The Daily Mail reports that "Girl, 14, 'gang-raped by up to ten children aged 11-16 was taken to a park by her boyfriend to be "loaned out" for sex assaults more than once, with the attacks filmed on their phones'." The incident occurred in a wooded area called Kabouterbos in Kortrijk, West Flanders, Belgium. Although the identity of the rapists have not been released, the article relates that "[p]rosecutors arrested ten suspects aged between 11 and 16 - all reported by local outlets to be boys of 'immigrant origin' - and hauled them in for interrogation." The next question, probably never to be revealed, is what type of immigrants. Statistically, they are members of the "religion of peace" from Africa or Afghanistan.
But it is apparently illegal to point out such inconvenient truths in German. Modernity News reports (h/t Vox Day) that a German politician (District council member Marie-Thérèse Kaiser of the AfD Party) was been found guilty of ‘incitement’ by the Verden regional court in Lower Saxony 2021 posts showing the government’s own statistics on crimes committed by migrants, specifically rape, and asked why they are so disproportionately high.
The European Conservative adds:
The verdict has now also caught the attention of X CEO Elon Musk. He retweeted a post summarizing the punishment and wrote: “Are you saying the penalty was imposed for repeating accurate government statistics? Was there anything wrong with what she said?”
But the truth is irrelevant, at least according to the judge presiding over the case, Heiko Halbfas, who stated: “Those who attack human dignity cannot invoke freedom of speech.” The article continues: "Kaiser deliberately created an image in the minds of others that led to hatred of a nationally determined group, the district newspaper reported." Is there any human dignity in being 41 times as likely to commit gang rapes?
Of course, it is not just rapes, but other violent crimes which are being perpetrated at much higher rates by migrants than natives. Going back to the Modernity News article, it relates:
As we have repeatedly highlighted, crime in Germany has exploded to levels not seen in close to a decade, with a huge increase in migrants committing offences, especially violent crimes.
Statistics from the German Interior Ministry released last month show that the number of foreign suspects rocketed up to around 923,000 in 2023, correlating to a whopping 18 percent increase in just one year.
The data further shows that 41 percent of all crime suspects in Germany are foreigners, despite only representing 15 percent of the total population.
Overall there has been a massive 14.5% increase in the number of non-German suspects of violent crime.
The report notes that there has been a 5.5% increase in crime and an 8.6% rise in violent crime in 2023, which is now at a 15 year high.
Opposition parties on the right, including AfD, have argued that the data shows the urgent need for a cap on immigration, and have argued that such ‘integration’ policies are a key component of the coalition government’s race to naturalize millions of foreigners, thereby masking the truth of who is behind the crime surge.
Indeed, the stats don’t even provide the full shocking picture of what is happening because many of the “German” suspects are really foreigners who have obtained German citizenship, or they are Second or third generation migrants.
But, similar to the U.S., the German government insists that it actually conservatives that are the biggest threat.
Finally, Vox Day observes that Sweden "has gone from having one of the lowest levels of fatal shootings in Europe to one of the highest in just a decade," citing a Powerline article, and asks the obvious question: "I wonder what could have changed in the last ten years."
It's hilarious that the truth is no longer even a defense. Coming soon to a country near you!
ReplyDeleteCivil rights laws, including hate speech laws, are a direct affront to the freedom of association and freedom of speech--and, I would argue, equal protection because such laws are intended and applied to benefit certain groups over others--but courts take the position that is an acceptable limitation on those rights.
DeleteIf I recall my history correctly our founding fathers declared that Mohammed was a false prophet. That should have been inscribed in law back then. Some folks don't believe that.
ReplyDeleteI had a post from many years ago about how Allah appears to be Satan ( https://practicaleschatology.blogspot.com/2017/01/from-archives-is-allah-satan.html )
Delete