In interesting 2022 article from Guns & Ammo comparing the 7 mm Remington Magnum against the .270 Winchester on a safari to Africa. The impetus for this article was a piece written in the 1980s by former Guns & Ammo Hunting Editor Jon Sundra comparing the two and concluding that the 7 mm Rem. Mag. was clearly superior. The author here--Eric Poole--wanting to see if modern bullet designs made any difference. The rest of the article recounts the different animals he shot with the two calibers and some of the bullets used. And while both performed well, his conclusion was ultimately the same as Sundra's: the 7 mm was the better hunting cartridge because the additional power resulted in higher velocities (and, therefore, a flatter trajectory) and more decisive wounding. And, as a side note, the author relates what a springbok’s tail smells like. So you get a bit of a safari hunting story mixed with some discussion of bullets and ballistics.
Exploring practical methods for preparing for the end times, including analysis of end time scripture and prophecy, current events, prepping and self-defense.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
China Uncensored: Why You Should Care About China's Power And Influence
This video from China Uncensored is in response to all the people that say they don't care or are unconcerned about China's power an...
Col. Charles Askins killed an Alaskan Brown bear with a 7mm Magnum the year it came out. He was pleased with its performance on the bear. (from his book "Unrepentant Sinner".)
ReplyDeleteGiven what Poole wrote in his article, I'm not surprise. I just looked up a description of the book--it looks interesting.
Delete