tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2195077991229481958.post3732363007872263955..comments2024-03-27T09:54:14.832-06:00Comments on Practical Eschatology: The Glock 42 and Building an ARUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2195077991229481958.post-45257106093272224392014-01-01T10:59:05.977-07:002014-01-01T10:59:05.977-07:00You are correct--there are now plenty of other sma...You are correct--there are now plenty of other small, lightweight carry guns out on the market. That was part of the point I was trying to make in saying that this is a pistol that Glock should have developed a long time ago. Glock is late to the market, and behind the curve. But this may also indicate that Glock will take a more serious look at the civilian concealed carry market.Docenthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13573255956484552163noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2195077991229481958.post-51116616837595678402013-12-31T18:35:00.007-07:002013-12-31T18:35:00.007-07:00IMHO, the specifications for that Glock 42 are uni...IMHO, the specifications for that Glock 42 are unimpressive. It is big for a modern .380 pistol, especially in comparison to the Kel Tec P3AT or Ruger LCP. The Kel Tek PF-9 compares very favorably in size and weight to the Glock, and it shoots 9mm.<br /><br />Sure, Glock will sell lots of them simply because it is a Glock.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com