whites on average, and the bar-passage gap would substantially narrow. This would increase the number of Black lawyers in the community. Racial preferences hurt Blacks.

Well, as I've noted many times before, Liberals don't actually care if what they force on us actually help anyone so long as it makes them feel better about themselves. Case in point are the events reported in "The War on Merit Takes a Bizarre Turn" in City Journal. That article reports that "administrators at Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology (TJ) have been withholding notifications of National Merit awards from the school’s families, most of them Asian, thus denying students the right to use those awards to boost their college-admission prospects and earn scholarships." Why would the school do this? "This episode has emerged amid the school district’s new strategy of 'equal outcomes for every student, without exception.'" 

  • Speaking of race: In his post, "A Vibrant Christmas," Vox Popoli notes that the recent shooting between two groups at the Mall of America leaving one person dead was, as most of us already suspected, between groups of blacks. Vox comments:
    I used to love going to Rosedale, Southdale, and occasionally, the Galleria, at Christmastime. From the time I was a little boy, they were vast and magical Winter Wonderlands, where children could roam freely and window-shop. I used to wander alone from one end of the mall to the other, with particular attention paid to B. Daltons and Games by James. ...

    ...

    When I started working at Dayton’s at the age of 15, I began seeing Christmas from the other side, from the retailer’s perspective, and it was every bit as magical. Dayton’s was one of the anchor department stores at all the Dales, and it was always exciting when the Christmas decorations would start going up the day after Thanksgiving. The sights, the lights, and the smells, taken in sum, were nothing but pure and unadulterated joy.

    This sense of communal magic and wonder is one of the many things that vibrancy has cost America. Perhaps it wasn’t important, perhaps it wasn’t a significant part of the Christmas season, but I loved it as a child and it grieves me to know that it is part of the world that we have lost.
    A close friend of the victim, Hawi Abdurahman, said the shooting never should have occurred at the Mall of America in the days leading up to Christmas.

    'Street code is you don't do that stuff around families, like kids at that,' he said. 'This should not be happening in a mall where there's children, people shopping.'

Well, they're not so much rules as guidelines. 

    ... I live on a ranch smack in the middle of the US Heartland. There are 3000 people or so in this entire county. We're a hundred miles from the nearest airport able to handle commercial jetliners. Yet last week, just prior to the "polar vortex", the sky over our property was a fluffy white tic tac toe game played by what appeared to be large jet tankers belching out ugly non-dissipating contrails which were smudged and smeared by the wind into expansive blotches that blotted out the sun. This has been going on ever since we moved here nearly 20 years ago.

    There is no way to explain this in terms of normal air traffic generating the usual vapor-laden jet contrails. The "contrails" do not look or behave like water vapor or ice crystals, and there is no reason that we should ever see more than a single jet airliner overhead, maybe two at rush hour (the usual number on a clear day is 0). I've checked the airline schedules, and there's simply no way. The government is once again trying to kill us, and you'd better believe that this record "cold snap" is taking quite a death toll.
  • "Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Bivalent Vaccine." This paper is based on a study of employees of the Cleveland Clinic starting on the day vaccines were first made available to them and for 12 months afterward. The risk of catching Covid increased over time, even having the vaccine, giving the vaccine an overall effectiveness of only 30%. 
  • "Lessons to learn from Great Britain’s declining Christianity"--The Captain's Journal. Perhaps one of the most misunderstood and misapplied scriptures in the Bible is the the parable of the lost sheep (Matthew 18: 10–14) where the shepherd with 100 sheep loses one and so leaves the 99 sheep and go to search out the lost sheep to return it to the fold. I'm sure that to those listening to Christ it was apparent that the 99 would have been returned to an enclosure or other safe location and watched over and cared for by others while the shepherd searched for the lost sheep. But what I see in practice today is a complete lack of concern for the well being of the 99 in order to locate lost one. That is, at least in my experience as a member of the LDS Church, I see too many leaders that seem willing to lose a substantial number of the 99 while they try to find (that is, woo back) the one that wondered off. Most of the time, in order to woo back the one that left these leaders will try and soften things a bit that might have "offended" the person coming back. For instance, in the 1980s--at least in my corner of the LDS Church--unwed single mothers were suddenly portrayed as "heroes" instead of sluts sinners, and if there was anyone to be held in contempt, it was the father of the unwanted baby. Similarly, women that divorced their husbands were also somehow deemed a heroic because, the belief went, they surely must have been fleeing some sort of abusive relationship. It has now progressed such that people are afraid of saying something critical about homosexuals and gay marriage. 
    So it was refreshing to read this piece from The Captain's Journal about conclusions drawn from polling on religiousity conducted in Britain. The cited article is "Lessons to learn from Great Britain's declining Christianity" in The Christian Post

    It begins by relating something we see in similar polling in the United States: those reporting that they belong to an organized religion are, overall, declining with the only exception being among evangelical denominations. The article continues:

    First, it is important to recognize those claiming “no religion” have risen exponentially to 37% by the 2021 Census data. The head of Humanists UK, Andrew Copson, claims the census numbers “confirm that the biggest demographic change in England and Wales of the last 10 years has been the dramatic growth of the non-religious.” The problem has not been other religions converting those in the UK, but of the British leaving the Church out of a seeming lack of commitment. Most church leaders understand this dynamic, and many mainline denominational churches have attempted to liberalize and become more “relevant” to modern society. This liberalization has invariably meant moving away from previously accepted Church doctrine based on scripture. In doing so, these denominations have brought the opposite results of what they sought.

    British researcher and writer John Hayward has studied the hard data. He particularly focuses on the numbers of the decline by denomination in the U.K. His writings give the precise current numbers and trend lines for all British denominations going back decades and have led to clear conclusions. According to Hayward's studies, “All the evangelical denominations are growing, except for the Brethren. By contrast, all the mixed denominations are declining, with the liberal ones declining the most.” In the United Kingdom, the majority of those identifying as Christian was part of the established Anglican Church, including the Anglican community of the Church of Scotland and Church of Wales.

    Other similar long-established mainline denominations, like the Methodists, contained the vast majority. Even with the rise in numbers of the scripturally faithful Evangelical Churches, the overall numbers continue to plummet as the elderly in now liberal denominations pass away.   

    Hayward studied the specific deviations in accepted doctrine of Churches seeking relevancy versus those unmoved and found:

    “To date, no growing church has adopted same-sex marriage. All of these denominations hold firm to historic Christianity. Indeed, they are all evangelical in doctrine...Not all denominations are declining (in the UK); there are growing ones: churches that stand on historic Christianity and against the progressive ideology...I can see that the growing evangelical congregations will have surpassed the liberal and mixed denominations by the middle of the century.”

    Critical to note is that other religions/denominations standing firm to established doctrines, like Orthodox Judaism and Islam, have likewise not seen the decline of those Churches moving to progressive ideology. I think it is important to note that within denominations, individual churches and even subgroupings of denominations have stood firm. That is particularly true of parts of the Anglican Community.

 As PGF, the author of the The Captain's post, comments: "Note carefully that it’s not the congregation’s lack of commitment that is causing them to wander, but church leadership’s lack of commitment to correct doctrine in truth. Casual observers appear around the edges of a church, coming and going, but those in Christ Jesus are inherently attracted to sound teaching coupled with worship in spirit and in truth (John 4:24), for God seeks such a people."

Friday, December 23, 2022

VIDEO: "Exploring Ghost Town Frozen in Time ..."

 

Exploring with Wade (16 min.)

Kitsault was (is) a company mining town constructed in the early 1980s and apparently abandoned in late 1983. It had houses, duplexes, apartment buildings, shopping mall, recreation center, a guest/visitor lodge, school, and hospital. And everything is remarkably well preserved with furniture, fixtures, books, etc., still in place. The town is privately owned, is apparently difficult to reach, and looked after by hired care takers, so nothing has been looted or vandalized. It would be ideal as a giant movie or television set for any production supposed to take place in the late 1970s or early 1980s. Although there is minimal maintenance being carried out, it still is remarkable how well everything is preserved. It really looks like you could walk into most any building and immediately take up residence. 

Wednesday, December 21, 2022

POTD: Spooky House

 

Source: "The world's most spooky abandoned houses"

Lessons Learned: Don't Hunt for a Criminal After Calling 911

 This lesson comes from a Daily Mail article titled: "'It wasn't me': Footage shows millionaire tech entrepreneur's final words after being fatally shot by a trigger-happy cop while defending his home from a suspected burglar." The gist of the story is that about 12:30 AM on November 15, Rajan 'Raj' Moonesinghe apparently believed that there was a burglar inside his house, although there was no evidence of an intruder. For some reason, Moonesinghe believed the best course of action was to call 911, grab his AR, and then go outside to peer back into his house through windows and doors to see if he could spot the supposed burglar, eventually firing a couple of times into his house just as officers were arriving on the scene. The police, of course, promptly shot Moonesinghe before they could even finish ordering him to drop his gun. Literally: "Drop the" ... *bang, bang, bang, bang* ... "gun!"

    So, what can we learn from this incident? 

  1. First of all, if your judgment or reasoning is impaired or you are just plain stupid, you shouldn't be handling a firearm. Although there is nothing in the article to indicate that Moonesinghe was using medications or intoxicated, in the video you can hear him talking to someone--presumably the non-existent "intruder"--before he let off his two shots. Plus the fact that he was outside his house and shooting inside. These facts suggests to me that his judgment or reasoning may have been impaired, whatever the reason for it. 
  2. Consider using a more discrete firearm if you have to exit your house. Moonsinghe was not in a situation calling for a rifle. He was not under attack by a group or gang; and he did not live in a rural area where he might be shooting longer distances at a predatory animal. He was in a suburb with houses crowded close together. I've noted before that if I am investigating the proverbial "bump in the dark" outside the house, I prefer a handgun that can be concealed in a pocket or under a jacket for the very reason that if someone sees me they won't see the firearm and call the police or shoot me because I'm armed.  
  3. Don't be acting like the "bad guy" when the police arrive. Most of the time, this bit of advice is couched in terms of what to do with your firearm when police arrive or are expected to arrive: things like putting the firearm down or reholstering it before police arrive. Moonsinghe might have lived if he had followed this advice. But there was more than just the fact that he had his firearm. As noted above, he was standing outside his house and had just barely shot his firearm into the house as the police rolled up. Unfortunately, the video doesn't show how Moonsinghe acted when he turned toward the police with his rifle: it shows the rifle in a low ready and then the video freezes or has been edited (although the audio continues) so we can't see if it stayed that way or he raised his weapon.
  4. Finally, police and firearms don't mix. I'm not talking about police competence with firearms. I'm talking about the fact that as soon as you or someone else calls 911, you (or whomever called 911) has just invoked a bunch of armed people showing up at your house ready to do violence, and they will do that violence to you if you in any way look frightening or threatening. So, absent some exigent circumstance like trying to protect loved one in some other part of the house, your checking out your house or yard, room clearing, or whatever you want to call it, ends as soon as you or someone else calls 911. At that point, you transition to waiting for the police to arrive, preferably next to the telephone with the dispatcher on the line and lights on so officers can see clearly and not acting like the "bad guy" (see point 3). 

Monday, December 19, 2022

The Docent's Memo (December 19, 2022)

 

Demonstrated Concepts LLC (8 min.). The author makes his argument for why the birdshead grip shotgun is superior to the SBS.

Firearms & Self-Defense:

Are there better pistols out there for specific tasks, such as defense, or hunting/field use? Sure. Are there many pistols out there that are as versatile as the three, 4″ barreled models and calibers mentioned in this post? Not really.
  • Some firearms history: "The Lee-Enfield No. 4 Mk 1 Rifle"--Shooting Illustrated. This model of the Lee-Enfield was still in development when the British Expeditionary Force was surrounded at Dunkirk and had to abandon their rifles--some 200,000--when evacuating. Combined with the formation of a Home Guard in Britain that also needed rifles, the No. 4 Mk 1 began being produced in the United States by Savage. "U.S.-made Savage/Stevens No. 4s numbered 1.2 million, with Long Branch contributing another 910,000, Fazakerley 619,000, Maltby 737,000 and Shirley with 665,000 for a grand total of 4.1 million produced."
  • "When It’s Not A Gunfight"--Shooting Illustrated. Sheriff Jim Wilson discusses less than lethal weapons, mentioning blackjacks, saps, walking canes, and pepper spray. Be sure to check you local and state laws to determine what is legal to use and whether it is considered a deadly weapon: I seem to remember coming across some federal case law suggesting that keys held between your fingers in order to rake someone's face or eyes could be considered a deadly or dangerous weapon. 
  • "Don’t Use Bird Shot for Self Defense"--Active Response Training. Key bit:
    People stop their attacks for a variety of reasons after they have been shot.  Some stop because of pain.  Others stop because of shock.  Still others are physically incapacitated by blood loss or organ damage.  We can’t rely on shock or pain to stop an attacker who is exceptionally motivated, mentally ill, drunk, or on drugs.  We must achieve physical incapacitation.  That happens either by hitting the brain or upper spinal cord (causing death or paralysis) or by doing enough damage to organs and blood vessels that the bad guy collapses from blood loss. 
 
    Birdshot doesn’t reliably penetrate deeply enough to hit those vital targets, especially if your target is wearing heavy clothing or behind a piece of cover.

Remember that then-Vice President Dick Cheney shot a hunting buddy in the face with a shotgun loaded with birdshot that caused only minor damage.
  • Speaking of shotguns: "3 Tips That Will Make You a Better Wingshooter"--American Hunter. The body of the article refers to them as 3 steps rather than tips. They are: (i) tune or adjust the shotgun to fit you and then practice; (ii) learn to correctly mount the shotgun; (iii) follow through (i.e., don't stop swinging the shotgun when you take the shot). 
  • "The Surefire DSF vs The Nightstick SLF"--The Mag Life. A comparison between two combination fore end/weapon lights for shotguns. Most of the differences between the two seem rather negligible but the set up of the controls are different enough that they warrant consideration:
    Both setups offer an ambidextrous option for activating the light as well as a momentary and constant mode. However, the lights differ a fair bit in how they execute this. The Nightstick SFL offers you one big ambidextrous button. It’s large, easy to find with your hand, and it provides a tactile, clicky design. The constant mode is a single press, the momentary is a long press, and the light shuts off when released.

    On the flip side, the Surefire DSF offers you four buttons to activate the light. Each side of the DSF has two buttons. The forward button is the momentary option, and the rearward button is the constant On. Both buttons are larger and heavily raised for a natural press. The fifth smaller button allows you to swap between 200 and 600 lumens.


The History Guy (13 min.)

News & Headlines:

    A Christian leader has blasted the Biden administration for “creating an atmosphere of lawlessness” by ignoring attacks on churches and houses of worship nationwide, which have nearly tripled over the last four years, according to a startling new report.

    These assaults ranged from deadly to defacing, covered every region of the country and denominational background, and often sprang from pro-abortion domestic terrorism or other forms of left-wing enmity against biblical morality.

    Offenders committed at least 420 acts of hostility against 397 separate churches in the United States between January 2018 and September 2022. These cases include everything from arson and gun-related violence to vandalism and bomb threats, the copiously documented, 84-page report specifies.

    The attacks show the comprehensive nature of anti-Christian violence. Assaults against churches occurred in 45 states and the nation’s capital, Washington, D.C. Victimized congregations span the theological gamut from evangelical, Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, mainline Protestant, non-denominational churches, Seventh-Day Adventist, to Unitarian-Universalists and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (formerly known as Mormons). Assailants targeted parishes primarily attended by white, black, and Asian (specifically Korean and Taiwanese) Christians, as well as multiethnic congregations.

    The report documents one homicide, numerous arsons, bomb threats (real and fake), and a pervasive desecration of holy items. Vandals regularly smashed crosses, statues, and headstones in cemeteries; vandalized carvings of the Ten Commandments; set fire to a Nativity scene; and smeared feces on a statue of the Virgin Mary. They tore up a Bible and desecrated an American flag in a Primitive Methodist church in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania. Denver’s Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary Catholic Church suffered two drive-by shootings this August. Smashed windows and spray-painted doors became ubiquitous. The number of assaults peaked this May through July but has remained elevated compared to historical figures, which usually number in the single digits.

    Remember when the FBI raided Trump’s home supposedly looking for “nuclear secrets” a few months back? Guess how that turned out?

    I’ll let the quislings at the Washinton [sic] Post spell it out:

Federal agents and prosecutors have come to believe former president Donald Trump’s motive for allegedly taking and keeping classified documents was largely his ego and a desire to hold on to the materials as trophies or mementos, according to people familiar with the matter.

In other words, Trump was keeping souvenirs, as everyone else does.

    This month’s bombshell indictment of Igor Danchenko, the Russian national who is charged with lying to the F.B.I. and whose work turns out to have been the main source for Christopher Steele’s notorious dossier, is being treated as a major embarrassment for much of the news media — and, if the charges stick, that’s exactly what it is.

    Put media criticism aside for a bit. What this indictment further exposes is that James Comey’s F.B.I. became a Bureau of Dirty Tricks, mitigated only by its own incompetence — like a mash-up of Inspector Javert and Inspector Clouseau. Donald Trump’s best move as president (about which I was dead wrong at the time) may have been to fire him.

    If you haven’t followed the drip-drip-drip of revelations, late in 2019 Michael E. Horowitz, the Justice Department’s inspector general, published a damning report detailing “many basic and fundamental errors” by the F.B.I. in seeking Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court warrants to surveil Carter Page, the American businessman fingered in the dossier as a potential link between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin.

    Shortly afterward, Rosemary Collyer, the court’s presiding judge, issued her own stinging rebuke of the bureau: “The frequency with which representations made by F.B.I. personnel turned out to be unsupported or contradicted by information in their possession, and with which they withheld information detrimental to their case, calls into question whether information contained in other F.B.I. applications is reliable,” she wrote.

    Here a question emerged: Were the F.B.I.’s errors a matter of general incompetence or of bias? There appears to be a broad pattern of F.B.I. agents overstating evidence that corroborates their suspicions. That led to travesties such as the bureau hounding the wrong man in the 2001 anthrax attacks.

    The U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights is investigating New York Law School to determine whether Judge Judy Sheindlin’s scholars program violates Title IX.

    In January, Sheindlin gave a $5 million legacy gift to NYLS to establish the Judge Judy Sheindlin Honors Scholars Program, open to women who primarily have financial need and who have the credentials to merit the scholarship. ...

    Mark Perry, professor emeritus of economics at the Flint campus of the University of Michigan, contacted the OCR to allege that the scholars program is “illegal,” since it is only for women, according to his Twitter page. ...

    Reached late Monday, Sheindlin responded to Law.com’s request for comment with some choice words for Perry. ... “Professor Perry’s assault on scholarships for 10 academically gifted women who can’t afford law school is petty. He says he has filed 700 such actions. He has too much time on his hands.”

I'm always fascinated by how the Left is always is upset when anti-discrimination laws are used against them.

    Fox News reports Governor Jay Inslee’s hand-picked Professional Educator Standards Board also informed its sister agencies at the November 30 Governor’s Equity Summit that it wants a “cultural shift” towards an “indigenous relational pedagogy.”

    According to the PESB, in contrast to “white supremacy culture,” “indigenous relational pedagogy” includes things such as “slowness and deliberateness,” “humility and gentleness” and “responsibility and reciprocity.”

Don't forget other indigenous traits such as de facto enslavement of women and excessive violence. 

    Located in the Bay of Bengal, North Sentinel Island was a national news story in 2018 when a Christian missionary John Allen Chau attempted to bring the word of Christ to these people, who he considered lived on Satan’s Island. He knew the risks, and after bribing some fisherman to get him within sight of the island’s shoreline, he met his maker—literally. The Sentinelese butchered the missionary and buried Chau on the beach where it remains today as multiple efforts from local authorities to retrieve the body proved unsuccessful—the natives kept showing up in force.

    In 2006, two Indian fishermen were illegally fishing in the waters around the island and got intoxicated, crashing their ship into the surrounding reefs. Witnesses from other fishing boats in the area witnessed Sentinelese men emerging from the dense jungle with weapons and butchering the two men. They later displayed their bodies like scarecrows on the beach as a warning.

Unlike us, they take border security seriously.

    It has come to light that the 12 Republican senators who threw their support behind the so-called “Respect for Marriage Act” (RMA) were swayed by cash and political clout wielded by a group of prominent donors, several of whom identify as “gay.”  

    At least ten GOP senators were needed to join Senate Democrats to reach the required 60-vote threshold for passage of the bill, which mandates that all 50 states must recognize same-sex “marriages,” even in the event that the Supreme Court overturns its 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision.   

    The New York Times reported:   

    Behind the scenes, a group of influential Republican donors and operatives, including some of the party’s most prominent gay leaders with long experience prodding their party to embrace L.G.B.T.Q. rights, banded together with the bill’s proponents in Congress for a coordinated, $1.7 million campaign to persuade G.O.P. senators that backing it would give them a political edge. 

    Their quiet work helps explain how a bill to ensure recognition of same-sex marriages across the country went from being the subject of an election-season political maneuver that few expected to be enacted to an initiative embraced by a decisive majority of senators, and an unexpected victory for the gay rights movement that will be one of the final acts of the Democratic-controlled Congress. 

The recent, lamentable vote over the so-called Respect for Marriage Act revealed a new breed of Republican: The “personally pro-marriage, but” Republican. Like their spiritual forebears, the “personally pro-life, but” Democrats, they strenuously present themselves as people of deep moral conviction, who have equally compelling reasons to lay aside their views and act on other people’s convictions for political reasons. Here are six such explanations offered by Republican senators who supported the Disrespect for Marriage Act, and the reason their rationales fall short.

Peter Grant: "Is the left-wing politicization of our military a threat to our country?"

The short answer is "yes." He cites an article from Cynical Publius indicating that "the resistance" to President Trump...