Pages

Friday, January 4, 2019

January 4, 2019 -- A Quick Run Around the Web (Update)

"Earth Catastrophe Cycle | SOLAR MICRONOVA II"--Suspicious Observers (16 min.)
Also read my post, "Inconstant Moon," where I discuss descriptions from the Bible describing something similar during the last days.

  • This week's Weekend Knowledge Dump at Active Response Training. Lots of links to good resources, but I'll mention a couple: a link to an article discussing how to make sure your handgun fits you; and a video that explains some points about drawing a handgun while in a crowd. Also, Ellifritz points out the downside to most tactical pens: "Too many people know what they are and what they can be used for.  If you rely on a tactical pen as a defensive weapon, it should be very low profile." In other words, it should look like a normal pen.
  • This time of year, we start seeing the announcement of new firearms to generate buzz prior to Shot Show:
  • "Bill Drill | A Simple Drill"--The Firearms Rack. This drill is shot with the pistol holstered and hands in the air (like a surrender position); 6 shots at 7 yards into the "A" zone of an IPSC target or similar size target. The author notes that this drill tests both speed and accuracy, and while there is a not par time, 3 seconds or less is very good.
  • "How Much Is Your Life Worth? SafeGuard Armor Ghost Bullet Proof Vest Review"--More Than Just Surviving. This is a Level IIIA vest that can be worn fairly discretely. The author notes that "Yes, it’s still going to slightly print, but unless you know what you are looking for, the vest is basically undetectable with the right clothing." But he also found it comfortable to wear all day. He recommends it for people that work in high crime areas or jobs that attract criminal attacks such as convenience store work, delivery jobs, etc.
  • Update: Greg Ellifritz notes that vests can last a considerable time and still be effective. See his comments in the comment section below.
        The Kevlar® interior needs to stay out of direct content with liquids and sunlight. The vest needs to be stored properly as well. You need to store your vest in a place that will allow it to rest in a flat position. Many people choose to hang their vests, or store them in a drawer.

       How often you wear your bullet proof vest will also affect how often it will need to be replaced. A vest that is worn on a daily basis will need to be replaced sooner than a vest that is only worn on rare occasions.

       The carrier may become damaged over time. All carriers need to be inspected on a regular basis to ensure that they fit well; if straps begin to stretch, or the Velcro is not working properly, you may want to purchase a replacement carrier. It is critical that the carrier remains undamaged, or the vest's protection level may be lowered as a result.

        The last thing that greatly affects the length of time that body armor can be used is the way it is worn. Vests are made to be worn a certain way. When the wearer gains or loses weight, it can decrease the lifespan of the body armor. Someone who loses a large amount of weight will put excess stress on the ballistic panels because they will be able to move around inside of the carrier rather than press snuggly against the body. If someone gains weight, it could cause their vest to crease and damage the ballistic panels. It is important for you to wear a vest that fits you well and make adjustments when needed to ensure that the body armor works as well as it possibly can. Taking the time to be sure that your vest is well maintained, stored properly, and the carrier is replaced when needed, will allow the body armor to last for a very long time.
Vest manufacturers generally recommend that the vest be replaced every 5 years. While vests can be effective after this is properly cared for, in looking at different articles on this topic, I saw references to police departments replacing vests in as little as 2 or 3 years where the vest saw heavy use or was often exposed to heat or moisture.


Tucker Carlson explains that the biggest threat to our nation right now is declining marriage rates and the disintegration of the family. 
        The goal for America is both simpler and more elusive than mere prosperity. It’s happiness. There are a lot of ingredients in being happy: Dignity. Purpose. Self-control. Independence. Above all, deep relationships with other people. Those are the things that you want for your children. They’re what our leaders should want for us, and would want if they cared. 
        But our leaders don’t care. We are ruled by mercenaries who feel no long-term obligation to the people they rule. They’re day traders. Substitute teachers. They’re just passing through. They have no skin in this game, and it shows. They can’t solve our problems. They don’t even bother to understand our problems.
  • The Washington Post op-ed by Mitt Romney referenced by Carlson is entitled, "Mitt Romney: The president shapes the public character of the nation. Trump’s character falls short." That fact that Romney, ostensibly a Republican, would have this published in the leftist Washington Post instead of a centrist paper like the Wall Street Journal should pretty much tell you all you need to know about this. I will let you read the piece if you want. I thought it to be poorly written--a stream of consciousness or list of talking points instead of something thoughtful. And very globalist in its outlook and conciliatory toward China: "America is strongest when our arms are linked with other nations. We want a unified and strong Europe, not a disintegrating union. We want stable relationships with the nations of Asia that strengthen our mutual security and prosperity."
  • As you probably know, the value of Apple's stock shares fell sharply after Apple announced forecasts of declining sales. Apple has primarily blamed declining demand in China, and that set off some alarms about the strength of China's economy. Drudge had a link to an article today that discusses that aspect in more detail: "Apple's stark warning may be ominous news for China"--Stuff.co. From that article:
        Car sales have been shrinking for the first time since 1990, when most of the country was peddling bicycles. A key manufacturing survey at the end of the year showed Chinese factory activity actually contracting. And revenue from consumption tax was down 72 per cent in November from a year ago, Balding said.

       Chinese investors have been among the most pessimistic about their economy's prospects: China's stock market lost US$2.3 trillion, or about a quarter of its value, in 2018 - its worst performance in a decade.
Remember, as George Friedman has written, countries with close economic ties are more likely to go to war with each other than countries with little or no ties.
          Spark Networks Inc., owner of ChristianMingle.com, LDSSingles.com and other faith-based dating websites, will make its services more LGBT-friendly after settling a discrimination lawsuit filed by two gay men.
            The dating sites previously “required new users to specify whether they’re a man seeking a woman or a woman seeking a man,” The Wall Street Journal reported. Now, people will simply sign-up as a male or female.
             Additionally, “Spark Networks agreed that within two years, it would adjust other searching and profile features to give gay and lesbian singles a more tailored experience,” the article noted.
          The lawsuit was pursued under a California anti-discrimination law. 

          5 comments:

          1. Spark Networks Inc., isn't in the clear yet. A binary gender choice is not sufficiently inclusive, especially since Facebook recognizes something like 71 genders. Next, transgenders will be upset that normal people don't want to date transgenders, so they will sue to force normal people to date transgenders.

            ReplyDelete
            Replies
            1. Undoubtedly. This is why I dislike anti-discrimination laws and believe that they are immoral: they don't protect the rights of the individuals or the minority, unless they are a privileged minority.

              Delete
          2. With regard to the body armor article, when I was the training officer for the police department, I was responsible for ordering new vests for the officers and testing the old vests to verify that they continued to be effective. I've probably shot 50 different vests over the years. All of those vests had been worn daily for five years before I got them.

            As long as the panels hadn't been soaked in water or left out in the sunlight, the vest worked regardless of age. I never had a vest that didn't stop a round that it was rated to stop. I shot some vests that were almost 30 years old. They still stopped bullets.

            The vest I am wearing on duty now is 8 years old. I have a new one, but I've lost weight and the old one fits me better. I have no worries about the out of date vest failing.

            Thanks again for sharing my Knowledge Dump.

            ReplyDelete
            Replies
            1. Thanks for chiming in with the additional information. It's good to have this information from a dependable source. And thank you for all the information that you provide to the shooting/self-defense community. I really appreciate it.

              Delete
          3. Nice Niven reference, and nice post (2017 one).

            ReplyDelete