A couple days ago, the New York Post editorial board published an op-ed entitled "The biggest ‘hidden secret’ exposed in the Epstein doc dump," which argues that the biggest hidden secret was that there was no hidden secret. They write:
Cross your fingers that the latest vast dump of Jeffrey Epstein documents marks the beginning of the end of the overhyped hysteria.
Yes, the millions of pages contained some fine gossip, and a bit of genuine scandal: A once-top official in Britain’s Labour party is now facing jail for taking bribes from Epstein; all the details on how the elites work offer some fascinating insights — and the likes of Casey Wasserman likely deserve a few hits to their reputations.
But no sign of the giant pedophile/honeytrap blackmail operation that many once anticipated.
This is just a more verbose version of "don't believe your lying eyes". Everyday I go to the daily news brief at Anonymous Conservative and see emails pulled from the Epstein files that appear to be discussing trafficking in children and women. Is there an open discussion in these emails of what went on? Would you be able to type "honeytrap" into the search bar and get thousands of results? Of course not. The matters are discussed in a sort of code using insider terms.
No comments:
Post a Comment