One of the basic tools for wilderness survival is a good chopping tool. I received a
Gerber Bear Grylls Parang for Christmas. According to Gerber, the Parang boasts a 13 inch long blade, with an overall length of 19.5 inches. Its weight is 19.4 ounces; 25.4 ounces with the sheath.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgCT79OtzovNNqMZKpagmmE-mENAOgmlAAUvZpYxz7K47pkzE5RlP7DGDcmFO-V91vh8fHaooSEguU8O1zuYe2EAapd3JG72izObdJuHC6K00yeLDmGw1J6jNqQOKijcq6VU0XG0bLXu2E/s280/Parang+Front.jpg) |
Parang - front side |
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjKX2ijg3KDEs2WevIJAF5ajqejN-Uu_Qm_SGeEuPjVrFErOK07Ghe4cepRvBSIE4u4lZj3siajByDMXVM65_yTDZUk0aC7pNdhfFCEpwKTLSW2LlTJdQpvG0urTHWIgqLGqj0pPWOAI9k/s280/Parang+Back.jpg) |
Parang - back side |
As you can see from the photographs above, the Parang comes with a padded nylon sheath. The Parang is secured with a nylon strap that fastens closed with velcro. The belt loop is right at the width of a typical belt. Like many other of the Gerber Bear Grylls products, it comes with a water resistant sheet of instructions on certain basic survival skills. On the back of the sheath (see second photograph above) there is a small label with emergency signaling instructions printed on it. I appreciated that it was only stitched on three sides, making a small pocket for the survival instructions to fit into it when folded. Finally, there is a lanyard that is intended to fit around the handle (see above)--you slide your fingers underneath the lanyard when gripping the handle.
I'm not someone in the financial position to torture test a tool to failure. Besides, it is not in my nature to abuse my tools. I thought, however, that a performance test was in order. I decided to compare the Parang to other chopping tools: a Gerber camp axe (essentially a hatchet), a Kukri, and Cold Steel's Kukri machete. (See below).
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjuI4vjRzqiUGqwI2j3j8Gp2iN0auBDCfMkfK1DEwTX461-yc3fyoaGhQldBnlesDxOJUBH7tUNhaeQ6A8VBCZQmGhWVkUFNXF35mC5JWMNvh01iyjITXAjdCzvzPHz23n6IB5YUsBFkCo/s280/Gerber+Kukri+machete.jpg) |
Cold Steel's Kukri Machete |
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhn1izZpaS0halOh4BBAbjedAmGhu52Q7j0Yyw_pXEnk5c0z3nyBe4hDIie4DllyFbdkceSdWP6FoUcN7qeiPQwwUOupTt80Hg8i3wxpRVcexhdh0SOtn_Gkuh3v9QwbSgmwHx5i9nKnOM/s280/Axe+and+Kukri.jpg) |
Kukri and Gerber camp axe |
The Kukri features a 12 inch blade, with a 1/4 inch thick spine. The
Cold Steel Kukri machete has a 13 inch blade that is 2 mm thick.
The Gerber camp axe is the original model, which has been discontinued. However, other than a slightly thicker head and polymer/fiberglass handle, I thought it would be representative of a traditional hatchet.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEii5k2EcdE2R-IpHlAqpOTz_DKfkE905FlFN0Hras0Jnr4gGeuoieKFoJhU75Hm7IQOIFdYlYq173CefVpawxMzF7ZTGNtq9FYoUh-_BESdYzPaf_kwKTykR530MYUL8JOlfmFOZJ3Sg_k/s280/Test+subject.jpg) |
My test subject - a stand of poplar |
I decided to test the various tools against a stand of poplar, featuring shoots/branches of between 1 and 2 inches in diameter. The first test would be to chop a free standing shoot down. The second test would be to chop through the shoot while resting on a stump. Obviously, such a test is inherently subjective since it depends on my ability with using the tool, and the fact that there will be some variance between the thickness of the poplar shoots. I decided on this test because this size of wood was a size that might be used as poles for building a shelter or spear, or for wood for a fire (keeping in mind that wood used for fueling a small fire should generally be no thicker than a man's wrist).
The Camp Axe/Hatchet
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgG4ASe2aBi_9NsoHI64YUkBTbRVFyMC0ucFWWtmWSWaI7i4vsSDq7kUQvJFi9PwWWhP21q_uQvukfIJJyxieFX7SlOgdlcXMxYukRgMRSOxH3a9jJ5CEmsOspRLzfyJhu76v5ReQ_fFuw/s280/Axe-1.jpg) |
Axe - the wood after being chopped down |
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEizAhp8HnJqf1nEtJjIxEpMVmIVECexsor1wmwplSZ856KQDINQX_sA3ErFxKbLeG_SjSuMAe1xWIcFnbdxfmqnGU-SujVDpCwrHsJA4ftB7B3t4_RzW748PQlXH3-VVQTazJ7WgBFbaug/s280/Axe-2.jpg) |
Cutting the wood on a stump |
The poplar shoot I cut down with the axe ended up being two inches in diameter at the point it was cut down. It took 40 chops to cut through it, although I believe that part of this was because the wood split about half-way through the process, allowing it to flex more readily, absorbing the energy. Also, I didn't alternate directions like I should have, which probably slowed the process.
On the stump, it took 4 chops to cut through the wood. However, it measured as 1 inch in diameter at that point. I subsequently tried a different piece, which was about 1.5 inches in diameter, and it took 5 whacks to chop through it.
Traditional Kukri
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjqwcKn5_Q-WOb4ie5IRZMT7zIlJLh6Qr_s-oEZzNNsephROcAVv0dCghHeDdQB4c0kKQrGMOQfQ9fArbv8JohJedrzWBY8Nu9fKFW0dc1SRqpxogOKCJ802VSkFR-qxt3qyM_C5H_tBHY/s280/Kukri-1.jpg) |
Kukri -- after chopped down |
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhwsURhce4vZg8vkfjmGi9mp56w-QsadW-CSY_WnPRmAmK_DvMSdzZ35Ne_VbwCO8HPy-kBC5ACCQyRD95HXEGsYddYJcjGFDAcgHCQiqKes1unRVRRXNOgHd4BPBRzpKBBKwcMxgTUBxM/s280/Kukri-2.jpg) |
Kukri--chopping through the wood on a stump |
The shoot I used for the traditional Kukri was approximately 1.5 inches in diameter. Cutting it down took 42 chops. Cutting it on the stump into a shorter piece took 10 chops.
Cold Steel Kukri Machete
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhasIO0XtOfkFNDCmQQ10Z9Y79MEAcOdiHLFRdehLZcCEQbv2eLZuIwicqB53-OpgaZLhajaAYxf7WC1oW9VRp0Am8qDDFcb1MNdP5A_Da33f4q8ajBkhDLodNViESjVtJcgjeFqqXlS50/s280/CS+Kukri-1.jpg) |
Cold Steel Kukri machete -- after chopping down the shoot |
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgGCXa9eXVxewPaX3uNjxLnAxn1IrsdVFhIkuRtixAEbPAXBfznQq-QZ7T4AeJyA9OA0M-x4ZIPHTonHP6RtNpK5P_TjKvcAw-NXtVqai6viD3JZVAkLfoQ3325Y88dFlg3KxeX3mWHGm8/s280/CS+Kukri-2.jpg) |
Cold Steel Kukri machete -- chopping on the block |
The Cold Steel Kukre machete has a much thinner blade than the traditional Kukri. It took 25 chops to cut down a shoot that measured 1.75 inches thick. When cutting it to a shorter length on the stump, it took 12 chops, and the wood measured about 1.5 inches thick at that point.
The Gerber Bear Grylls Parang
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEivNE7ncJzy335Z6zrC3HbJCazsX3sRGuUizmqlXJGHaelxbL92fRG3_-IrQHX8GKCLjOzckgpIkTavdWxqnohtBc8LZzRTRKvyFllCjLapjddD3fdTtX6otM3HG_yBhnvPug3ICyD3I58/s280/Parang+1.jpg) |
Parang -- after chopping down shoot |
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgLiVc7wySLFda9JxaHv443sgRvQgYBozr4FtqjDDRY-8hF7vjWJ9Sisu2Csj4xKpfr1GE0hESCt37yzpdwwU4rqIa9mDiq243io12Psw2iYGij7cSVO8t4ckNcJx5DlNwS-2HSVzpCt2g/s280/Parang+2.jpg) |
Parang -- after cutting the wood to a shorter length |
The Parang performed much better than the other tools. It only took 8 chops to cut down a shoot that measured 1.5 inches in diameter. It took 5 chops to cut through the poplar shoot when placed on the stump. Obviously this was excellent performance. I would also note that I was very impressed with the handle on the Parang that allowed a good grip while wearing light-weight gloves, and seemed to absorb the shock of each blow better than the materials used on the other tools.
I must confess that I was surprised by the results. I already knew from prior use that the traditional Kukri was not as good of a chopper as other tools. I thought that the machete would be less effective than the axe, but seemed to work better for chopping down the free-standing shoots. I expected that the axe would have difficulty with chopping down the flexible shoots, but thought it would perform better than it did. I expected the Parang to perform about the same as the machete, but it actually worked much better and, overall, was the best of the tools on this particular test.
Update:
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjeZuUjxY9DxaAGaq1_3h1V0J_y8LjibtGuCkd5Ctx0O083vtQN3nUfhhWqVy1fRoXbXizEMhtuyeI0PFnzQ0mk4X_unTweM24k8rgEFHrBKW4pJN5qbCCJPv_aXBAozlfCjbLCgBJcxH8/s280/Hatchet+and+Tomahawk.jpg) |
Traditional Hatchet and SOG Tomahawk |
I decided to add a couple other tools to the mix: a standard, traditional hatchet; and SOG's tactical Tomahawk (see photo above).
In my initial test, I was actually surprised and disappointed with the performance of my Gerber camp ax--essentially a lightweight hatchet. One of the distinctive characteristics of the Gerber axe is that the cutting edge is straight. I wondered if a typical hatchet, with a slight curvature to the blade, would work any better. Putting it to the test, it did indeed work better. Cutting a branch, this time, it took some 11 strikes to chop through an approximately 2-inch thick branch. For the test of chopping wood on the block, I used a segment from my earlier tests that was about 1.5 inches in diameter. It took 3 chops to cut through.
I borrowed the Tomahawk, just to see how it might compare since it has a shorter blade than the Gerber ax, but a longer handle. It made short work of taking a 1.5 inch diameter branch off of a poplar stand: 8 whacks. However, it took 15 chops to cut through the wood segment (again using one from my earlier tests) when placed on the block. Thinking that there was something wrong, I tried another section of the wood, which this time took 11 chops to get through. So, still somewhat surprising of a result since none of the other tools took more chops to get through the wood on a block than when chopping it down in the first instance. I can only surmise that the branch cut off the stand of poplar was softer than the wood used in the block test.
No comments:
Post a Comment